General Committee Meeting - 9 June 2026
Date: Tuesday, 9 June 2026 at 10:00AM
Location: Noosa Shire Council Chambers , 9 Pelican Street , Tewantin , QLD 4565 , Australia
Organiser: Noosa Shire Council
Duration: 06:36:07
Synopsis: Active Street halted with grants reallocated, Tourism Noosa deed approved on casting vote, Botanic Gardens masterplan adopted, Noosa Junction land exchange endorsed, Biosecurity plan to consultation.
Meeting Attendees
Committee Members
Brian Stockwell Karen Finzel Amelia Lorentson Jessica Phillips Tom Wegener Nicola Wilson Executive Officers
Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock Director Community Services Kerri Contini Acting Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh Apologies (Did Not Attend)
AI-Generated Meeting Insight
Key Decisions & Discussions Peregian Beach Active Street Stage 1 will not proceed in current form; CEO to seek reallocation of SEQ Liveability/Active Transport grants to practical works (paths, stormwater, parking, street trees) and report ASAP (Item 7.1; 01:59:52–02:12:18). Tourism Noosa Funding & Performance Deed 2026–2029 approved for $2M p.a. (CPI capped 3.5%), with a balanced scorecard KPI framework and up to $350k performance adjustment on the second instalment; carried on Chair’s casting vote (Item 7.12; 05:43:59–05:44:20). Noosa Botanic Gardens Masterplan adopted to guide 25-year upgrades (pathways, entry, living collection, accessibility, Friends facilities), informed by Phase 2 engagement (Item 7.11; 03:42:27–03:55:10). Legacy Plot Reservation Management Policy adopted to reclaim unused cemetery reservations older than 25 years via a transparent, legally-vetted process with a “safety net” reserved plot (Item 7.8; 03:16:18–03:26:09). Sport4All report noted; Council to consider future funding for an organisation‑wide Access & Inclusion function and framework when budgets permit; proposal to immediately fund a permanent Inclusion Officer did not secure a seconder (Item 7.9; 03:27:22–03:35:05). 2026–27 Community Grants endorsed across multiple streams (Projects, Facilities, Equipment, Events; Signature Events), leveraging high community ROI (Items 7.2–7.7; 02:42:35–03:15:05). 2026–27 Fees & Charges referred for a further report due to State RTI fee updates and admin corrections (Item 7.10; 03:40:44–03:41:34). Noosa Biosecurity Plan 2026–2031 approved for public consultation; risk‑based management of invasive plants/animals across tenures (Item 7.13; 05:45:02–06:01:46). Env & Climate Change Grants split into two reports for Ordinary Meeting to manage conflicts (Item 7.14; 06:10:32–06:15:57). Planning applications decided under delegation for April 2026 noted (Item 7.15; 06:16:41–06:18:01). Confidential land rationalisation at Noosa Junction: Council endorsed a market‑value land exchange framework and authorised CEO actions; exception to tender relied on s236(1)(c)(v) LGR 2012 (Item 8.1; 06:31:58–06:36:40). Contentious / Transparency Matters Peregian Active Street debate revealed strong local opposition vs. regional safety/transport benefits; community trust, survey access, and “opportunistic funding” were flashpoints (Item 7.1; 01:31:02–01:40:12). Meeting closed to discuss legal advice on Active Street under s254J(3)(e) LGR 2012; later reopened (Item 7.1; 34:05–34:21). Chair disallowed a question during cemetery policy; dissent motion lost 4–2, raising process sensitivity (Item 7.8; 03:23:03–03:25:09). Tourism Noosa deed passed on Chair’s casting vote after multiple accountability amendments failed (Item 7.12; 04:27:49–05:19:03, 05:43:59–05:44:20). Confidential land deal closed under s254J(3)(g) LGR 2012; public resolution emphasised no fettering of future DA assessment and no net loss of public parking (Item 8.1; 05:59:25–06:36:40). Legal / Risk Grant risk: staff confirmed potential need to repay or seek scope change if Active Street is cancelled; CEO tasked to pursue reallocation with SEQ funds bodies (Item 7.1; 06:38–07:47, 01:47:09–01:48:10). Governance: Capital Works Executive process cited as oversight for contract scope/costs; regular updates to all Councillors added by amendment (Item 7.1; 09:11–10:22, 01:22:49–01:25:35). OIA/Conduct: Query raised about potential mayoral influence and OIA process; CEO noted determination pending and separate from Council procedures (Item 7.1; 01:28:41–01:30:57). Cemetery policy rests on legal advice; Queensland lacks a clear statute, so a defensible local policy with notice/claims pathway adopted (Item 7.8; 03:16:18–03:21:36). Tourism Deed: clear separation of deliverables (Schedule 1) vs. KPIs (Schedule 2) and simplified funding adjustment model (Schedule 3); CPI cap 3.5% (Item 7.12; minutes pp.12–13). Land exchange relied on LGR s236(1)(c)(v) exception (land-for-land, public interest, sound contracting); express non‑fetters of planning function recorded (Item 8.1; 06:31:58–06:36:40). Conflicts of Interest Nicola Wilson (Vice President, Noosa Arts Theatre) and Brian Stockwell (President, Noosa Lions FC) declared prescribed COIs on Facility Development grants; left; Acting Chair appointed; neither voted (Item 7.4; 02:59:57–03:03:50). Brian Stockwell declared a declarable COI on Env/Climate Grants (unsuccessful applicant); left on CEO advice; item split to two future reports (Item 7.14; 06:02:06–06:15:57). Active Transport & Community Infrastructure Peregian Active Street’s governance tightened (CWE updates) but ultimately overturned in favour of reallocating grants to practical local works aligned with community feedback (Item 7.1; 01:22:49–01:25:35; 01:59:52–02:12:18). Awareness campaign for “Active Street/Coastal Pathway” must secure TMR/QPS endorsement to align messaging/signage/enforcement with road law (amended and carried) (Item 7.1; 01:28:17–01:30:30). Botanic Gardens plan emphasises accessible promenade path and living collection stewardship; CPTED and water-quality sensitivities near Lake Macdonald noted (Item 7.11; 03:42:27–03:55:10). Tourism Governance & Community Impacts Deed reframed to align with DMP and Roadmap; quarterly reviews and annual plan/KPIs enable adjustments without “set-and-forget” rigidity (Item 7.12; 04:12:12–04:13:25). Amendments seeking a roles & responsibilities framework, a Peak Demand Management Plan, and auditable “no day‑tripper targeting” marketing KPIs were debated and lost (Item 7.12; 04:27:49–05:19:03). Members emphasised lack of empirical congestion data to apportion impacts; call for clearer Council/TN accountability and datasets (Item 7.12; 04:55:26–04:58:24). Environmental Concerns & Biosecurity Biosecurity Plan advances risk‑based control across tenures; fire ants not detected in Noosa but nearby; landfill and rapid‑response protocols active (Item 7.13; 05:50:56–05:52:53). Discussion acknowledged herbicide controversy vs. weed pressure and long‑term ecosystem protection; plan proceeds to GoVocal consultation (Item 7.13; 05:56:44–06:01:46).
Official Meeting Minutes
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 General Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, 9 June 2026 10:00am Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin Committee: Crs Brian Stockwell (Chair), Karen Finzel, Amelia Lorentson, Jessica Phillips, Tom Wegener, Frank Wilkie, Nicola Wilson “Noosa Shire – different by nature” Page 1 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 MINUTES ORDER OF BUSINESS 1 DECLARATION OF OPENING The meeting was declared open at 10.03am. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY Noosa Council respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waters of the Noosa area, the Kabi Kabi people, and pays respect to their Elders, past, present and emerging. 3 ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES COMMITTEE MEMBERS Cr Brian Stockwell (Chair) Cr Karen Finzel Cr Amelia Lorentson Cr Jessica Phillips Cr Tom Wegener Cr Nicola Wilson EXECUTIVE Chief Executive Officer Larry Sengstock Director Community Services Kerri Contini Acting Director Corporate Services Margaret Gatt Director Development & Regulation Richard MacGillivray Director Infrastructure Services Shaun Walsh APOLOGIES Cr Frank Wilkie 4 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 4.1 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES DATED 12 MAY 2026 Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That the Minutes of the General Committee Meeting held on 12 May 2026 be received and confirmed. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Page 2 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 5. PRESENTATIONS Nil. 6. DEPUTATIONS Nil. 7 REPORTS DIRECT TO GENERAL COMMITTEE 7.1 PEREGIAN BEACH ACTIVE STREET - STAGE 1 PROGRESS UPDATE AND NEXT STEPS (Deferred from the Ordinary Meeting dated 19 March 2026 - Item 12.2) The following material was presented to the meeting in relation to this item 2026-06-09 ATTACHMENT 1 to Minutes of General Committee 9.06.2026 Peregian Beach Active Street - Further Information 2026-06-09 ATTACHMENT 2 to Minutes of General Committee 9.06.2026 Peregian Beach Active Street - Outline of Councillor Involvement 2026-06-09 CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE - ATTACHMENT 3 to Minutes of General Committee 9.06.2026 - Peregian Beach Active St - Further Community Feedback - Confidential in accordance with Section 254D (3) of the LG Regulation 2012 - this is not publicly available as it contains information that is confidential to the local government. Motion Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That Council: A. Note the report by the Project Officer to the General Committee meeting dated 16 March 2026 regarding the Peregian Beach Active St - Stage 1 project status including key findings from the community consultation activities and proposed design amendments; B. Delegate authority to the CEO to finalise, negotiate and award the construction contract for the Peregian Beach Active Street – Stage 1 Project, including approval of all contract variations within the approved project budget, for the purpose of expediting delivery enabling project completion by the required State and Federal grant funding timeframes C. Note that whilst the project is grant funded, financial reconciliation is not finalised, with additional costs arising from additional community engagement and project scope changes; D. Support the development of an “Active Street” and “Coastal Pathway” awareness and education campaign across the shire to raise awareness of the safety and active transport benefits associated with Active Streets and the ultimate delivery of the Noosa Cycling and Walking Strategy and Noosa Transport Strategy; E. Support the CEO to submit available grant funding applications for Stage 2 of the Active Street/Coastal Pathway extension to commence design and construction as soon as practicably possible. Page 3 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 Procedural Motion Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J(3)(e) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing legal advice obtained by the local government for Item 7.1 Peregian Beach Active Street. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Procedural Motion Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That the meeting be re-opened to the public. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Amendment No. 1 Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Item B be amended to read: That any Delegate authority to the CEO to finalise, negotiate and award the construction contract for the Peregian Beach Active Street – Stage 1 Project, be brought back to Council for approval and that no contract be awarded until all outstanding design matters identified in this report have been resolved and brought back to Council. including approval of all contract variations within the approved project budget, for the purpose of expediting delivery enabling project completion by the required State and Federal grant funding timeframes; Lost. For: Cr Amelia Lorentson Against: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Amendment No. 2 Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That B be amended to read: B. Delegate authority to the CEO to finalise, negotiate and award the construction contract for the Peregian Beach Active Street – Stage 1 Project, including approval of all contract variations within the approved project budget, for the purpose of expediting delivery enabling project completion by the required State and Federal grant funding timeframes noting that regular updates through the Capital Works Executive process will be distributed to all Councillors. Carried. Page 4 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Amendment No. 3 Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That Item D be amended to read: D. Support the development of an “Active Street” and “Coastal Pathway” awareness and education campaign across the shire. to raise awareness of the safety and active transport benefits associated with Active Streets and the ultimate delivery of the Noosa Cycling and Walking Strategy and Noosa Transport Strategy. Any implementation of the campaign must be subject to formal endorsement by the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) and the Queensland Police Service (QPS), including confirmation that the proposed messaging, signage, and enforcement approach align with relevant legislation and road safety requirements. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Motion Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That Council: A. Note the report by the Project Officer to the General Committee meeting dated 16 March 2026 regarding the Peregian Beach Active St - Stage 1 project status including key findings from the community consultation activities and proposed design amendments; B. Delegate authority to the CEO to finalise, negotiate and award the construction contract for the Peregian Beach Active Street – Stage 1 Project, including approval of all contract variations within the approved project budget, for the purpose of expediting delivery enabling project completion by the required State and Federal grant funding timeframes noting that regular updates through the Capital Works Executive process will be distributed to all Councillors. C. Note that whilst the project is grant funded, financial reconciliation is not finalised, with additional costs arising from additional community engagement and project scope changes; D. Support the development of an “Active Street” and “Coastal Pathway” awareness and education campaign across the shire. Any implementation of the campaign must be subject to formal endorsement by the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) and the Queensland Police Service (QPS), including confirmation that the proposed messaging, signage, and enforcement approach align with relevant legislation and road safety requirements. E. Support the CEO to submit available grant funding applications for Stage 2 of the Active Street/Coastal Pathway extension to commence design and construction as soon as practicably possible. Lost. Page 5 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener Against: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Wilson Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council: A. Note the report by the Project Officer to the General Committee meeting dated 16 March 2026 regarding the Peregian Beach Active St - Stage 1 project status and determine that the project not proceed in the current form; B. Direct the CEO to engage with the Southeast Qld Liveability Fund and Active Transport Fund to determine whether available grant funding can be reallocated to deliver practical infrastructure improvements in Peregian Beach South or alternatives, including but not limited to pedestrian footpath connections, stormwater infrastructures, formalised parking and street planting, consistent with the priorities expressed by the community throughout the engagement process; C. Direct the CEO to report back to Council as soon as possible. Carried. For: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener The meeting adjourned at 12.15pm The meeting resumed at 12.45pm. 7.2 2026-2027 COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAM - COMMUNITY PROJECT AND SIGNATURE COMMUNITY EVENT GRANTS - SUMMARY Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Tom Wegener Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That Council: A. Note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2026 outlining the summary of the 2026-27 Community Project Grants, out-of-round Three Year Signature Community Event Grants; and B. Approve the allocation of the remaining 2026/27 Community Project Grants budget to Quick Response grants and emergent grant requirements that may arise throughout the year, subject to sufficient funds being allocated in Council’s adopted 2026/27 Community Grants Program budget. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Page 6 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 7.3 2026-2027 COMMUNITY PROJECT GRANTS PROGRAM – PROJECTS Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Karen Finzel Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council A. Note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2026; and B. Approve the 2026-27 Community Project Grants Program - Projects as outlined in Attachment 1, subject to sufficient funds totalling $61,916.10 being allocated in Council's adopted 2026-27 Community Grants Program budget. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 7.4 2026-2027 COMMUNITY PROJECT GRANTS PROGRAM - FACILITY DEVELOPMENT Cr Nicola Wilson "In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009 - I inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in relation to Item 7.4 - 2026-2027 COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAM - COMMUNITY PROJECT GRANTS (FACILITY DEVELOPMENT) as Noosa Arts Theatre have been recommended as a recipient of a facility development grant. I am the senior Vice President of Noosa Arts Theatre. As a result of my conflict of interest, I will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on." Cr Nicola Wilson left the meeting. Cr Brian Stockwell "In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009 - I inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in relation to Item 7.4 - 2026-2027 COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAM - COMMUNITY PROJECT GRANTS (FACILITY DEVELOPMENT) on this agenda, as I am the current President of the Noosa Lions Football Club who are recommended for funding. As a result of my conflict of interest, I will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on." Cr Brian Stockwell left the meeting. Committee Resolution Moved: Cr Tom Wegener Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That Cr Phillips appointed as Acting Chairperson of the meeting due to the conflict of interest declaration by Cr Stockwell. Carried. For: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener Against: None Cr Brian Stockwell and Cr Nicola Wilson having declared conflicts of interest were ineligible to vote. Page 7 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council A. Note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2026; and B. Approve the 2026-27 Community Project Grants Program - Facility Development as outlined in Attachment 1, subject to sufficient funds totalling $147,296.32 being allocated in Council's adopted 2026-27 Community Grants Program budget. Carried. For: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener Against: None Cr Brian Stockwell and Cr Nicola Wilson having declared conflicts of interest were ineligible to vote. Cr Brian Stockwell and Cr Nicola Wilson returned to the meeting. Cr Brian Stockwell resumed the Chair. 7.5 2026-2027 COMMUNITY PROJECT GRANTS PROGRAM - EQUIPMENT Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Karen Finzel Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That Council A. Note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2026; and B. Approve the 2026-2027 Community Project Grants Program - Equipment as outlined in Attachment 1, subject to sufficient funds totalling $16,754.40 being allocated in Council’s adopted 2026/27 Community Grants Program budget. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 7.6 2026-2027 COMMUNITY PROJECT GRANTS PROGRAM - EVENTS Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That Council A. Note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2026; and Page 8 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 B. Approve the 2026-27 Community Project Grants Program - Events as outlined in Attachment 1, subject to sufficient funds totalling $32,500 being allocated in Council's adopted 2026-27 Community Grants Program budget. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 7.7 2026-2027 COMMUNITY GRANTS PROGRAM - THREE-YEAR SIGNATURE COMMUNITY EVENT GRANTS Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Karen Finzel Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council A. Note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2026; and B. Approve the out-of-round 2026-27 Three-Year Signature Community Event Grants as outlined in Attachment 1, subject to sufficient funds totalling $27,000 being allocated in the adopted 2026-27 Council budget. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 7.8 LEGACY PLOT RESERVATION MANAGEMENT POLICY The Chair disallowed a question from Cr Lorentson. Procedural Motion Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That the Chairperson's ruling be dissented from. Lost. For: Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Against: Nicola Wilson Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Karen Finzel Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That Council Page 9 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 A. Note the report by the Community Connection Manager to the General Committee dated 9 June 2026 regarding unused cemetery plots (burial and ash interment sites) reserved 25 years or more ago at the Tewantin, Cooroy and Pomona cemeteries; B. Adopt the Legacy Plot Reservation Management Policy, as provided in Attachment 1 to the report; and C. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to implement the Policy, including the development of supporting procedures, notification processes and record keeping requirements. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 7.9 "SPORT4ALL" ACCESS AND INCLUSION PROGRAM - OUTCOMES AND LEARNINGS Motion Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That Council A. Note the report by the Inclusion Coach to the General Committee dated 9 June 2026 regarding the outcomes of Noosa Council’s Sport4All Access and Inclusion Program; B. Subject to future funding availability, consider establishing an ongoing, organisation-wide Access and Inclusion function to strengthen inclusive practices across planning, infrastructure, services and programs, and support community organisations to sustain and expand participation pathways; and C. Subject to future funding availability, develop a whole-of-Council Access and Inclusion Framework to embed inclusive principles and guide priorities. Amendment Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Nil That D be added to read D. Request the inclusion of funding for a permanent Inclusion Officer role in the future 2026/2027 budget having regard to the demonstrated return on investment delivered through the Sports for All program and the ongoing and growing access and inclusion needs of the Noosa community. The amendment lapsed for want of a seconder. Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That Council A. Note the report by the Inclusion Coach to the General Committee dated 9 June 2026 regarding the outcomes of Noosa Council’s Sport4All Access and Inclusion Program; Page 10 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 B. Subject to future funding availability, consider establishing an ongoing, organisation-wide Access and Inclusion function to strengthen inclusive practices across planning, infrastructure, services and programs, and support community organisations to sustain and expand participation pathways; and C. Subject to future funding availability, develop a whole-of-Council Access and Inclusion Framework to embed inclusive principles and guide priorities. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: Cr Amelia Lorentson 7.10 2026-2027 FEES AND CHARGES Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That General Committee Agenda Item 7.10 2026-2027 Fees and Charges be referred to the Ordinary Meeting for a further report. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 7.11 NOOSA BOTANIC GARDENS MASTERPLAN Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Karen Finzel Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That Council A. Note the report by the Parks and Streetscapes Coordinator to the General Committee dated 9 June 2026 outlining the Phase 2 Engagement summary and the finalised draft Masterplan for the Noosa Botanic Gardens; B. Note the Masterplan's proposed use to inform ongoing future operational and capital works program budgets including sourcing funding from external grants; and C. Approve the finalised Masterplan for the Noosa Botanic Gardens provided at Attachment 1. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None The meeting adjourned at 1.58pm. The meeting resumed at 2.06pm. Page 11 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 7.12 FURTHER REPORT - TOURISM NOOSA FUNDING AND PERFORMANCE DEED 2026–2029 Motion Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That Council A. Note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the General Committee dated 13 April 2026 and this Further Report to the General Committee dated 9 June 2026 regarding the Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029; B. Note that, in response to Council’s resolution of 16 April 2026, the Deed Schedules have been revised to: i. Separate Agreed Obligations and Deliverables (Schedule 1) from performance measures; ii. Introduce a Balanced Scorecard framework of KPIs in Schedule 2; and iii. Simplify the performance-based funding adjustment model in Schedule 3; C. Approve the revised Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029 with Tourism Noosa Ltd for a term of three (3) years, commencing 1 July 2026 and ending 30 June 2029, for funding of $2,000,000 per annum (ex GST), with CPI indexation applied from the second year of the Term, capped at a maximum of 3.5% per annum, subject to the terms and conditions of the Deed as provided at Attachment 1; D. Note that funding will be paid in three instalments, with the second instalment subject to a performance-based adjustment of up to $350,000, based on Council’s assessment of performance against the Schedule 2 KPIs using the scoring methodology set out in Schedule 3; E. Note that failure to deliver Schedule 1 Agreed Obligations may constitute a breach of the Deed and is managed through the Deed’s compliance and governance provisions, separate from the performance adjustment framework; F. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to: i. Finalise and execute the Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029, including any minor or administrative amendments required; and ii. Administer the Deed in accordance with its terms. Amendment No. 1 Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Item C i. be added to read: i. Request the CEO prepare and publish a Destination Management Roles and Responsibilities Framework clearly defining the respective accountabilities of Council, Tourism Noosa and relevant agencies and that Tourism Noosa's Deed obligations and KPIs be reviewed against that Framework. Lost. For: Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips Against: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Page 12 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 Amendment No. 2 Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Item C i. be added to read: i. Amend the Deed to require Tourism Noosa deliver a Peak Demand Management Plan to Council by 31 December 2026, identifying high-pressure locations and periods, specifying actions within Tourism Noosa's direct control to manage visitor demand, distinguishing Tourism Noosa's actions from those requiring Council or other agencies, with annual progress reporting. Lost. For: Cr Amelia Lorentson Against: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Amendment No. 3 Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Item C i. be added to read: i. Amend Schedule 2 to include the following auditable marketing KPIs, verified annually through Tourism Noosa's advertising platform records be provided to Council as part of the Annual Outcome Report: No paid advertising targeting residents within 150 kilometres of Noosa. A measurable annual reduction in marketing activity directed at day-trip catchments. Lost. For: Cr Amelia Lorentson Against: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Tom Wegener That Council A. Note the report by the Chief Executive Officer to the General Committee dated 13 April 2026 and this Further Report to the General Committee dated 9 June 2026 regarding the Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029; B. Note that, in response to Council’s resolution of 16 April 2026, the Deed Schedules have been revised to: i. Separate Agreed Obligations and Deliverables (Schedule 1) from performance measures; ii. Introduce a Balanced Scorecard framework of KPIs in Schedule 2; and iii. Simplify the performance-based funding adjustment model in Schedule 3; C. Approve the revised Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029 with Tourism Noosa Ltd for a term of three (3) years, commencing 1 July 2026 and ending 30 June 2029, for funding of $2,000,000 per annum (ex GST), with CPI indexation applied from the second year of the Term, capped at a maximum of 3.5% per annum, subject to the terms and conditions of the Deed as provided at Attachment 1; Page 13 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 D. Note that funding will be paid in three instalments, with the second instalment subject to a performance-based adjustment of up to $350,000, based on Council’s assessment of performance against the Schedule 2 KPIs using the scoring methodology set out in Schedule 3; E. Note that failure to deliver Schedule 1 Agreed Obligations may constitute a breach of the Deed and is managed through the Deed’s compliance and governance provisions, separate from the performance adjustment framework; F. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to: i. Finalise and execute the Tourism Noosa Funding and Performance Deed 2026–2029, including any minor or administrative amendments required; and ii. Administer the Deed in accordance with its terms. Carried on the casting vote of the Chair. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips 7.13 NOOSA BIOSECURITY PLAN 2026-2031 Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Karen Finzel Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That Council: A. Note the report by the Coordinator Biosecurity to the General Committee dated 9 June 2026 for the Draft Noosa Biosecurity Plan 2026–2031; B. Approve the Draft Noosa Biosecurity Plan 2026–2031 provided at Attachment 2, for the purposes of community engagement; C. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to undertake community consultation on the Draft Noosa Biosecurity Plan 2026–2031 in accordance with Council’s Community Engagement Plan provided at Attachment 3; and D. Note that a further report will be presented to Council following completion of the community engagement process, including a summary of submissions and any proposed amendments to the Draft Noosa Biosecurity Plan 2026–2031. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Page 14 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 7.14 ENVIRONMENT & CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE GRANTS - ENVIRONMENT PROJECT GRANTS (ROUND 21), CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE GRANTS (ROUND 6) Cr Brian Stockwell "In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009 I inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this matter Item 7.14 - ENVIRONMENT & CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE GRANTS - ENVIRONMENT PROJECT GRANTS (ROUND 21), CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE GRANTS (ROUND 6) on this agenda as I am the current President of the Noosa Lions Football Club who submitted a grant application for a Climate Change Response Grant. Although I have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a reasonable person could have a perception of bias because the application submitted was unsuccessful and is not discussed in the report. I choose to remain in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting on whether I can remain and participate in the decision. After discussion and based on the CEO's advice I will leave the meeting room." Cr Brian Stockwell left the meeting. Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Amelia Lorentson Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That Cr Wegener be appointed as Acting Chairperson of the meeting for this item given the conflict of interest declaration by Cr Stockwell. Carried. For: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Cr Brian Stockwell having declared a conflict of interest was ineligible to vote. Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Jessica Phillips Seconded: Cr Nicola Wilson That General Committee Agenda Item 7.14 be referred to the Ordinary Meeting dated 18 June 2026 for 2 x further reports - separating the Environment Project Grants & Climate Change Response Grants. Carried. For: Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Cr Brian Stockwell having declared a conflict of interest was ineligible to vote. Cr Brian Stockwell returned to the meeting and resumed the Chair. 7.15 PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED BY DELEGATED AUTHORITY – APRIL 2026 Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Tom Wegener Page 15 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That Council note the report by the Development Assessment Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2026 regarding applications that have been decided by delegated authority for April 2026 as provided at Attachment 1 to the Report. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 8 CONFIDENTIAL SESSION 8.1 CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE - PROPOSED LAND RATIONALISATION - LANYANA WAY LOT 2 ON RP889596 AND NOOSA DRIVE LOT ON RP884396 CLOSURE OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC Procedural motion Moved: Cr Nicola Wilson Seconded: Cr Karen Finzel That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to section 254J(3)(g) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing a commercial matter proposed to be made by Council and in particular, the potential commercial negotiations in relation to Item 8.1 PROPOSED LAND RATIONALISATION - LANYANA WAY LOT 2 ON RP889596 AND NOOSA DRIVE LOT ON RP884396. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None REOPENING OF THE MEETING TO THE PUBLIC Procedural Motion Moved: Cr Tom Wegener Seconded: Cr Jessica Phillips That the meeting be re-opened to the public. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Brian Stockwell Seconded: Cr Amelia Lorentson That Council note the report from the Acting Property Manager to General Committee meeting dated 9 June 2026; and Page 16 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 A. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to provide landowner’s consent, if required, to enable lodgement of any future development application involving Councilowned land affected by the proposed Land Rationalisation Process; B. Note that the provision of landowner’s consent and the actions authorised under this resolution: do not constitute approval of any development application; do not bind or fetter Council in its role as assessment manager; do not commit Council to completing the land exchange; and do not authorise any works on, or transfer of, Council land prior to completion of all required approvals, agreements and settlement conditions. C. Note that the proposed Land Rationalisation Process: is intended to facilitate land tenure outcomes that support implementation of the Noosa Junction Framework and Character Plan; supports opportunities for future housing outcomes consistent with Council’s Housing Strategy and broader planning objectives; will result in no net loss of existing public parking; is intended to improve future access arrangements associated with the planned public road connection; and supports increased public realm and green space outcomes within the precinct. D. Agree to facilitate a land tenure rationalisation process involving: Council-owned land located at Lot 2 on RP889596, Noosa Heads, including a 363m² portion of the existing driveway; and adjoining land located at 99 Noosa Drive, Noosa Heads, Through a market value land exchange whereby: a 363m² portion of the existing driveway within Lot 2 on RP889596 is transferred to the adjoining landowner for amalgamation into the adjoining land; and part of the adjoining land is transferred to Council. E. Pursuant to section 236(2) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, resolve that the proposed disposal of part of Lot 2 on RP889596 proceed other than by tender or auction in reliance on the exception under section 236(1)(c)(v) of the Regulation, on the basis that: the consideration comprises land exchanged for land; the disposal is in the public interest; and the transaction is otherwise consistent with sound contracting principles. F. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to undertake all actions necessary to implement the Land Rationalisation Process, including: negotiating and entering into agreements; preparing and lodging survey plans; finalising Infrastructure Agreements; securing easements, access arrangements and road dedications; facilitating title and tenure arrangements; and completing the transfer of land interests. G. Note that all costs associated with the Land Rationalisation Process, including legal, valuation, surveying, lodgement and stamp duty costs, will be funded by the proponent. H. Note that any future development application affecting the subject land: will be assessed independently under the Planning Act 2016 by the relevant assessment manager; and Page 17 of 18 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING | 9 JUNE 2026 remains separate from the Land Rationalisation Process. Carried. For: Cr Brian Stockwell, Cr Karen Finzel, Cr Amelia Lorentson, Cr Jessica Phillips, Cr Tom Wegener, Cr Nicola Wilson Against: None 9 MEETING CLOSURE The meeting closed at 4.38pm. Page 18 of 18
Meeting Transcript
Brian Stockwell 00:00.000
We sit here on Kabi Kabi country where for many thousands of years Kabi Kabi looked after this place and it's part of our role to keep doing that on their behalf and we acknowledge the role of elders past, present and future for caring for country. We do have an apology so in attendance we have Councillor Wilson, Wegener, Lorentson, Councillor Finzel, and Councillor Phillips. Cllr and the Mayor has given his apology as he is officiating at a world environment day function which have state government representatives. To item 4 which is the confirmation of the General Committee Meeting minutes of May 2026. I think Councillor Phillips was the mover and Councillor Wegener was seconder. Do we have any discussion? I I've put the motion, all those in favour? No presentations nor do we have deputations so we move on to section 7 and item 1 in that section is the Peregian beach active street stage 1 progress update and next steps which was deferred from the Ordinary Meeting dated 19th of March 2026. Item 12.2 if we can invite the relevant staff to the table. Shaun Walsh 01:32.400
Good morning Councillors. Good morning. Procedure I just want to firstly table three items to be attached to the Minutes of the meeting. These have been distributed in advance to the meeting to the Councillors. Attachment one is an update on background to the action. March report, including updates from the liveability survey as well as program to inform councillors' decision. Attachment two, which was requested by Councillors, is a rundown of councillors' involvement in the Peregian Beach active street from the original project inception that goes in some detail. And then attachment three is a confidential attachment, which just further documents community submissions and requests that were received since the March report, so Councillors have a full rundown of all submissions received from the community about the project. I'll table that at the meeting. Then I'll hand over to Lindsay to give the overview of the project obviously. Lindsay 02:31.861
Thank you Sean. Good morning Councillors. This report provides a project status update and recommendation for the Peregian Beach active street stage including background to the project, an outline of findings from recent community engagement and current project parameters. The project is 100% funded through the South East Queensland liveability fund and active transport fund. To date the project is has undergone extensive planning and consultation, which started in 2020 with the coastal pathway corridor study. The reviewed existing paths, identified safety gaps and assessed possible routes, while ensuring community alignment through project reference. It was further analysed in the 2021 Noosa cycling and walking strategy and implementation plan, whereby the community was invited to have their say and similar engagement with a Project Reference Group was carried out. The 2022 Noosa liveability survey highlighted the community's desire for improved active transport across the Shire. Project specific activities included three public pop-up information sessions April and May of 2025, multiple Councillor briefing workshops in 2025 a pop-up at the Boreen Point Ordinary Meeting in November 2025, two further January of this year, a public workshop in February and numerous one-on meetings with representative groups and impacted residents. Feedback on the Peregian Beach Active Street project was mixed. While the majority of questions and points raised by Jessica Phillips 04:03.882
Residents in group discussions were harshly negative towards the project, many residents and stakeholders supported the underlying core objectives such as slower Kerri Contini 04:12.882
Traffic, safer pedestrian movements and improved walking Jessica Phillips 04:16.057
And cycling connections. Report includes extensive attachments in the form of community feedback on the proposal. As a result of the extensive consultation and ensuing feedback, a number of changes have been proposed to the initial design response. The report also seeks in principle Lindsay 04:34.692
Support for continuing to invest in stage two subject to future budget allocation to achieve connectivity to the Peregian beach village and an investment in a broader education and awareness program on the benefits of active transport to support delivery of the Shire-wide coastal pathway corridor a key component of councils cycling and walking strategy. The Peregian beach active street project addresses long-standing issues with existing south Peregian beach infrastructure. It resolves the current parking congestion caused by vehicles lining both sides of the road which has effectively created-way traffic situation. The project delivers a safe and dedicated pedestrian pathway ensuring residents and visitors no longer need to walk on the roadway to reach their destination. Design incorporates traffic calming measures and reduced vehicle speeds, improvements previously requested by the community, improved stormwater and improve stormwater infrastructure kerb and channel for better stormwater management. We acknowledge that not all residents share the same view of the project, Jessica Phillips 05:35.280
However we respectfully ask Councillors to consider the full range of safety, accessibility Lindsay 05:40.382
Infrastructure when making their decision today and the long term value this project represents for the wider community. Brian Stockwell 05:48.543
Thank you. Thanks. Amelia Lorentson 05:51.843
We have questions for Councillor Lorentson. Lorentson? States that approximately $150,000 has been spent to date. Can staff confirm the exact amount of expenditure data across the country? Liveability fund and active transport fund and whether any of that expenditure would need to be repaid if the fund to the funding bodies if the project does not proceed. SPEAKER_17 06:24.603
Funds So the active transport fund only the construction side of things so most of the expenditure today would be towards the liveability and yeah it's my understanding Aidan if this project doesn't go ahead then we would have to be up for the cost. SPEAKER_15 06:38.514
Yes we probably have to get back to you on the exact expenditure to date as it's sort of moving on each week and could be required to pay back that grant funding if the project didn't go ahead we would be seeking I guess a change of scope from the grant body to fund the design works to date but we'd have to come back to you on that. Amelia Lorentson 07:11.780
Can you cancel that too? So Council resolves not to proceed with the act of street design as can you just explain what alternative projects or works would be eligible for funding under the South East Queensland liveability fund criteria and you sort of mention in the report is it streetscape footpath and infrastructure improvements. Shaun Walsh 07:40.006
The grant criteria for the South East Queensland liveability fund was about collaboration with our neighbours to create regional benefits and the pitch for this one is it connected in with the Sunshine Coast pathway. Showed direct regional benefits of people moving between our Shire and to Sunshine Coast area and vice versa so that's the key criteria. It has a fairly broad criteria other project funded under that is also the Cooroy Sports Complex upgrade which is actually operating as a regional facility providing gymnastics for a broader region than just Cooroy. So it's a fairly broad criteria to say whether it could be transferred to other projects or not, I don't know the answer to that. Brian Stockwell 08:28.980
Questions? Amelia Lorentson 08:33.920
Okay, I'm happy to move. Sorry, I do have quite a few questions but the last one I'll ask today is that recommendation be asked Council to delegate authority to the CEO to finalise and construction contract including all variations within the approved budget. Given that the budget reconciliation is not complete, so what safeguards are in place to ensure that the Council that we're not exposing ourselves any financial risk beyond the grant funding? Do you want me to answer that? Shaun Walsh 09:11.692
Yes. So, our Council operates in support of the capital works program, executive. Which is made up of delegates from the Councillors and the CEO, where final project. Costs and scope are presented to delegates to the CWE. Those Council delegates and the CEO can always refer matters to the general Council. So, our governance terms around the Capital Works Executive fundamentally support what you've asked for. To actually ensure that they're safeguarded in terms of scope and expenditure. Amelia Lorentson 09:42.235
So, does that. Probably the question I'm really asking is in terms of government's oversight. Are we satisfied that there will be enough Council oversight, given that we're unsure how much over budget this project may potentially cost? Shaun Walsh 10:01.143
So I think that the Capital Works Executive is actually a really good exemplar of corporate governance. So it's made up of the executive of Council and three elected members. So can also defer things to the full Council if they're uncomfortable making a recommendation or proceeding with expenditure within the delegation of the CEO. Jessica Phillips 10:22.503
Just in relation to the community engagement and the broader Shire-wide awareness campaign, can you explain to me is there a budget for that, who will pay for that sort of campaign? I know that it says there's collaboration with QPS and TMR, but just wanting to know at what stage that's at. Shaun Walsh 10:41.191
Yeah, so remember that this report was prepared back in March, ideally because the matter's been deferred and we didn't presume to actually proceed with a budget initiative. So, but on the event that this is decided to Council to proceed, we'd be looking to actually fund it out of the Sustainable Transport Levy, which is geared up towards actually actively encouraging people for active transport movement, so, and there's a report scheduled for the next round of meetings for Council about the Go Noosa Program and also the movement and connection plan. So we have a funding mechanism but Council still need to decide that they wanted to use that funding mechanism for that program. Amelia Lorentson 11:26.526
When I read the report, there seemed to be a lot of uncertainty, lots of investigate, explore, principle support. My questions: what parts of the project are actually clear and confirmed? What's still unknown? And what safeguards are in place so that if there is a decision today. Support the recommendation that it's not interpreted later as full approval of the project in its current. Of the current concept? SPEAKER_15 12:02.982
So I suppose through the PCJ and the CWE governance process. The project team has been working within the approved scope. As part of the community consultation, it became evident that additional works were required for this to be supported by the community and to fulfil the community's requests. That work is outside of the approved scope. And so in this report, we propose to investigate doing that additional work. Noting that we would take any of scopes the additional scope through the CWE for approval. So I suppose that's probably where we investigate rather than include in the scope straight away. Subject to budget approval. We'll also be seeking, we've received an extension of time from the funding bodies since this report was prepared in March. If this recommendations are approved, we would seek a change of scope through the grant funding bodies as well, in the hope that they would fund the additional work. So we're also leaving the door open there, I suppose. Other channels of funding for that additional scope. Thank you. Karen Finzel 13:25.733
This is a really complex matter and I'm glad that it's been clearly articulated today that we need to widen the scope of this study, especially addressing, you know, whether the community have had, you know, conflicting ideas around this and there's been a lot of conversation around that process in terms of the changes scoped. This study that you talk about. What does that require today? Do we need a an amendment or motion to this to seek that Through the Chair to the CEO or is that just going to automatically roll over and move into that scope without us making a decision? Around that today. Shaun Walsh 14:09.452
Under the terms of reference for the Capital Works Executive, which consists of three Councillors and the executive, every time there's a change of project scope, we actually have to report it through to ensure that there's that control. So the resolution B, delegated authority to the CEO, allows the CEO to present all the matters for their first consideration. Brian Stockwell 14:36.140
Can I, if I can just clarify, there's some of the, from recollection, the scope change included doing more works in adjacent streets to avoid the concerns about rat running, was there other scope changes of any significance? SPEAKER_15 14:53.180
Yeah, so for example, the local area traffic management in neighbouring streets, design work is required to understand the total cost for construction. We haven't undertaken that additional design work as yet, noting that would come out of council's costs if this project didn't go ahead. So we put that on pause. We've got quotes to do that work, and that's the sort of further investigation. The other scope is looking at car parking, additional car parking, realignment of car parks through victory park. What else is in there? I think it's covered on page 2 of the report. Shaun Walsh 15:33.041
The softer colour palette. SPEAKER_15 15:38.781
So increased formalised car parking, investigating softer colour palettes. Widening of the existing ball through loro keefe park. Inclusion of additional street tree planting. Additional signage. U-turn movements at loro keefe drive and pudder street. So intersection design investigations. Brian Stockwell 16:10.320
Thank you. Did you say there was a supplementary? Karen Finzel 16:13.840
Oh yeah there was, just following on for that. Thank you for that in terms of like what the scope would address with further investigation. Where that does it address the process of community engagement? Further community engagement around that? Where does it go back to community after you've done that scope? Because that's about infrastructure and expenditure. Shaun Walsh 16:36.539
How do we address the community? So all our programs have ongoing community engagement. That's how we set up a significant database. Of digital door knocks and community updates. So we'll continue to ratify that. Operate that program. Some of the design interventions will require some discussion with specific residents lot. We've been very attuned to one-on meetings. As documented in the attachments to the report that outline how many on-site meetings we've had with various people and we'll continue with that program. Jessica Phillips 17:12.385
Thank you. Just in relation to okay, so post-capital work's grant funded, I'd love to be able to understand, transferring it into OPEC's budget, what the cost of maintenance and ongoing, if that was done as part of any scope. The residents can understand the ongoing cost to Shaun Walsh 17:38.027
Probably can't answer that. Is that we have a number of failed assets in that streetscape, including some of the pavements as well as the kerb and chain link, so which is already costing us in terms of maintenance quite significantly maintain that in a reasonable order, say that the actual assets have failed in terms of when you renew an asset, like replacing asphalt and kerb and chain link, the initial access rate is actually fairly low, so we actually anticipate that the asset maintenance cost will actually reduce. Over the initial years of the asset we have an asset renewal budget for asphalt and kerb and channelling and footpaths which is applied to our budget every year and that renewal budget is prioritised so I actually think that this is a bit of an interesting case because you know we don't have a footpath kerb and channelling which is probably fit for purpose anymore we've got failed pavement so there will be asset maintenance costs which should have already been there and these are fairly standard asset classes the only one that would might be a bit different is probably the street pavement colouration and applying a specific cost for that but that's a technique we use elsewhere in the Shire and have a specific line mark in the budget. Brian Stockwell 18:51.599
Cancel loans and interest. Amelia Lorentson 18:53.199
Terms of active street projects, I am I understand the project down in Caloundra has been paused and I received information on active street projects overseas in cambridge and UK. Can you give us an example where it has worked successfully? SPEAKER_15 19:13.983
Yeah, sure. So the active street that we've designed or worked with the consultants to design is based off feedback that's come out of WA. They rolled out a program of 10 to 15 active streets. And then put together some guidelines based on their learnings of what went well and what didn't and part way through design one of the changes we made was the additional speed bumps or local area traffic management chicanes and that sort of thing which was based off the got from WA so I think they're probably happy to share some of those examples which I think we've put in some of the material is available on council's website as Shaun Walsh 19:59.035
Well and also influenced by this hedges Avenue in the Gold Coast which do access the one-way street and also a shared bikeway experience if you ever use the Gold Coast ocean road. It's a much earlier version of the method but it's regarded highly successful by the residents when they're actually riding on the Gold Coast from surfers paradise to Burleigh. They actively use shared street experience in the cycles. I think if you actually look at our FAQs on our project website, we've actually referenced examples from around Australia of active streets used. Amelia Lorentson 20:37.872
Just in terms of the community feedback, did we separate when we collated all that information and or understand which feedback came from those directly impacted, those living in south cooridgen, and can we. And what was the overwhelming response where they supportive or objecting of the proposal, Shaun Walsh 21:12.790
I can't think we can answer that Councillor than then we have provided copies in the attachments to the report of every submission received and every bit of feedback for you to make an assessment of yourself about community distaste or support for the proposal. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 21:31.109
Any other questions? I'm happy to move. Amelia Lorentson 21:35.672
My last question, it's probably a question I'm going to be asking for every report in terms of fees spent on consultants. Do we have an idea of how much? We've in preparing this report and the information attached? And again, a question I'll probably ask with every report, could it have been done in-house? SPEAKER_15 22:04.639
Have the exact cost for the consultancy. I remember when we got the proposal, it was much cheaper than we expected, so it's definitely a value for money design, so that's done through ADG consultants. We potentially do that in-house, but it would take up most of our design resources for a significant part of their time, so we'd be very limited in how much work we could do outside of that project, what we've done is we allocate a designer to review the plans when they come in, and then they can spend more time on other projects, so sort of trying to get the best yield out of our team, small Shaun Walsh 22:47.583
It's fair to say that the vast majority of costs are actually internal staff costs. The project management, the design review, and also the stakeholder engagement, they weren't outsourced, they're all in-housed. It was just supported by that external design expertise to document the plans. So, and that's consistent with the model, you know, when we have a CapitalWorks program between 50 and 60 million. And we have to figure out how do we enable the design to occur in the most efficient process. SPEAKER_17 23:12.314
And in regards to the report as well, it was done in-house. There might have been like a few advice we received from traffic and transport engineers, but that was mainly in-house. Thank you. Kerri Contini 23:22.977
Just one final question, if that's alright. Jessica Phillips 23:25.077
When looking at the design, was it ever challenged if the grant never existed, what the actual needs of that community is? Talking about the infrastructure that's ageing. If the Council were to just fund the project purely from our. CapEx budget, would the design potentially be the same or different because of the grant? Shaun Walsh 23:57.263
Probably the first thing to note is that if we proceeded with resealing the whole of that road, we're actually going to increase vehicle speed because at the moment the patchy the pavement is actually slowing vehicles down. And we've also got liability issues associated with vehicles parking on both sides of the street, causing one-way congestion and inability for cars to traverse through, and pedestrians walking on the road because there's no choice. So we could roll out a conventional program underneath a capital works program with a footpath and a kerb and channelling and a road, but it actually wouldn't solve the issues that the residents are facing at the moment. So this is about future-proofing the design for generations to come. SPEAKER_15 24:36.718
I can just add to that the corridor assessment that was done in 2021 was based on trying to find the best corridor route and the best treatment option, regardless of how it was funded. So that was used on the basis for the grant funding. Sean said, we could do a kerb renewal, an asphalt renewal program, if we wanted to go through and just do a pathway, it's likely that we'd end up with a very similar result in some of the spots where we've taken a pathway, the roadside kerb and adjusting the kerb around to save some trees or to avoid retaining walls or underground services, so the footpath design would be pretty similar to what we've got as an active street design if we went and just did the footpath by itself. Brian Stockwell 25:23.951
Okay, I'll move the staff recommendation. Seconded by Councillor Wegener. So Councillor, this has been an extensive process and you see the documents were tabled this morning dating back to the corridor study back six years ago where this was selected. It is a project that's created a lot of community discussion, both concerns and support think our decision is based on something that the Director has highlighted that this is a project that was prioritised based on its regional significance so what we have to balance up is both the local very specific concerns and support within that area that is subject to construction but also the broader Shire-wide and regional implications of the project as such I'm going to refer to the letter we received from the Sunshine Coast bicycle users group because I think it makes a really good summation of where I think the key areas for support for the motion are. So for those who don't know advocates for safe, accessible, active they have said they've carefully reviewed the bridging active street proposal and believe it delivers substantial benefits not just for cyclists and pedestrians but for the entire Peregian Beach community and the broader regional active transport network. So the bicycle users committee have people from local to Noosa who have many years experience in active transport planning the writer of this particular letter had many years in state government at some of the highest levels so they were very knowledgeable and their summation was the project represents exactly the kind of evidence-based forward-thinking infrastructure investment that our region desperately needs they suggest it is the right project in the right location at the right time it addresses a critical gap in the regional active transport network delivers measurable road safety improvement for all users provides public health and environmental benefits enhances property values and neighbourhood amenity improves equity and accessibility for all community members and is supported by robust evidence and professional planning so for me their argument is contrived. Convincing and I think it supports what staff have been telling us through this process therefore I believe that our support is to proceed to the next step. Take advantage of the significant grant funds available to achieve not just renewal but the upgrade of assets that are currently unsafe. Poor condition and do not either the local community or the users of the beach or the cycle network at all well. Amelia Lorentson 28:41.504
Question to the chief and maybe a CEO. I had understood that we determine if there was any influence in terms of the mayor's conflict that needed to be determined before we could proceed to the recommendation. Can I seek clarification please. My understanding was that was important because the decision for the Councillors was to determine whether or not the recommendation that's before us today should proceed or whether it has been compromised if there is any influence was exerted by the Mayor that led to this decision. Again just clarity I'm confused why we've progressed with the recommendation without that determination. Larry Sengstock 29:37.301
So I think as we know that matter is still being determined, it's still in process so we don't have a final response but I think it's up to the group, the Councillors to decide whether that is potentially a consideration or not or they're two separate matters in terms of whether there was or wasn't but getting that any response or any determination of that has not been known. Not been received at this point in time. Brian Stockwell 30:15.287
If I could just add, I didn't recirculate the legal advice that we received on the 18th of March just before the meeting. We bound by confidence in that matter, but the key impact of it was that the suggestion is it should have a negative impact on council's futures deliberation. I think the question was more about the OIA. Is an assessment of an individual Councillor, it's not council's procedures. The OIA, the matter has been referred to the OIA and that's respectable. With to Councillor Wilkie, they will not give guidance about conduct. Respect Jessica Phillips 30:57.976
I have some questions that probably that I see Diana is in the room but I am wondering whether or not I can ask them given that we're not in confidential but I would like to write. That just to cover what how I feel about it so well if Brian Stockwell 31:23.112
There is matters that want to go to legal opinion then we should actually move into a confidential session so is your questions likely to go to a legal opinion would you like to move the motion to go into committee? We'll just get the right wording. SPEAKER_17 31:45.768
That might not be the correct wording, so are you moving it in for reasons not to discuss Brian Stockwell 31:58.204
No, I don't think that would be the right reason. It would be discuss matter that's subject to confidential legal advisement. Larry Sengstock 32:14.404
I have to SPEAKER_17 32:16.464
Get it out of here. Jessica Phillips 34:05.380
We're yes, that the meeting be closed to the public for sure to section 254J3E of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the purpose of discussing legal advice obtained by the local government for item 7.1, Peregian Beach, active street. Brian Stockwell 34:21.540
I move Councillor Phillips, seconded by Councillor Lorentson. All those in favour? That's unanimous. So all those of you who aren't staff or Councillors, I ask you to move outside and we'll open the doors again when the. Jessica Phillips 01:14:07.832
I know. To do some grounding. I know. It's very important. SPEAKER_17 01:14:11.972
It's very, really is. Bring you back into the room. Give us a little release there. Tom Wegener 01:14:16.152
Yeah, this do it. Paisley. I'll come for that. SPEAKER_17 01:14:25.112
I'll give you my Facebook phone number. Brian Stockwell 01:14:28.252
Thank you. We're right, so welcome back. Councillors. We have a motion in front of us and only I have talked to it. Do we have other Councillors wishing to talk? Councillor Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 01:14:56.700
I'd like to remove some amendments please. First is delete B of the recommendation. And replace it with B, that any construction contract for the Peregian beach active street stage 1 project is there any more voting? For the Peregian Beach strip. SPEAKER_17 01:15:54.741
Active street stage 1 project be brought back I've just got to mark the changes as opposed to what it is. So we're not doing that. Any construction contracts for Bridget and apple street. Amelia Lorentson 01:16:27.720
Be brought back to Council for approval and that no contract be awarded until all outstanding design matters identified in this report have been resolved and vote reported to Council Brian Stockwell 01:17:02.141
And cancel that, I would think your additions would also require that to delete the last clause after the comma is that right yep thank you do we have a seconder for the amendment? Councillor Phillips a second Councillor Lorentson Amelia Lorentson 01:17:34.360
Sort of raised this before in terms of when I read the report there was just a lot of uncertainty the investigating principle support etc so lots of unresolved design issues have been identified in the report and they include the pitta street intersection the land tenure south of Warwick quay park, parkland investigations you know how much many car parks we're going to lose CPTED safety concerns and I just think it's prudent don't think we should be delegating the contract award authority to the CEO before these matters are resolved and if we do that it just basically removes Council from the decision entirely and given the level of community concern I think we should retain oversight of the decision rather than handed off and that's why I'm putting forward this amendment. Nicola Wilson 01:18:51.260
I think I understand the intent but I'm just not sure it's the appropriate way to deal with that because all contracts are signed by the CEO. We don't have any authority to do that so whether it's through the contract or whether it's just appropriate through the CWE process and then the CWE can elect to bring back to Council at the time. I just don't think we can be involved in a contract. Amelia Lorentson 01:19:32.100
Can I clarify that the amendment is not about contract, it's about resolving outstanding design matters identified in the report. That those have got to be resolved and brought back to Council before we go out to contract. Larry Sengstock 01:19:55.181
No, I don't, Nicola Wilson 01:19:57.520
I'm just saying the contract is coming for a very long time. Brian Stockwell 01:20:10.660
So the initial B was in order to extra delivery project completion by the quiet state and Federal grant funding timeframes. Well I think the advice previously has been that you can't guarantee any extension. Are we likely to be, if this is to proceed, having a very short timeframe to the get this awarded? Shaun Walsh 01:20:42.496
Firstly council's meeting cycle would make this quite difficult so to meet deadlines and the grant deadlines we'd have to call a Special Meeting to keep that rolling. I'm also concerned that any intent to not award a construction contract would be disingenuous to the market. So about going to market and something that the Council doesn't want an award. It doesn't put us in a good reputation in terms of the construction industry at the moment and it's incredibly competitive terms of pricing. But you know I think that to me if the report noted that regular reports will be provided through the formal CWE process and you know advised of councils like updating on progress that's standard process and I'm very happy for the resolution to read that. Could I request that you drop me with the wording then please. So my thought process is that B should stay as is. But we could add the additional words noting regular updates through council's Capital Works Executive process to the full Council. Amelia Lorentson 01:21:56.100
Okay, and that will be shared amongst councillors. All the Councillors not all of us sit on this CWE. Shaun Walsh 01:22:01.999
Yes I'm happy to commit to that because there are matters that we regularly do update the full Council that come through Capital Works Executive because we think it's in the best full Council thank you Amelia Lorentson 01:22:11.863
I'm happy with that amendment Brian Stockwell 01:22:14.063
Yeah so we have to deal with this one first anyone else wish to talk to the amendment I put the amendment those in favour that's Councillor Lorentson and those against that's Councillor Wilson, Wegener, dindal, Phillips and Stockwell is there another amendment Amelia Lorentson 01:22:33.583
Yep so stay with B maybe be project completion by the required state and Federal grant funding time frames and note that Brian Stockwell 01:22:49.003
I wrote down the words noting regular updates through the Capital Works Executive process and that this be distributed to all Councillors i've quickly, haven't I? Thank you. Councillor Phillips is seconded. SPEAKER_17 01:23:18.641
I'll just check the wording for you. Shaun Walsh 01:23:33.080
Sure. Dean. The B is intended to remain as is, but this is additional wording. I don't think so. Brian Stockwell 01:23:49.400
So beginning of that? Is that the end of that? Did I miss the beginning of it? Shaun Walsh 01:23:52.840
Yeah, what I noted is that the B should stay as is with this additional wording. That's true. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 01:24:05.828
No, I think you've Amelia Lorentson 01:24:07.208
Gone to a different one. No, it's B, please, not C. Delegate authority to the CEO to finalise, negotiate, award the construction contract for the Peregian Beach active street stage 1 project, including approval of all contract variations within the approved project budget for the purpose of project expediting delivery enabling project completion by the required state and Federal grant funding timeframes and noting that regular updates through the Capital Works Executive process will be distributed to all Councillors. Happy I'll be at your move, thank you. Brian Stockwell 01:25:35.640
Councillor Phillips. Phillips. Cancellation. Councillor Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 01:25:49.160
I won't read or write what I've just said before, but I just think in terms of governance that we must ensure that we discharge our governance obligations in terms of oversight and in the context of this issue is of huge community concern. Brian Stockwell 01:26:07.800
Wish to talk to the amendment? Karen Finzel 01:26:11.720
Just seeking clarification the process around how we're going to do the regular updates given we do get the Minutes post those meetings is that another process that would be introduced? Shaun Walsh 01:26:29.405
I think we could so the Minutes are distributed from the Capital Works Executive but I certainly think we can be more forward and you know being really clear about the nature of discussion and being much more fuller in the Minutes to ensure that it addresses all of these scope items so can commit to providing much fuller minutes or much further clarity on all of these outstanding design issues. And you could for example if there was reports or plans you went to CWE later. We can certainly distribute so I can certainly commit to be fully sharing. Not just the Minutes, but the reports and the or commitment of scope as outlined in this report. So the current minutes are not what I'm referring to, it's actually providing much fuller information. It'd be another report? Not a report, an update or a briefing. Just emails? Yeah. To supplement the distribution of the Minutes. Brian Stockwell 01:27:27.840
The wish to discuss. Closing, those Councillor Lorentson? No. in favour? That's unanimous. So that becomes the substantive motion. Councillor Phillips? Jessica Phillips 01:27:44.492
I just have an amendment to D. And I've just sent it to Cathy. Okay, one second, I'll just. How did you send it to me? Just by email I thank I sent two, but the one at 11:24 SPEAKER_17 01:28:14.940
Is this an extra item? Jessica Phillips 01:28:17.680
No, just taking out D and changing D. Similar wording, but I've just rewritten it and included something. I'll read it out. Of an active street and coastal pathway awareness and education campaign across the Shire. Any implementation of the campaign must be subject to formal endorsement by the department of transport, Main Roads, TMR and Queensland Police Service including confirmation that the proposed messaging, signage and enforcement approach align with relevant legislation and road safety requirements. That's all. Brian Stockwell 01:29:19.310
Yeah, exactly. Once again, Cathy, you've deleted the roll. Amelia Lorentson 01:29:23.780
I oh, the one I've crossed out. SPEAKER_17 01:29:26.760
Doing that. It's not me. Brian Stockwell 01:29:33.320
Okay, do we have a Lorentson. Councillor Phillips. Jessica Phillips 01:29:38.932
I think is this is pretty straightforward for me. Whenever we're looking at education or campaigns that are road related, I think it's really important that it aligns with the governing bodies that are there to fulfil legislative enforcement and action that would be required once changes to roads. It's not a Council thing to go and do compliance around the streets. Ultimately, I just think that anything should always align with whatever the messaging is coming from the other two bodies that oversee it shouldn't change the intent too much of D, it's just adding that I think they should be, it should align with they would endorse in safety and strategies with road safety. Brian Stockwell 01:30:30.174
Anyone else wish to talk to the amendment? You want to argue with yourself to close? Not particularly. Okay, I've put the motion of the amendment. And that's carried unanimously. It becomes part of the motion. We've have got any other Councillors wishing to talk to the motion as it stands? Nicola Wilson 01:31:02.380
In the report and some of the discussion today we've heard about potential reputational risk with funders if the project doesn't go ahead. But I'm more concerned with reputational risk in our community if we proceed with a many affected residents are against. The can also be looked at another way when Council makes a submission for a project before community consultation without knowing if the project will be supported by the community and therefore whether a lot of the money is actually needed. Project is not the State government could have allocated funds elsewhere I do not feel compelled to continue the project just to save face with funders even though I do understand that risk but I do want to support residents and their many voices while I'm comfortable with the intent of a project to improve liveability and safety applying for active transport funding meant the outcome was predetermined before community consultation. In the report it says the Peregian beach active street project was scored in the 201 to 300 priority band moderate within the Walking and Cycling Strategy it was initially not scheduled in the 10-year implementation plan however opportunistic grant funding to align with regional liveability and active transport provided impetus for grant submission the concept of opportunistic funding concerns me grant money from state and Federal governments is not free money it's taxpayers money and we don't have unlimited access to it hence this project covering only 800 metres without any commitment to further stages to access the village grants also don't cover maintenance over the life of the asset ratepayers do so I'm concerned about this project being so highly prioritised just to be able to access funding without first getting community some of the works like the stormwater and road repairs and the kerb and channelling can be taken under council's capital works program without the need for the cycle path or loss of a parking. A petition was formally tabled with about parking loss traffic congestion safety and requested that the project be halted entirely requests for additional consultation and route options review there's been extensive community consultation and I thank everyone involved with that pop-ups workshops surveys submissions petition one-on meetings but the feedback from the affected residents has been overwhelmed overwhelmingly negative there is support for some aspects street repairs traffic calming but generally not the active street treatment those groups in favour don't live in the affected streets. While I understand the concerns over losing grant money I just don't think that outweighs the concerns and risks that residents have raised and there needs to be much more transparency over the design and route before I can support this. Brian Stockwell 01:33:47.320
Thank you, other Councillors? Amelia Lorentson 01:34:03.260
I'm happy to speak to this. I will not be supporting the report and I'm going to explain it on the basis of what residents have actually told us. This is not a debate about whether Peregian beach should have better footpaths, improved streetscapes or safer pedestrian infrastructure. Residents support that. They pay rates for exactly that. Good streetscape investment should happen regardless of this project and regardless of today's outcome. That's not what is in dispute. Is whether this specific design an active street project on these residential streets in south Peregian has been properly assessed, consulted on and properly justified. One resident that I've spoken to has attended every consultation session, every pop-up, coffee chat, every walk shop. She's written to me in detail. She has never previously opposed a Council proposal. She's showed up every step of the way on this particular project because this project directly affects her family's daily life, their safety, property access and, in her words, their liveability. We've also received correspondence summarising the views of over 94 people surveyed locally. 62 residents in south Peregian, more than 30 from Peregian springs. Of those, only two supported the project. Councillors, this is not a divided community. This is an overwhelming signal that something's, that has gone wrong in how this project has been developed and presented. When I read the report before us, it gave, in my opinion, it gave prominent weight to submissions from cycling advocacy organisations. Those have voice but they do not live in the streets. They won't be affected by the daily reality of reduced parking, constrained road widths or a path design that raises genuine safety concerns for children walking to school. Their support report also proposes to address safety concerns raised repeatedly by residents through additional signage and speed humps. When I read that I've got to be honest, I wasn't inspired by confidence. Signage doesn't Resolve conflicts created by the physical layout of a constrained shared space. It doesn't CPTED concerns about site lights throughout lorikey park that were raised by residents' children and it appears not properly escalated within the project team. We've been advised in the report that more than half of the grant funding can be reallocated to other projects if this design does not proceed. That's significant. It means we're not facing a binary choice between this proposal and nothing. There is a genuine alternative. Redirect the funds, do the streetscape work residents actually want and go back to the drawing board on the root question with a process the community can trust. The risk of proceeding as proposed is not just a design risk. It's a public trust risk. This community has watched the consultation process with less than 24 hours notice for the first information session. They've attended meetings during work hours and raised concerns that were not recorded or escalated. They've asked for survey data and not received it. Proceeding now on this report sends a message that none of that matters. And finally, I'm going to just add, when we see this level of conflict from a project, it should have told us something. We've had petitions, we've had formal objections. We've had residents attending every single consultation session. A community that kept showing up at every session, kept raising the same concerns and kept being told the project was again generates this much opposition this early from people it's directly intended to serve, something Councillors have gone wrong. Not with the residents, with the process. There was general no genuine community buy-in. Not because this community is difficult or opposed to progress. They've told us clearly what they want and what they're willing to support but they were never brought along. Decisions were made, funding secured, designs developed then the community was consulted. That's not how trust is built. The people most affected by this project are residents of south Peregian who will live with it every day, whose street amenity, parking, safety and access will be changed. Most of them have said that they've been least heard throughout this entire process. That's not good enough and it's not what this Council should be endorsing today. Our job is not to deliver projects to deliver outcomes community actually wants and needs. Those are not always the same thing. We work for our residents they do not work for us. I ask that everyone really think about supporting this recommendation in front of us. I'm sorry, not I don't know if he's supporting it Brian Stockwell 01:40:12.947
Thank you. Anyone wish to speak to the motion? Jessica Phillips 01:40:20.242
I'm going to just really briefly, because I didn't write anything down. So I've just been listening to the conversation and also the confidential session as well that had on it. I love a good plan I think it's really important to have plans to help us stay on track. I think community have made it pretty clear that they would prefer some outcomes rather than more. Plans I guess is what I hear a lot of but it ultimately when I sit back and listen it always comes down to like a process that gets us in this position and we hear constantly that assets are failing and renewal and we need to maintain what we currently have and then I think what happens is that it gets traction and we think okay there's a grant for that we've just got to change the scope to apply for the grant and I wonder if we just should maybe think if we were just spending our money because I'm with Councillor Wilson taxpayers pay our grants anyway so it's not like it's coming out of our pocket anyway so I don't I try to think okay actually even if it's a grant which has helped that's one thing but it shouldn't be the only thing it should be whether this was identified as a critical piece of work there's ageing assets but maybe we should listen to what I constantly hear which is just go back to the basics and fix what we don't need shiny the community just wants some basics done and maybe that would help take away some of the time delays in building a plan that fits a grant and we could have just got on with it and fixed the basics so I think loud and clear I hear it every day this community they were just like the simple things well and done right and done in time rather than waiting for money to be you know from state it just to me isn't where we should be looking great if we've got it and it comes part of the process later on but the very first buy-in should be the community that are most impacted by any project that we deliver and I don't think that they felt buy-in and I think it's got a broader. It becomes a broader issue when it comes to reputational damage on us as a Council because we're not taking our community on our journey with us they're being left behind and saying can you just come back to where we're at so unfortunately today I won't be supporting the active street in front of us. Brian Stockwell 01:43:24.678
Councillors? Karen Finzel 01:43:30.498
I'll speak quickly look this has been a very complex situation but throughout this term I mean I think this has been not something that we're unfamiliar with I think we sit at a point in time where governance for social impact is very much on the local and political agenda I think what's happened now that I think process and systems are not currently aligned with where our community wants to go. Our social responsibility and we are here to measure that today how that impact affects all of us including how we reach our community health and well-being how support environmental sustainability and how we actively address social issues in support of our local communities and legitimise their voice in the space I think we're at a discord right now where there's a misalignment between our aspirations of community where we'd like to be and where we arrive so that is the challenge that I think is as leaders in our community have been voted here to find that balance to give equity to all I think this is a challenging decision before us for all the matters that were raised around the table I think we have to constantly be asking the question the social impact examine ecosystem to lead effective board governance and I just think that's the challenge I know we've got decisions around how we spend the money how we deliver the new infrastructure how we listen to the people how we best provide leadership for our broader community and the other complexities that for legal matters we not bring into the table today but have to be worthy of our consideration leaders in this community so I'd like to enclose in fact everybody who has contributed to this process to the first was the community that turned up to the staff for the work that they've provided to the funding opportunities that have been presented. Yeah I think we have to look at risks versus opportunities and what sits before us today is a very challenging decision but thank you everyone for their input. Amelia Lorentson 01:46:18.087
Can I ask a question please? Just a question. Just in terms of if the recommendation doesn't proceed today the South East Queensland liveability fund and active transport fund, will Council be determining whether there are still opportunities to for Council to still use that funding. I think it's partial funding, about $800,000. Will Council determine whether that available grant funding can be reallocated to deliver infrastructure improvements that a community actually want if this recommendation falls through today? Shaun Walsh 01:47:09.330
I I'll have to take that on notice Councillor Lorentson one of the thoughts would active transport fund the footpath? That's a reasonable ask. Could the South East Queensland living fund be transferred across to the other program that we've got running? They're reasonable questions, but I'll have to take that on notice and provide further advice to Council. Amelia Lorentson 01:47:28.247
I maybe rephrase that question then? So in terms of actual risk, so there's $880,000 from the South East Queensland liveability fund and there's $785 active transport fund. Which is at risk and which can be reallocated to other projects, infrastructure Shaun Walsh 01:47:52.851
I can't speak on behalf of the funding providers. They may elect to not redistribute any of that funding and redistribute it to other grant funders across the State. You know, we can ask the question, but I can't give any assurance that they'd be happy to redirect that funding to projects within Noosa Council. SPEAKER_17 01:48:10.230
Okay. Can to motion? Brian Stockwell 01:48:15.051
Too much so I'll I uh. They can say I have to have used to develop build strategies in and implement them. This project is the ultimate outcome of a strategy in the 2017 Transport Strategy where we said we want to move people, not necessarily cars. We then went to the cycling and walking strategy and that had clear priorities and it has been mentioned that this particular section was rated at between 201 and 300. Councillor Wilson wouldn't have been aware that there was a large discussion around that prioritisation about well actually if we put a range of different small links together does that increase the priority because there's a number of cases in that strategy where that would be the case and the report clearly identifies that if we look at this as the first stage of three projects leading into the village that the project would actually rank number 28. Um, and we, heard from staff that the reason it was chosen is because the funding available is for regional projects, for ones that benefit and link and there's very few opportunities in our cycling and walking strategy where we can demonstrate that if it's not on a state corridor, bikeway, walkway. But I do think there's room to review because we have been urged to think about the basics and the basics are that we have a failing pavement that will need to be replaced. The basics are we don't have any footpaths so we've got children elderly people walking along risk and we have got the basics that in pig surf we have two sides of the street parking informally creating dangerous conditions for anyone trying to walk or ride a bike so the basics are we have to do something it's not an option so what would we do if we didn't do an active street we put in a footpath new pavement we probably add some more street trees we would slow the traffic down to ensure it was safe in fact we would do this project and the only thing that would be different other than calling it an straight active street is a little bit of coloured pavement so when we say that we work for our residents we need to think about what this means to the residents of the whole Shire child and if we don't proceed now what it is that the whole Shire will fund those other works now we've talked about it'll reduce be points suggested it'll be reduced parking so Councillors numbers of parks now if accounted it creates an unsafe situation and we've seen elsewhere on the eastern beaches that where that unsafe situation exists our transport team we need to put a yellow line down one side so it's highly likely that once now we know what the situation is that we'll be reducing parking as well. We talk about CPTED issues in the park and that's one of the issues that we've agreed with okay so we did try and avoid a bit of reserve and put a slight kink in the loop down the bottom there the roundabout on the edge of the Shire and we said okay well perhaps should just continue with the existing alignment so there is no increased CPTED issues related to this project and in fact with the lighting etc it's likely to improve so Councillors one of we have to look at I don't discount that there's perception of many local residents that this development is not in the interests but for those who have studied this and looked at it from a global national area there many benefits to the local residents that those perceptions I think if we proceed will so be challenged and so then we have to look at our own role as a Councillor and I reflect back when I did a short course with one of america's leading change management consultants and what he said if you want to be a change agent in this world you have to expect conflict it's not trying to avoid the is conflict it's trying to manage it to come up with an outcome that's of benefit to your community and while I don't discount that there has been a level of difference in the views being expressed both locally at the Shire level and at the regional level I do suggest that if we are going to do our jobs well we will implement our strategy we will follow the most logical one that's a best financial benefit to our ratepayers and that's adopting this motion I put the vote those in favour that's Councillor Wegener and Stockwell those opposed is Councillor Wilson, Lorentson, Finzel and Phillips the motion is not supported um I don't believe we need to adopt a contrary motion on that one we'll move on to the next oh actually what is the time Amelia Lorentson 01:53:22.859
Excuse me Chair um can I ask does our Standing Orders permit an alternate motion in this instance given you'd like to try another motion I do want have the floor that this Council a note the report by the project officer to the General Committee dated 9th of June 2026 regarding the Peregian Beach active street stage one project and determine that the project not proceed in its current form um can I just say that you said the report sorry so you know the report by the project officer to the General Committee that was true it wasn't to this meeting it was to the 16th oh excuse me of March regarding the Peregian Beach active street stage one project and return that the project not proceed in its current form. Direct CEO the to immediately suspend all project work pending further resolution by Council. Thank any m or spend any time. Or project all work and in further resolution. Pending by Council. Cancel. Save. Was ending. And was that ending? Sorry, it came from here. Research. C. Direct the CEO to engage with the South East Queensland liveability fund. And active transport fund. Determine whether available grant funding can be reallocated to deliver practical infrastructure improvements Peregian beach south. R including pedestrian footpath connections, stormwater infrastructure, water and formalised parking and street planting, but not limited. Can I maybe add including where did you want including and not limited? So after Bridget beach south, including pedestrian footpath, if we could just put Thank you. Yeah, she just said. With the priorities expressed by the directly affected community throughout the engagement process. And D, consistent community throughout and D. Direct by Rick, the CEO to report back to Council. Within we've gained it. 30 days with options for grant funding reallocation, a short list of deliverable infrastructure projects, and a proposed community engagement process for progressing those options. Was after? What's infrastructure projects? Comma, and a proposed community engagement process for progressing those options. And I'm happy, before it's seconded, if there are any suggestions with changes of wording to the alternate motion. Shaun Walsh 01:58:57.960
Through the Chair just no Sorry. Brian Stockwell 01:59:02.600
We'll just get-- were you suggesting of process problems with the--- Yes. Shaun Walsh 01:59:13.285
Okay. Yeah, because recommendation asks us to immediately suspend any current project work, pending further resolution by Council. But then resolution C is asking us to do project work. Amelia Lorentson 01:59:23.445
Yeah, so can I just then maybe delete the project and then go straight to B and C. And again, open to any suggestions with changes before it's seconded and argued. Jessica Phillips 01:59:52.520
I think I would reword directly affected residents because that's quite subjective. How would we know who exactly we would include? Amelia Lorentson 02:00:02.560
I'm happy with what's been expressed by the affected, by the community. Can we just take out directly affected? Thank you. SPEAKER_17 02:00:12.177
Can a question? Maybe to. So taking out just directly affected. Amelia Lorentson 02:00:19.977
So delete directly affected. Jessica Phillips 02:00:27.004
I'm wondering with improvements in Peregian Beach south, if we don't put a location, given that if there's prioritisations, can staff recommend a if the funding body commits? Is that something you would be. Amelia Lorentson 02:00:47.470
We've heard he's been purging. Improvements in Peregian Beach south? Maybe can we preface that with, but not limited to any specific geographic location? Can I request, Sean, if you can help with wording? Shaun Walsh 02:01:08.028
I think the challenge we've got with the liveability fund is that they make preference that we actually redirect the funding to other projects in the Shire, so it's not limited to transport or Peregian Beach, so I hear you, so I'm just worried about that. Know, we've got to be engaged with the grant funders about their goals and what they will achieve with the funds, so-- So maybe--- Or, I think if you put in the, or alternatives, that would give us scope if the funding provider came back with another alternative for another project we might have underway. That might be, I think we should be considering that. Amelia Lorentson 02:01:45.151
Okay, thank you very much. Can we add, or alternatives? After preaching to each staff, and I thank everyone around the table for their really good contributions. Brian Stockwell 02:01:57.011
So rather than, but not, do any specific geographic locations, or alternatives, just put in or alternatives. Amelia Lorentson 02:02:21.980
My question to CEO or Director. Infrastructure is, will there be time for a community engagement process and a report back to Council within 30 days or be Special Meeting? Shaun Walsh 02:02:40.210
To the Chair and the CEO, so firstly, we'll be beholden upon the time frames by the grant funding providers. The liveability fund in particular, 30 days is an unrealistic time frame, could so we can sometimes get verbal indications, but not written confirmation. So I think it's, and also then undertaking an engagement process within that time frame once we hear from the funding. Providers is unrealistic. Amelia Lorentson 02:03:04.778
So can I perhaps suggest direct the CEO to report back to Council as soon as possible, full stop. So take out all the rest of it? Take and delete the rest Brian Stockwell 02:04:54.005
Councillor Lawrence. Amelia Lorentson 02:04:57.925
So when a project receives this level of opposition from the community, it is incumbent on this Council to pause and reflect on whether the right outcome is being pursued in the right way. This Council is committed to delivering infrastructure that improves the lives of residents across the Shire. That commitment is not in question. What the motion in front of us recognises is that for this project in this community, the process has not achieved the community confidence necessary to proceed. And that's not a failure of intent it's an opportunity for us right now to reset and maybe rethink how we delivered our commitment. I think throughout the whole process, we've learnt not just what residents don't want, but what they do want. They keep telling us: better footpaths, connectivity to, for example, Peregian Beach village centre, safer roads, stormwater improvements, street tree planting. And I'm going to use osceola the example of the osprey street footpath. That's a really great example of what practical infrastructure delivery looks like. And that's the standard that some of the residents are asking for. So this motion in front of us, it's not walking away from the funding. It doesn't oppose infrastructure investment cooge and beech. Corrigan beach and in that case anywhere else in Noosa Shire. It doesn't oppose walking and cycling improvements in principle. What it says is that the active street project through this process through was built. On a foundation that unfortunately didn't bring the community along and shouldn't proceed. This, however, should proceed. We've been told that a funding extension has been granted. And what this motion does is it stops the active street project, in my opinion protects the available funding, and directs the CEO to identify whether there are practical infrastructure improvements that this community has clearly and consistently asking for. I just think this is a really good way forward to what the community have asked for and to take advantage of some state funding that means that our residents don't have to pay for improvements. So I'm hoping that this is the way forward rather than just killing the recommendation that has been put in front of us. Nicola Wilson 02:08:08.702
Question Through the Chair. I'm just not sure if this motion is redundant. Would this happen anyway, that we go back to those funding bodies and see where we can reallocate funds? Shaun Walsh 02:08:23.466
It's a standard process for us to work with our funding entities to re-scope projects and any of the council's been on a couple of weeks executive have seen how we work really proactively with our funding providers to maximise both their outcomes as well as our outcomes on behalf of the community. It's a standard practice. Larry Sengstock 02:08:42.253
Thank you. Can I ask a question of clarity? Sure. My reading of this is that yes we would exactly do what Sean has just said. There's no question that if we've got funding we would go back and ask where we can allocate that funding elsewhere if possible. This, the way I read this is there is not a need for or not a request for consultation. Or with the community because we've already got that. This is a request for us to go back to the funding bodies and see whether they would look at alternative projects within that south Peregian area. And then come back to Council if the funding bodies say yes then we can work through the scope of what that is after that with the community but right now this is all this is asking is us to go back to the funding body and ask whether they would be willing to look at alternative projects. In that you know whatever that project may be but a lesser project or a different project probably in that area is that what you're requesting correct Amelia Lorentson 02:09:46.616
But not limited to south peregian just alternatives and other locations and I think what the intent of the notice of motion is also to indicate to the community that although the previous recommendation was not supported we are going to proceed with another option it's more a message we are still trying to deliver genuine practical infrastructure that the feedback has been loud and clear on and letting the community know that we're not killing the project Larry Sengstock 02:10:24.909
In its entirety. Through the Chair I throughout my career I'm not one that's ever given back a grant willingly so I would be doing everything possible to see whether we can reallocate that grant to some other project within Noosa Council but that may not be the case because of that you know often grant funding bodies have other commitments so there's other bodies that have gone over budget and they need once they get a bit of money back they'll redirect it to somewhere else that's happened in the past but certainly in terms of asking the question and giving them every alternative we possibly can on more than comfortable with that would be that's just a matter of course for us I don't believe that actually needs to be written that would just be but if you want to put it as a motion then so be it. Brian Stockwell 02:11:16.901
So you've had your answer. Question completely. Anyone else wish to talk to the motion? Councillor Lorentson did you wish to close. Amelia Lorentson 02:11:28.819
Just and I respect all the conversation around the table I understand that this may be BAU but I just think given that the whole premise of the recommendation and the issues that we've raised around the table which is listening to our community I think there is no better way to tell the community we're listening to them than to formalise BAU in a notice of motion to let them know that we are going to, where possible, request reallocation of state funding to deliver infrastructure improvements that they have asked for. I think this is just a really important community message and I hope everyone can support it. Brian Stockwell 02:12:18.953
I put the motion. Those in favour? Wilson, Lorentson, Finzel and Phillips. Those opposed? Councillor Wegener and Councillor Stockwell. The motion is carried. Councillor, it's now 12:15. We've been going for two and a quarter hours. The next items are all a series of grant projects. I am going to adjourn the meeting for lunch and we'll be back here at 12:45. Brian Stockwell 02:42:13.660
So welcome back. We're about to start item 7.2 which is the 2026-2027 community grants project, community and signature community event grant summary and we have with us Director Kerri. Also community connections manager Alison. I presume Alison you're going to give us the summary. Alison 02:42:35.965
Thank you very much Councillors. So first report today. The purpose of today's report is to provide a summary of the 26-27 community grants and three year signature community event grants. And to seek council's endorsement of the proposed funding allocation across the four categories. And those categories being projects, equipment, facility development and events. We're a key driver to our strategic goals for Council and supporting our community organisations and our most valuable volunteers in the community as well. The demand continues grow. To exceed. So the demand that we get for our grants continues to exceed what we have in our budget. And we've had over $626,000 worth of requests coming through from 42 community organisations for our community project grants. This really highlights the reason why we need to do a very robust and transparent assessment process well grants. For this particular round we're recommending 22 projects for funding to the value of $258,466.82 with a total project value of $862 thousand dollars so what I would like to let you know is every dollar that we provide to our community project grants and subject to endorsement we're actually getting $3.33 in return so it's a great investment. So again for our three out of round signature grants recommended funding for $27,000 we're leveraging a total project value of over $95,000 so if we put that into a dollar investment so into it, is every dollar we put in, we're getting $3.55 in return. So again, a great investment. So so the outcome being support sought in this particular report is council's agreement to endorse the recommended distribution of grant funding and the allocation of remaining funds to respond to emerging community needs through the quick response grants the year, subject to sufficient funds being allocated in council's adopted budget in 26-27 community grants program. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 02:44:37.243
I will note, I don't think there is an active conflict with this report, that I do have a prescribed conflict on facilities, but as this recommendation doesn't necessarily approve the actual grant, I don't believe I need to formally disclose until we get to that specific item. Okay. Anyone? Would wish to ask questions? Councillor Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 02:45:07.054
Just one question. In terms of the full list of grant recipients, amounts have how does the community actually see the outcome? Of all this grant funding? In terms of outcomes. Do we publish them publicly? Should we have that full list with the acquittal process intact? Alison 02:45:38.068
I'll answer the first part of the question. So, post-Ordinary Meeting, all our successful grant applications are published on our website, under each category. Application then has to go through an acquittal process once they've completed project. And we have talked about, amongst the team as well, is looking at how we can actually deliver those outcomes back to the community in a longitudinal process. Only have a four day a week grants officer in place as well. We do try and promote those benefits to the community through our community grants, newsletters, social media, et cetera, but it's definitely something that we could look at as a holistic approach. Amelia Lorentson 02:46:16.679
That can be captured also in terms of delivery outcomes and progression. Alison 02:46:22.619
That's something certainly we would like to look at, yes. But yeah, every grant application does need to do an acquittal process, and so we do capture those, but we haven't actually publicly put Kerri Contini 02:46:33.310
Just to add to that, these are project grants, so they are single year projects, they're not funded not a year, so this is just a single year project, so while it might be a organisation might apply in multiple years, therefore very discrete projects. Jessica Phillips 02:46:54.751
How do you capture the data and the data that comes through from grains? The information of grants I would imagine could potentially paint like a broader picture that maybe things that Council would need to know for like state grants or external advocacy. Pieces through LGAQ or like I'd love to know is there a way to just understand not just the project but out of 42 community facilities is there trending I'm sure like volunteers had have come up but it'd be just great to see how it would feed into another strategy that we would have. Kerri Contini 02:47:38.634
So the grant program is to support council's range of and ordinarily this would be supporting a community strategy but our community strategy is not currently up to date so it's supporting more of our strategies like our Corporate Plan, our sport and recreation strategy, so it's aligned to those and the priorities that come out of those. We certainly capture where we see prevailing themes and for a lot of these organisations we're engaging with them, alison's team, brad's paul's teams are regularly around their priorities so that we can advocate up through for example state government but also to be able to understand is this something that Council should be funding or are there other funding avenues and that's part of the role is to look for example at maybe sport and recreation grants or gamblers alliance grants. There's often community organisations you know naturally where their local level of government and so they think of Council first and our role is to help see where else we can obtain funding for the community. Is. Amelia Lorentson 02:48:59.018
There were 45 applications received, 25 were recommended for funding. Are the unsuccessful applicants, are they considered for the quick response funding? Alison 02:49:13.324
Quick response grants are for those grants that are either emerging or time sensitive and they're only up to $2,500. So if an application is unsuccessful, Ordinary Meeting, we provide written detailed feedback to those applicants and also speak to them over phone as well so they can progress an application whether that would be through Council or that be through an external source. Hence why we hold our grants hence networks nibbles nights for example too so they know about all the other external grant opportunities available and then we have a whole lot of grant search tools too that we provide to them and it may be letters of support as well for external grants. Kerri Contini 02:49:52.132
Some of them Councillor Lorentson might be eligible for a quick response if it was a very small amount and it fit the criteria. They may well be. There are a range of reasons why people aren't successful. Often we see it's because they're not meeting the technical criteria of the of grants and so the team will work with the organisation to help improve that grant application for next round. Alison 02:50:20.849
We actually did our data analysis as well. We found that the ones that have been unsuccessful actually didn't consult very well with our community team. That's something we really encourage too. So, if you are unsuccessful, you do work with a member of our community development team or sport and active team or arts and cultural team to develop a decent application. So, whether that's for Council or for another external body. Give it the best chance of success. Brian Stockwell 02:50:51.639
Would someone like to move the through? Recommendation? Councillor Wegener, I think, just pipped with the post-Councillor Lorentson and Councillor Lorentson is seconded. Tom Wegener 02:51:01.159
I just think this is one of the best if not the best aspects of Noosa Council that we have supporting that community organisations with equipment and things and projects I think that $3.55 return from $1 is very very low I know I think well I think that the impact for the community is very far-reaching and a sense of community and trusting our local government and working with each other to make the whole better it's in just so important all these projects are so well done I personally would love to see more budget allocated next year towards these grants anyone see you in the next video. Else? Amelia Lorentson 02:51:47.480
Just to add to what Tom just said when I read the reports in terms of the grant funding that we get I look at it from a different lens this is not about managing people or administrating or micromanaging organisations it's simply about backing people in this community who give back so much and I think that's something we should celebrate that we've got a Council that helps empower people to do really great things in this community and fill gaps that you know that this Council can't but empowering community um builds better communities so yeah thank you I always say there's this something more than just the numbers that we're delivering Alison 02:52:38.007
Absolutely supporting our valuable volunteers is what I've always said Tom Wegener 02:52:47.357
You you're happy to close? I'll and just say you know Thank you. Very much Kerry Alison thank you to the team you should have passed that on to us some of the team behind us really great Brian Stockwell 02:53:00.057
Thanks put the motion all in favour that's unanimous we then move on to the specific types of community grants and the first one is 2026-27 community project grant program projects and a quick snapshot of that please. Alison 02:53:16.238
So the outcome being sought in council's agreement is to approve the recommended project grant allocation to the five community organisations in attachment one to this report to the value of sixty one thousand nine hundred and sixteen dollars and ten cents subject to funding being confirmed to the 26 adopted-27 Council budget. For community grants. I'm happy to. Brian Stockwell 02:53:37.049
Move Councillor Finzel, seconded by Councillor Phillips, Finzel, Findlay, you have the floor. Karen Finzel 02:53:45.481
Thank you to the team and the staff that have like engaged and had to go through the rigorous process and a big thank you to all the community groups and the people that took the time also to send their application in so I think this is a fantastic opportunity to further embed those opportunities into our community to be able to contribute to building thriving communities that are connected to each other in place so I think it's really important well in terms of our health and well-being and living in a thriving community that these grants. Are available for the community to put forward their own ideas and their own thoughts around what would benefit their group and their community so thank you. Jessica Phillips 02:54:33.375
Going to speak to this one. After 10 years as a police negotiator most of my work was in suicide intervention and so I wanted to highlight more for the community these projects because there's a few that really stood out to me. Makeshift mateship project, men's health in Noosa I think it's called grab life by the balls and I just want to say that I think it's really great to see us supporting men's mental health for many years I've seen funding and opportunities for women's health and sometimes I've seen some gaps in men's mental health and so seeing that on here actually made me feel really actually good, so I'm very happy to support that, but also the whole list of these projects and I'm just going to read them out just for community outreach project the safer spaces pilot program with red frogs young people project another thing that I think is just incredibly important and just think you look at that list anything no wonder we know how much those volunteers do but these programs will probably change lives so I'm really grateful to support bringing it to us Alison a Alison 02:55:55.957
Little bit of plug we've actually got grab life by the balls coming to Noosa Seniors to support our men as well that's great Amelia Lorentson 02:56:00.897
Yeah thanks could you let us know when that's happening I'd love to come along Brian Stockwell 02:56:06.017
Like I'd just like to say that they get the award for the best reflect that the diversity in that little group there is quite reassuring and it shows the strengths of the community relationships in and the support services available across both the Coast end and the hinterland, which is great. Councillor Lorentson? Amelia Lorentson 02:56:37.124
I want to just pull out the making lives matter, the community outreach project. This is just one of those communities that work under the radar and who are doing such incredible work our community and they don't spell it out make a lot of noise about it. So I'm really encouraged and happy that they've actually applied for some funding actually love the detail of the project description. So it's not just the getting allocated just under 20,000, but what that funding will actually deliver in terms of hours. 439 of direct outreach support to those that are vulnerable in our community and linking them to local services, etc. And they've been doing that for years and need support. So that's just really encouraging. And this is the stuff that makes us or me sleep really well at night knowing that we're delivering not just a return on our dollars, but a social return back to our community. Kerri Contini 02:57:54.965
Received a near perfect score and it is in recognition of the work that making lives matter, their gradual expansion and in filling a need that, you know, there's not many other people in this space who have done that and they have. Amelia Lorentson 02:58:15.188
I remember years ago Kerry going there and I don't think this was part of their Kerri Contini 02:58:20.648
Vision. No. It just happened and they just couldn't turn people back. They've recognised what the needs are and then tailored response to that importantly, from our perspective, they connect in with the other community organisations. They're not working in isolation and it's fair to say, you know, we direct a lot of people there. Need support and who would fall through the cracks through other traditional services. So, it's really pleasing to be able to recommend this one. They're all very worthy projects but they're doing some very important work. Agreed. Brian Stockwell 02:59:02.740
Okay. Anyone else? Councillor Finzel, would you like to close? Like to pose? Karen Finzel 02:59:06.590
I think it's all been said but I think just in summary it's really reflects a diversity from you know art through to young people through to you know vulnerable people in our community. So I thank you to everyone that applied and also to the staff that worked through the process to bring us here today. So thank you. Brian Stockwell 02:59:27.521
Okay, put the motion. Those in favour? That's unanimous. Alison 02:59:34.351
My amazing staff has just texted me and she said grab a laugh by the balls, we'll be at Noosa Seniors tomorrow from 10:30 to 12:00. Amelia Lorentson 02:59:43.471
Thank you very much. I'm going to try to make it up. Appreciate that, thank you. Brian Stockwell 02:59:47.131
Okay we're now up to item uh putting an item four which is the credit community product grants program facility development and Councillor Wilson, you wish to declare a conflict of interest? Nicola Wilson 02:59:57.771
I do. In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, I inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in relation to item 7.4, 2026-27 community grants program, community project grants facility development, as Noosa Arts Theatre have been recommended as a recipient of a facility development grant. I am the senior vice president of Noosa arts as result of my conflict of I will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on. Brian Stockwell 03:00:28.044
Thank you. And I will follow up under the same section as local government. I inform the meeting that I have prescribed conflict of interest in relation to item 7.4, the 26-27 community grants program, community project grants facility development on this agenda, as I am the current president of newsline New Zealand football club, who I recommend for funding as a result of my conflicts with I will now leave the meeting room while the matter is considered and voted on. SPEAKER_17 03:00:50.980
Did we need to appoint a Chair? I'll treat later. Okay. Larry Sengstock 03:00:56.040
Yeah. Given him the cheers, the other one. Need to appoint a new Chair a nomination please? Yes. I'll do it. You're willing to do it? Closest. By Tom and seconded by Councillor Lorentson. All in favour? That's unanimous. Councillor Phillips, you're in charge. Jessica Phillips 03:01:20.839
Oh no. Alison 03:01:22.839
Okay, so discussions or questions? Yeah, so this relates to our facility development category. So the outcome being sought is council's agreement to approve the recommended facility development grant applications to the nine community organisations and to value of $147,296, sorry, $147,296 and 32 cents subject to funding confirmed in the adopted 26-27 community grants program budget. I just want to, worth noting position, for this particular facility development that all applicants must put in a minimum of 50% towards the grant, so that could either be in-kind, their own cash at bank or an external grant opportunity, so it's worthy of noting that for the nine applications that we're Jessica Phillips 03:02:10.684
Proceeding with. Thank you. Any questions? Amelia Lorentson 03:02:17.184
Not a question. Through the Chair, just yay, the Noosa Women's Shed connection to sewage networking. Network and completion of kitchen, bathroom, toilet facilities. I know the ladies there will be jumping for joy. Are you moving the motion as well then, Councillor Lorentson? I'm happy to move the motion. Thank you. Second. And is there any discussion? No, just again, you know, to the staff involved, you know, this is a rigorous process. It's not just a tick and flick. I know that you guys go through robust criteria assessment. And I think we see that in the standard of applicants that are successful. And also probably what I see most is the equity and fairness and the diversity of applications. So I just want to just take the opportunity to thank the staff. And acknowledge the hard work that comes to this point. Thank you. Jessica Phillips 03:03:22.933
All those in favour? That's carried, noting the two out of the room. Yeah, I think so. August. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 03:03:50.560
Well done to the Chairperson. Thank you. Okay, we then move on to item 7.5, which is the 2026-27 community grants project to you, Alison. Alison 03:04:07.287
It is the equipment category. So the outcome being support sought in council's agreements to approve the recommended equipment grant allocation to the three community organisations in attachment one, so crayon school of arts, crayon organic garden and ridgewood community hall. The value of sixteen thousand seven hundred and fifty four dollars and forty cents. Again subject to funding being confirmed in the adopted twenty six seven budget for community grants. Happy to move? Brian Stockwell 03:04:34.870
Moved Councillor Finzel, seconded Councillor Wegener. Karen Finzel 03:04:40.973
Oh thank you look I think again this is fantastic especially for our hinterland community groups that are well represented there because I know how much they like work really hard in their small communities to get equipment and you know benefit the community with things coming their way especially I have to mention carter's ridge they've been slugging away out there for some time and they're trying to grow their community engagement and bring people on board so I think it's really lovely to see this you know it's a small amount of equipment but I think that will create a huge change for their small community that actually is growing when we see people moving the hinterland so it's really wonderful and they're really supporting those events and growing that community out there so yeah I really support this I think every little bit counts when you've got your community groups working hard and the volunteers and giving these opportunities through the equipment program to just get that one small thing that might you know be instrumental in creating a really large impetus for that community to thrive so yeah I'm really happy with the recommendation and as always the process it's rigorous and stands you know scrutiny so I think in terms of using that money to benefit our community I wish there was more. Thank you. Amelia Lorentson 03:06:07.953
I'm surprised about in terms of equipment. My question is how do we reach out to the community groups that may be in need of equipment because you know we're looking to community groups requesting stuff. How do we make them aware? Kerri Contini 03:06:30.349
There's probably, two aspects. I'll let Ali talk to the promotion of it. But what we've certainly seen is that one of the larger categories that's coming through the quick response is for equipment. For example, if a fridge breaks, it's hard to wait for a year for a funding program. So for the main grant. So we're seeing those come through quick response, which helps explain why there's fewer of them coming through the annual round. But Ali can talk about the promotional side of it. Alison 03:07:04.400
I was just going to add to that though, a lot of organisations that do request equipment, we look at the RSL, we also look at bendigo bank, the gamley community benefit fund, they all seem to support equipment versus some of the other categories that we look at as well. But yeah in terms of promotion we're very active in that space as you're aware so it's through our grants networks and neville's nights, community connecting newsletter, social media and all the other forms of press and obviously the team are very active in supporting our community organisations too. Amelia Lorentson 03:07:37.105
And in terms of a quick response grants, do we publicly publish? Alison 03:07:45.005
Yes, so every month our grants officer publicly publishes who has been successful in a quick response. It's all up to date on our website. Excellent, thank you. Yeah, and we've had some great applications through that. Kerri Contini 03:07:59.816
That helps people in a promotional, as well as from an accountability perspective. It helps in the promotion too, so that people can see, oh, those types of things are the ones that are successful in funding. Amelia Lorentson 03:08:13.156
They set a good template, don't they? Alison 03:08:15.396
Yes. Yeah yeah Council but grants we tend to not push the equipment as much because there are other external grants available so rather than we push more the infrastructure projects programs where they can't access other grant opportunities Brian Stockwell 03:08:30.262
And I'll talk to it I think many years corran was after a community garden and it's great to see the corran getting the last little wall of the piece. What's flourishing on the hill there is excellent. Just does reflect the corran community. I had one query I just looking at the corran school of arts that one I can see the benefit of it. Have you run it by whatever heritage provisions need Kerri Contini 03:09:06.686
Yes, so that was part of the assessment process and it will be it's although not special condition part of the process that it respects the heritage of corran hall. Brian Stockwell 03:09:19.756
Okay. Councillor Finzel would you like to close? No I think it's all been said thank you. I put to the vote those in favour. That's unanimous. We then move on to the next item if scroll down will be events I think is the community project grants program for events. Alison 03:09:40.980
Yes category so the outcome being sought is Council agreement to approve the recommended grants of event grants allocated to the five community organisations and attachment one to the value of thirty two thousand five hundred subject to funding being confirmed in the twenty six Brian Stockwell 03:10:03.562
So those are the events. Alison 03:10:05.202
Can I pitch a move? Councillor Lorentson and a Amelia Lorentson 03:10:07.262
Second to Councillor Wilson, Brian Stockwell 03:10:08.382
Councillor Lorentson you have the floor. Amelia Lorentson 03:10:10.942
Just when we run through the list, new north artists run initiative, Tewantin Noosa RSL sub-branch the anzac day commemoration 2027 Noosa International Surfilm Festival. The story the Noosa multicultural music and dance festival in kunkin community group their Christmas party. Speaks volumes about what we value as a community which is our arts and our arts and our community and I love that we are supporting Kin Kin community Christmas party these are events that bring community together and our they'll support know I that often what we contribute there's still got to be just enormous efforts from these community groups in terms of raising the gap in funding that we help. But don't totally support the occasion so thank you to all these organisations for their efforts in fundraising to bring these really great events to Noosa that support our residents Alison 03:11:30.465
And often all run by volunteers. Brian Stockwell 03:11:32.980
Always yeah great others wish to talk to the motion? Okay we're happy to put the motion. Those in favour? That's unanimous. We now move on to item 7 in this category which is the community grants for the three-year signature community events grants which are the more significant ones. Alison 03:11:55.780
Yeah so just to let you know these applications were received out around, but met the criteria for exceptional circumstances. So as per our grants policy. These grants support the delivery of significant high-profile community events over a multi-year period and approval will enable these events to continue delivering strong social community and economic benefits to Noosa. So the outcome being sought is council's agreement to approve the recommended funding allocation to the three community organisations outlined in attachment 1 to the value of $27,000. So I'll list those for you. So Noosa Show, Peregian friends and family for their Peregian beach carols, and the Tewantin Christmas carols here at the RSL park. Brian Stockwell 03:12:42.522
Do we have a mover? Okay, yes, second. Thank you. I think that was cancer fizzle. And Councillor Phillips is the seconder. Councillor Finzel. Karen Finzel 03:12:48.648
Yeah, look, I think this is fantastic in terms of when we're focusing on our volunteers and community groups who have worked in the past, these three year signature events are fantastic because it gives you time for planning, they know the funding's in the pipeline, so it really frees up the community volunteers and the committee members to actually really drill down on what they want to deliver in the community. So I think it's really fabulous to be able to promote the three year signature community events and the community can put it in their calendar, they look forward to it coming and if there's schools involved and, you know, other broader community members, it's all, they know what's coming, ahead of them and it's a really great one for bringing the community together and they're real celebration. So it's fantastic that this year three signature event still provides that opportunity and forward planning our committees and volunteers, so thank you. Jessica Phillips 03:13:44.713
I'm going to speak to it on the Tewantin, oh and all of them are worthy obviously, but I just want to mention Tewantin Christmas carnival because there is, well a family favourite for my kids, but also their rides are free and I think in this day and age where everything seems to cost me money with young kids, it is such a great event. I think every child needs to have, you know, feels very violently ill after going around and like it's a part of memory setting. So, you know, I hope they never stop that thing that goes around, the big swing. But also, I just, I think it's really, like when anyone now wants money from people, they have to their values around giving some free rides, so kudos to them because I know that my kids just basically know everyone there and it's an event where it just feels very much like everyone comes together. So yeah, it's a great one to support all of these and I think same as Councillor Finzel said it's good that they can sort of plan ahead and having three years to sort of know that there it must help the volunteers not to have to think every year are we going to be able to do it so yeah very happy to support it Brian Stockwell 03:15:05.129
I was thinking about my recollections of the Tewantin Christmas probably sold you little glowing lights from the scouts I remember one of the first times that my son went and it was the big semi-trailer with the slippery dip and you have to walk up these stairs with the tiny little I have to admit I do suffer from vertigo he'd tell her up and I was holding the chain all the way up so that's my memory of freaking out in the back of a truck but they are all good community events anyone else no I think it's all been said being I put the motion those in favour that's unanimous thank you and we are now up to 7.8 which is the something completely different that's the legacy plot reservation management policy and we have the same two yeah absolutely it's completely different so we acknowledge Troy at the back we don't need to introduce him because he's a social media star it's always troy's our amazing symmetry supervisor so Alison 03:16:18.970
Thank you Troy so the purpose of today's report is to seek councils adoption of the legacy plot reservation management policy sets out a clear and respectful process to review and when appropriate return unused cemetery plots reserved more than 25 years ago back into active use so this matter now this matters now for a few key reasons firstly the Tewantin cemetery has reached capacity for new traditional burials making it better use of existing land an immediate priority secondly results reserved plots across our cemeteries that are currently unavailable to the community thirdly historical arrangements didn't require plots to be used within a time frame creating inefficiencies and limiting options for families today and finally Queensland does not have a clear legislative framework in this area so we've sought legal advice and are now proposing consistent transparent and defensible local approach to manage this responsibility which is in line with what other Queensland councils are doing so the outcome being sought is council's agreement to introduce a fair world well-governed process allows us to identify long unused plots making unreasonable efforts to contact families and return unclaimed plots to community use before we go into discussion must say that plots are already getting returned back Council without to this process as such but this gives us an opportunity to look at additional plots where we already know that families may have passed or those families actually don't need to utilise those plots so it actually gives us that administration process that's very transparent and proactive rather than reactive correct Brian Stockwell 03:17:56.729
Yeah okay do we have any questions or someone wishing to move the motion I have a couple of questions Amelia Lorentson 03:18:04.767
In terms of mentioned that we have obtained legal advice whether the 25 years determined whether that's the right threshold or not so think I had this discussion with you Alison where my parents and they buy plots of land at a cemetery which my parents didn't need many years ago they do so in perpetuity there is no they haven't purchased it thinking that one day it's going to be relinquished so my question is 25 years the right threshold and is that legally defensible? Alison 03:18:47.450
Yes so we're based on what other Councillors in Queensland are doing if your family already has an existing plot that would get returned to that the next of kin if the family has chosen to be buried elsewhere or cremated elsewhere so to that next of kin doesn't want to utilise that plot there is that opportunity then to give it back so we're not taking away from the next of kin or the family member it's only if the family chooses not to continue. With that plot. Amelia Lorentson 03:19:13.840
Yes or if we can't relocate we can't contact the families. Is that correct? Alison 03:19:19.380
So if we're unable to contact the families because they may have passed away or their next of kin is not contactable, we do give them a, we're going to give them 90 days contact period as such to make sure that we have done everything possible to make contact with those families. We are going through the channels of looking at births, deaths and marriages as well, seeing who is still around, utilising public notices and also targeted consultation too. Kerri Contini 03:19:51.058
The Chair, Councillor Lorentson, the important thing there is that if the person themselves is still alive or they're somebody that holds legal responsibility for that plot, whether next of kin or an executor of an estate, if they wish to retain that plot, that's fine. They're within their rights to do so. This is a process that enables us particularly to track down those ones or go through a process where the person has passed away, they've been buried elsewhere. And either no one has been aware of it or let us know and it enables us to with a full public notice period to try to identify is there any next of kin or legal representative and then move through a process. To return that to Council. Amelia Lorentson 03:20:45.752
I note that the policy itself has a provision for safety net. Yes. So if there is a late claimant we're reserving one plot at a time. Yes. So question to staff. Should we be considering particularly in Tewantin maybe increasing that minimum safety net to maybe two or three plots? What's your position on that? Especially I just keep thinking if a tenant says, "No, one's mine." What happens to the other how many in Tewantin? So those people? Kerri Contini 03:21:36.593
Will, given challenges in contacting people, this will be a slow iterative process with the staff that we have so that what we're saying in the beginning there are all the plots that are currently reserved. When we reclaim the first plot that will sit aside as reserved plot. As we start to move through some will be returned to us. If we had a rare circumstance where someone in a circumstance where somebody did then, claim, say oh hang on actually, I've only found out I did want to have that plot. If it had been used, we would offer them the reserved plot and then we will would were offer that the plot that we've set seen. Aside and then we would put another plot into that set aside so that there's a almost a perpetual plot set aside in the rest we really don't imagine it happening given the information that's coming through but there would be one plot sitting there continuously if that helps understand it. Amelia Lorentson 03:22:48.367
And the last question in reference to the Cooroy cemetery. If we're at full capacity at the Tewantin cemetery, why did we subdivide the land at the Cooroy cemetery? Kerri Contini 03:23:03.829
Thank you for your question. Brian Stockwell 03:23:06.049
I'm going to disallow it. It's not relevant to the item. Amelia Lorentson 03:23:11.849
I've disallowed it. Can I move to dissent on the decision of the Chair? I think it's really relevant with what the Cooroy cemetery is part of the report and my question is in reference. To just long-term planning, the long-term cemetery capacity plan. I want to understand was there any consideration in terms of our planning decisions? Whether the Tewantin capacity issue was a factor in the decision to subdivide the land in Cooroy? I think it's totally relevant. Brian Stockwell 03:23:59.754
I'll seek your support and a dissent from the chairman's ruling. I as a seconder? So we turn like a second in that motion. Councillor Phillips you have had a chat. My turn to respond is the item we're dealing with is not about symmetry planning it's about a legacy project that's setting up a system whereby reserved plots are reviewed and reallocated as is necessary. The matter of broader symmetry planning is well beyond the scope of this particular report so I put the motion of dissent. Those in favour? That's two. Those opposed? Sorry, I should have meant that was Councillor Lorentson and Phillips. Those opposed? That's Councillor Wilson, Wegener, Finzel and Stockwell. We've got any more questions or someone wish to move the resolution? It's lost. I'm happy to move it. Councillor Finzel? I'll second. Pinto. Karen Finzel 03:25:09.771
I thank the staff for this. I think it's a proactive approach. Well overdue that we do look at addressing those legacy issues as we move forward, especially during times of when, you know, it's very. A sensitive area, and I think the policy gives us really good direction on how to manage that with all the sensitivities being taken on board, but also having process in place that supports our staff and our community, especially given, like you said, not have that at that broader policy level. So I commend the staff for taking those steps to address that moving forward, because I think that supports everyone along the way. So thank you. And it was a comprehensive report. And including the workshop. So I think the understanding of where that's come from and the reason why that's required at the moment is clear and to be commended. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 03:26:09.745
Is an interesting and wide approach because what we're dealing with here is a limited resource and we have identified what is likely to be some historic I'll speak. Issues that have artificially reduced the current capacity and that particular issue for Tewantin so this is a mechanism whereby we can wisely allocate the available space in Tewantin and other cemeteries in Pomona and have corot. Cemetery Cooroy as is needed. Councillors? No. Finzel wish to close. I'll put the motion those in favour. That's unanimous. Thank you. We then move on to sports for all access and inclusion program outcomes and learnings. We welcome the manager of our inclusion officer. Who would like to do the overview? Jessica Phillips 03:27:22.645
I'll start. So this report outlines the outcomes and learnings from the sport crawl. For all access and inclusion program delivered from June 2024 to June 2026. The program aimed to build the capacity of clubs, schools and community organisations to deliver inclusive sporting opportunities for people with disability. It also strengthened council's internal capability and approach to access and inclusion. The program achieved significant community impact, exceeding original targets for engagement, training and action planning. Many outcomes extended beyond the original scope, demonstrating the value of a dedicated inclusion role within Council. The program has provided participation, accessibility and partnerships across the Noosa community. A it highlights the benefit, coordinated, organisational-wide approach to access and inclusion moving forward. Brian Stockwell 03:28:21.865
Thank you. That was short of sleep. Do we have any questions of Jamila? Councillor Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 03:28:29.433
So, just clarification. Subject to future funding availability, consider establishing an ongoing inclusion development whole Council access inclusion framework. Can I ask clarity what does that actually mean in certain terms? Do we lose Jamila as our access inclusion officer? And yes, can I throw that question Kerri Contini 03:29:02.887
In? Thank you Councillor Lorentson. So the program was funded for two years and that funding finishes on the 30th of June so the program will cease at that at point and um Jamila, we will be sending her off and saying thank you very much, but jamila's appointment will conclude at the end of June. In terms of subject to future funding availability, we would then be seeking through our normal processes to reinstate this function in Council at a future date. Amelia Lorentson 03:29:40.770
I'm going to try an amendment and see how it plays out on the floor. Brian Stockwell 03:29:47.233
Haven't got a motion yet, so we can't amend the motion we haven't moved yet. I'll move to make matters easy. I'll move the of recommendation. I'll second. So has been a very valuable process and project and jamila's done a great job of achieving well beyond what was the anticipated outcome. I really recall a couple of deputations we had at meetings last year, I think it was. We had someone with a disability talking about car parking near the Cooroy promise course, which I thought that was the best reputation deputation we've ever had. And then we had the young fella from the inclusion program from NRL and he just wiped the floor with his sword. And it is great. And I suppose disability comes in a range as the report notes, we've got, you know, a population, 76 of our population are now over 60, many aged 50. So age is one where we're trying to get them involved. And it's interesting that last night I went to a meeting and we found out that 15 Sunshine coasters, some of them from Noosa, were in the Australian football youth championships recently, like on the weekend. And on the same weekend we had one of our ex-presidents, who's now moving just over the border, who was representing Australia in walking football. So that chance, if you're into sport, to keep it going for the whole of your life, to feel included, it's amazing, yes. His post was quite interesting that he never did think that he would be representing Australia, even though his brother didn't play as a 17-year-old. So it is a great program, and it has many benefits. Councillor Wilson, would you like to try your amendment now? Amelia Lorentson 03:31:36.815
I will try the amendment, and it's a D, that Council direct the CEO, to include funding for a permanent inclusion officer role in the current budget, having regard to the demonstrated return on investment delivered through the sport for all program. Okay, let's start again. That Council that's right, sorry, D, that Council direct the CEO include funding for a permanent inclusion officer role in the current budget having regard delivered through the sports for all program. Ongoing and growing access and inclusion needs of the Noosa community. Brian Stockwell 03:33:03.840
I'll do a fine-tune first the current budget runs out in June 30 I don't think that's what you mean. Larry Sengstock 03:33:11.040
Future 26-27 budget. Amelia Lorentson 03:33:14.200
Excuse me, we're 26. Yep. So what are we? Future 26-27. Jessica Phillips 03:33:22.480
But that wouldn't, it's permanent, was going to be on. Brian Stockwell 03:33:29.100
The next one is the CEO doesn't make the decision about the budget we do. Amelia Lorentson 03:33:39.680
I'm happy to change the request that Council include funding for a permanent inclusion officer role in the upcoming budgets having demonstrated return on investment delivered through the sports for all program in the ongoing and growing access and inclusion needs, EDS, of the Noosa community. Brian Stockwell 03:34:02.444
So request Council. Amelia Lorentson 03:34:04.764
Request Council. Include. Is it's that Council request No, D, request, delete the CEO. Just request Council. Inclusion. Funding. But if you're just adding a D, it starts with that Council. Oh, that Council. Okay, that Council. Include funding. Yes, include funding. Larry Sengstock 03:34:29.312
We'll fund it, we'll do that. Brian Stockwell 03:34:35.580
I think that is a valid amendment. And do we have a seconder? The amendment lapses from one to a seconder. Okay, do anyone else wish to talk to the motion in front of us? I don't wish to close, I've put the motion notes in. Amelia Lorentson 03:35:05.540
Start with an apology to the people in our community who live with a disability, to the clubs and schools who invested in this program in good faith, and to Jamila who's delivered extraordinary work in this role. I'm sorry that this amendment has not matched your effort or your trust I've been volunteering in under section before someone calls a point of order under section 11.4 of our Standing Orders I am able to share a story that arises from the agenda item in front of us and I'm going to share a personal story. I've been volunteering with the seawolf-Smitha program now for 13 years making sure that children with disability have the same chance to learn surf lifesaving skills as every other this community. In 2022 I fought for an all-access beach mat. It took years achieve something that should have been obvious. The Noosa seahorse inclusion foundation which myself and a few other members of the community built for one reason. Because we were tired of watching people with disabilities being marginalised in their own community. We started raising our own funds, providing wheelchairs at the visitor information centre, at surf clubs, helping people with disabilities buy their own cars, bringing First Nations people from cunnamulla and people with geographic barriers to Noosa to allow them the same opportunities we have to enjoy our ocean. I also sit on the SLSQ, the State disability workshop for surf life save in Queensland. Two years ago, established a dedicated diversity workshop and equity strategy and appointed a full-time officer for their first time in history. A state peak A body understood that can that you cannot embed inclusion without dedicated resourcing and yet here we are. For roughly $70,000 of council's own money over two years, this program engaged 25 sporting clubs, trained 150 people, delivered wheelchair basketball, adaptive skateboarding, walking basketball and more. And embedded inclusion into Council planning in a way that has never happened before. The report tells us that the most significant outcomes were never in the original scope. They happened because a dedicated person like Jamila with lived experience was present and empowered to act. You cannot replace that with a social policy or a committee. Noosa's median age is 50.5 years. 36 of our population is over 60. Nearly 30 live with a long-term health condition. This need is not going to diminish. Every year without a dedicated inclusion function is a choice. To let this momentum fade and to tell people who experience barriers to participation that their access is subject to budget availability. I've been generally encouraged by the steps this Council has taken in this space and this program was a real first step in the right direction but to say that I'm disappointed that there is no funding to continue is an understatement and I'm putting on record today that this Council must find a way to fund an ongoing access and inclusion function not as a nice to have but as a commitment to this community and I'm not going to stop pushing this and I won't sleep at night until this happens. Community are watching us and just simply they deserve better than us the decision that's been made today. Brian Stockwell 03:39:21.560
So, so, to talk? I will close. So, I acknowledge Councillor Lorentson's long-standing commitment and volunteer in a volunteer capacity and advocacy for people with a disability and appreciate that the speech she just gave was in relation to the amendment that didn't get going in part in that there's no decision today about whether to include or not include anything budget we haven't been put before us yet what has been recommended is that we acknowledge the work in the project so what we're waiting for today isn't in regard to whether or not to have a more permanent role that matches what has been happening with this project it's simply to acknowledge the outcomes and the learnings. I'll put the motion those in favour? That's 5, which is Councillor Wilson, Wegener, Wegener, Councillor Finzel, Phillips, Councillor Stockwell and those against is Councillor Lorentson and the vote is carried. We then move on to item 10 and that is the Fees and Charges and we have Director Margaret gatton here and manager of finance. SPEAKER_17 03:40:44.205
Good evening Councillors you would be aware whilst this report is contained within the agenda post the agenda being published on the website we discovered or we were made aware by the State government for Jessica Phillips 03:41:03.064
Right to information that there'd been a change to some of their fees that would have an impact on our Fees and Charges register and so therefore I've spoken to the CEO Amelia Lorentson 03:41:13.124
And seeking the chair's consideration that the report proper needs to be amended Margaret Gatt 03:41:22.008
To include those right to information fees and also some other administrative areas that we uncovered post the publication of the agenda. Brian Stockwell 03:41:34.802
So seeking formally I'll move the suggested motion which is that the General Committee agenda item 7.10.26.27 Fees and Charges be referred to the Ordinary Meeting for a further report. Do I have a seconder? Councillor Phillips. No need to discuss that, we know the reason for it. Anyone else wish to talk? All those in favour that's carried unanimously. Thank you. Our next item is 11 which is the Noosa Botanic Gardens master plan. We welcome Director Shaun Walsh and our parks coordinator, geordie lascelles Geordie Lascelles 03:42:27.200
Good afternoon Councillors. I'm pleased to present the Noosa Botanic Gardens draft master plan for adoption. On the Lake MacDonald is a treasured amenity space for residents and visitors that has a substantial botanic collection in a stunning waterside setting. It's increasingly recognised for its value for both Cooroy and all of its residents. Evolution to date has been largely incidental, originally involving evolving from a community initiative and the significant opportunity to improve the setting and recognise the botanic collection as well as improve visitor facilities to make the space more accessible and comfortable for all. In addition, ageing infrastructure and substandard pathways require investment to rectify established defects. The draft plan was prepared by landscape architecture consultants with key inputs from an external stakeholder group. Which Councillor Finzel was the Chair and Councillor Lorentson was on as well and sorry Councillor Phillips as well yep thank you and an internal working group and also informed by a two-phase community engagement program was there over 250 people had contributed and helped to guide the development of the plan through a series of pop-ups, activities at the gardens and at Cooroy, surveys and targeted discussions with groups including the friends of the Botanic Gardens, the wedding association and also the on-site meeting we had with the Kabi Kabi People aboriginal corporation as well. Summary of all the submissions received through both of the phases of engagement are presented in the report for council's consideration. The preparation of the draft master plan has been iterative over the last 24 months considering diverse feedback and provides a revised vision and objectives with a realistic long-term plan for upgrades and improvements. The next 25 years ensuring the gardens botanical legacy and ongoing value to the local and broader community. The vision that's in the draft is to cultivate a vibrant botanic garden that reflects the community values working with nature now and for the future. Major features of the plan include a preservation and enhancement of the botanic collection, creation of an improved visitor experience, an entry experience, improved facilities for the friends of the Botanic Gardens, creation of a promenade-grade accessible white house, wayfinding pathway around the gardens, improved activity zones that support a variety of uses as well as cultural heritage considerations such as the community cultural reflection zone. The plan will be a key platform to prioritise available future operational funds as well as attract grant funding from multiple sources. The plan has a staged framework to guide operational decision-making, investment prioritisation, and site development. Future projects will be analysed to determine the whole-of-life costs prior to the commencement and it is recognised that many of these are long-life assets and replacement of aged infrastructure. The plan provides a strategic framework for future planting and collection development through the living collection management plan that also informs the detailed design stages of the master plan implementation. So think Council can be proud of this plan and the way it will guide the gardens which are so valued by our community and it's proposed plan Brian Stockwell 03:46:27.674
Moved thank you. Happy to move. By Councillor Finzel, seconded by I think Councillor Wegener. How do you stand up? Councillor Finzel you have the floor. Karen Finzel 03:46:32.734
Yeah thank you for this report and firstly I would also like to thank the staff that have worked really comprehensively on this and if we want to look at exemplary community engagement and how Council conducted themselves through this process to ensure our reputation and that the voice was given to our community through a rigorous process that was respectful needs to be acknowledged. And I think it's really wonderful today that can come before us to make the decision around a draft plan that will inform our community over the next 25 years about how we look after and protect such a valuable asset in our community. And I'd also like to thank all the community groups that were representative at the table it was a really rigorous process around the course of that and also mindful of the extra time given at the end of the process for people to actually have their last say around that so I think it was a great opportunity to really work hard on this at every level and it is reflected in the report today so I'm pleased to support this and it's been a really wonderful process that has really given equity and voice in my opinion to every stakeholder at the table and to the broader community so thank you to everyone involved including the Councillors that were also for their contribution. Amelia Lorentson 03:48:03.826
Thank you. I just really want to make mention of the Friends of Noosa Botanic Gardens. We had a great stakeholder reference groups and really great contributions for those on the round roundtable but in particular I really want to just speak briefly about They've been pushing for this master plan for now for over ten years. Of showing up volunteering, making submissions, joining reference groups, mapping collections, identifying species and keeping the pressure on us as a Council to deliver what we're looking at today. I take home from the many consultations is that the friends reminded me, and I think to the whole group, about the soul of this place, the Noosa Botanic Gardens, and reinforced in us that the soul of actually rests in its living collection. And there were moments when we did go off track. We weren't capturing what was actually said they sit around the table and the friends pulled us in. So I want to acknowledge that. And I also the process which allowed us to be pulled back that genuinely helped empower people in this process. So thank you to the friends stakeholders. And to the stakeholder group residents. This is a community asset. It is a botanical garden. And we've just got to remember it's not just a park, it's so much particularly nurture it every day. Brian Stockwell 03:50:06.655
Thank you Nicola Wilson 03:50:07.375
For the report and following a great process on this one. By all accounts it's been a really positive experience for everyone involved. It's a really special place all want to be careful and preserve and I hope now that we can start to deliver on some of the projects within the last time. This Jessica Phillips 03:50:31.100
Actually been the first major project that I've been involved in from its early stages to this point and it's been a really valuable experience. One of the things that I appreciated most was seeing a range of voices around the table in the stakeholder group. There have been different opinions, priorities and different visions for the future of the Botanic Gardens. I still believe that there are many people in our community who wouldn't even realise that Noosa has a botanical garden. But yeah, for those that have visited, they know that it's it is not it is a very very peaceful place in our Shire. Throughout this process there has been a strong message that the gardens should be cherished for what they are. For me, one of the most important aspects of the plan is the inclusion of community infrastructure and as our community grows places where people can come together connect and enjoy the great outdoors. At the same time I feel we should never lose sight of what makes the gardens special in the first place and that's the preservation, restoration and stewardship of the gardens themselves and that must always remain priority. I also want to acknowledge the friends of the Botanic Gardens who dedicate an extraordinary amount of time effort and care for the place. They are a reminder that some of the most significant contributions to our community come from small groups of passionate volunteers working very quietly behind the scenes. I also want to add that I was grateful that the stakeholder group took on board some feedback that I presented around CPTED principles when designing with safety in mind. Whether it's through the pathways, the facilities and the open spaces, safety should always be considered as part of a good design. And as a parent who spends a lot of time in parks and community spaces, I know how important it is that these places feel welcome, functional, well maintained and safe. Think this master plan is a thoughtful plan, it respects the character of the gardens, provides a pathway for the future and recognises the importance of both environmental stewardship and the community connection, so I appreciate all the work that's going in today and pleased to support it. Tom Wegener 03:52:45.493
Yeah, just like comments reiterate. That are made around the table today. It's just a fantastic job. It's one of the things that I've seen as a Councillor over the past six years start from beginning to end and of course it started a long time before but I'd love to see the persistence of the friends and the staff. Councillor and consultants. And working together to bring this project to fruition to this plan going out. Really good, thank you. Brian Stockwell 03:53:15.869
It's good to have a really good strategic Director of the botanical Campbell gardens. This is one that we talked a lot about volunteers. This is a garden that was started by a joining neighbour who had an access handle to their lakefront house which had a dump, an old dumpy type of which they thought it might be better to have and make it a garden. And they championed some of the early work, got the great funding for the bicentennial gardens which we, you know, community basic. Planted, got the funding for the amphitheatre. What set out here is a really good direction going forward. I just thought as the debate was going on, does it reflect its situation? And one thing, it has one reference to it, and that's interface with adjoining land uses and owners to be managed, including protection of the lake's edge. One thing that's I won't ask for any changes, but we have to remember, it sits besides our drinking water, and from an agro-ecological perspective, the management approach we have to the gardens, which leads to the species selection if we're going to change it, is one where we have to take particular care with how we apply nutrients, pesticides, and any organics, because I'm not quite sure what the water quality status is when Council used to run the Lake MacDonald casualty care group, it was a water body that had high levels of nutrients in it, so it's just one thing to think about is let's focus on what we want to achieve out of the outcome, but also reflect that we know where it sits and that's right adjacent to the water that comes out of our taps. Anyone else? I forget who moved it, was it Councillor Karen Finzel 03:54:56.047
Finslie? Oh thank you. I think it's all been said and I hope that for future generations to come it is something that we can be clearly proud of and yeah, taking care of our place and being good stewards of what's before us. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 03:55:10.413
Put the motion. Those in favour? That's unanimous. Amelia Lorentson 03:55:13.953
Through the Chair can I request a five minute comfort break please? Brian Stockwell 03:55:18.813
I think that's reasonable. SPEAKER_09 03:55:21.033
We'll have a five minute, we'll make it. SPEAKER_09 04:03:08.283
Right, I'll just Brian Stockwell 04:03:16.263
So welcome back and our next item of order of business is the further report on tourism 2020. Noosa funding and performance deed 2026/2029. The author is our CEO and you'll be giving the executive summary or? Larry Sengstock 04:03:35.302
Yes, I'll provide the introduction and then Anthony and I can answer questions as a I, if you want to make them. Okay, sorry, I'll take as read but I'll give you the quick executive summary. A report on the Tourism Noosa funding and performance deed 2629 was presented to the General Committee on the 13th of April 2026 and considered by Council on the 16th At that meeting, Council resolved not to adopt the deed in its current, in its then current form and requested further refinement of the schedules of 1 KPI's appointment of Councillor to the working group and that a revised deed and KPI framework be presented to the June meeting round. This report, this further report responds directly to that resolution and presents a revised Tourism Noosa funding and performance deed and updated schedules. For Council consideration. The focus working group process was undertaken including Councillor input to review and restructure the performance framework. The revised deed restructures the original schedule 1 separating its combined deliverables and KPIs into two distinct schedules. 1: agreed obligations and deliverables and schedule 2: performance scorecard or KPIs. In addition the original adjustment methodology has been revised and simplified into a new schedule 3 performance adjustment calculation which introduces a clear scoring model linked to the scorecard. This revised structure clarifies the distinction between mandatory obligations and performance measurement, introduces a balanced scorecard approach to measuring outcomes across financial management, industry capability, destination positioning, and sustainable management, and simplifies the performance-based funding adjustments through points model. The revised deed retains the core funding model of $2 million per annum ex-GST for a three-year term with CPI indexation and a performance-based adjustment of up to $350,000 applied to the second instalment on council's annual assessment of performance. This schedule seeks Council consideration and approval of the revised deed and schedules. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 04:05:59.035
Thank you. Do we have any questions? Council Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 04:06:05.135
Can CO identify any KPI the current schedule 2 scorecard that directly measures whether Noosa residents are better off as a result of Tourism Noosa activities funded under this deed? Anthony 04:06:26.880
I think if I go back to I guess what we've put together is a whole combination of KPI's so I think to take one in isolation would probably be unfiltered probably unfair almost because it's a balanced scorecard so Councillor I think in response I would say that the combination of the balanced scorecard is certainly there. To ensure that Tourism Noosa deliver a balanced outcome for the community across the social outcomes, economic and I think if you go to schedule one certainly there's a very clear expectation around what the DMP alignment looks like and there's a long list including demand management, congestion etc so I think what you have to do to answer that question is to look at them all together and all together certainly all the work that's been done with Councillor Wilson's walson's group is to absolutely put the community at the heart driven by the DMP. You'll see DMP alignment mentioned many times which is obviously the guiding principle behind all of this so I think that's been strengthened. The community outcomes, the demand management, congestion is the balanced scorecard so I would say the combination of all these and fact that Tourism Noosa have to deliver business plans, marketing strategies to Council, to us, aligned to the DMP and that must answer the congestion management challenge. Amelia Lorentson 04:08:08.009
So maybe I should rephrase that question. The deed as it stands refers and the KPIs and scorecards. It's about organisational activity. The question I'm asking is community benefit. What independent mechanism exist under the deeds that verifies that the expenditure is delivering community benefit rather than organisational activity business as usual. Show Anthony 04:08:41.520
Again I go back to schedule one and two together and clearly that to be to deliver on the deed and then the KPIs and the schedule Tourism Noosa must deliver all these actions aligned the DMP and the DMP are the community outcomes so visit demand actively managed tourism actively contributes to environmental protection regenerative outcomes those are all the benefits to the community to the environment and to the economy so that's probably can respond otherwise I'll take our notice on a specifically answer to your question Amelia Lorentson 04:09:24.899
Performance scorecard includes and I'm just going to use this as an example again maybe still asking the same question I'm going to rephrase it the performance scorecard includes KPIs for social media engagement website traffic so how do those measures demonstrate that tourism is being managed in the interest of the Noosa community so I'm going back to what we're measuring and my previous question is how are the two linked? Anthony 04:09:58.379
Yeah I think in that quadrant three which is really where the destination positioning is again trying to really balance but to your question where are the KPIs that says to live in the community there's a specific measure around the visitation to tourism for good which will actually be for the love of Noosa and DMP aligned and that evolve over time so measuring the actual I guess engagement with that aspect of tourism noosa's marketing. Again I take it to the deliverable which it's pretty quite difficult to have individual measures and we've certainly had a first year go at this and this is reviewed annually as we all know and if you look at the third kit sorry the bottom deliverable which is a KPI which is the delivery of an annual destination marketing plan that embeds the general guide guiding principles of the DMP. Again that is where we all get I guess input into our Tourism Noosa delivering on the expectations and the outcomes for the community. Brian Stockwell 04:11:12.757
Do we have any other questions? Jessica Phillips 04:11:16.237
I do. Maybe just for people listening and for myself, just some clarity on if there's an acknowledgement that there's unintended consequences from DMP being the alignment, what mechanisms does Council have? To claw back and maybe redirect TN to something because let's say an unintended consequence suffers just being a devil's advocate what's the mechanism Councillors have to say this isn't working we're going to shift a different direction Anthony 04:12:12.140
I think that is it is the maintaining and flexibility maintaining while I work giving Tourism Noosa use in the community certainty is a difficult balance I'm certainly I think the working group has worked really well to have those quarterly and annual reviews so every quarter you'll see in schedule one action the number one is every quarter Tourism Noosa and Council sits down and reviews what's gone well what's coming up and how are we meeting expectations and is there something we need to respond to so that's a quarterly operational there's a quarterly report annual on your plan strategies so I think the answer to this is not a set and forget deed and relationship legally we review every year we can reset schedules and performance measures so I totally agree that there's a lot of uncertainty and for all of us and so this isn't this certainly not structured to say that's it for a year or three years it's three months while providing some certainty for the organisation to do the job that's how it's structured Brian Stockwell 04:13:25.571
Council. Amelia Lorentson 04:13:25.711
Terms of London in front of me I've got clause 4.2 in the deed once established the Destination Stewardship Council may provide strategic oversight in guidance to the parties for adjusting agreed obligations KPIs under course 4.1 in order to align with the DMP principles and priority actions. However, the parties are under no obligation to adopt, implement or otherwise incorporate any guidance provided by the Destination Stewardship Council. Can staff explain what purpose. Serves if its recommendations carry no obligation to respond, act, or explain a decision not to act? Anthony 04:14:11.231
Want to see the wider aspects. Larry Sengstock 04:14:14.410
We're still developing the terms of reference for the stewardship Council, but in my understanding is still an advisory body, it's not a directing body, so therefore it's still the decision of Council and staff in terms of what's recommended to go forth. So that could be into, when we do develop the terms of reference for the stewardship Council that can certainly be considered in that. But that's my understanding at this point in time is the stewardship Council is an advisory group. Jessica Phillips 04:14:49.566
Clarifying question because it's still, yeah, answers spinning in my mind a little bit. So three month mark. As Councillors though, I won't be able to influence if there is an unintended consequence because it won't come back to Council, will it? It'll be a staff process once it's gone through this. Larry Sengstock 04:15:13.506
That's potentially, but certainly if there's something that requires Council to have an involvement or to make a decision or to redirect or change, then absolutely we'd be brought back. But the three months is really a checking mechanism, and if things are going well, then continue. Anthony 04:15:29.761
If there's something that's of serious consequence, then certainly we'd come back to Council for Through the Chair, we talked about it briefly, and the way I see that maybe working for Councillors is that through the CEO potentially, just as a normal course of business, that there is an expectation that as we go through quarter by if there's particular issues that are evident or you've been approached about that they are actually channelled through the CEO as a bit more of a formal part of the quarterly review so I fully see that you have the opportunity to input again getting that balance to let the organisation go and deliver the marketing plans the outputs and the outcomes, but every quarter, Councillor should feedback through the CEO I would be normal course of business to feed into a formal quarterly meeting of Council Jessica Phillips 04:16:29.396
I've got a question perhaps for Councillor Wilson because you had a big part in this maybe just an explanation more on the performance scorecard Nicola Wilson 04:16:40.276
So that balanced scorecard approaches something I've worked on a lot in my corporate finance days for example with Caltex it's used widely in performance management for companies departments and also individuals so it kind of cascades down through an organisation and I've also taught this approach in business performance and subject of the chartered accountants program. The traditional balance scorecard quadrants are financial, customer, internal processes which would cover things like governance and safety and learning and growth so these weren't all directly relevant for TN so we adapted it to be a bit more suited to TN and more aligned to the services that we're requesting under the deed and the road map. Balance scorecard is useful because it looks at the entire organisation focusing on just one area such as financial results. It's balanced because each quadrant carries equal weight in the scoring but also in the focus that management must bring in every area to meet strategic goals. So all areas of the organisation in every quadrant need to be working together. If one quadrant fails it brings the others down too. It's also important that all KPI's and targets drive the intended behaviours. So for example a cut in expenses to meet a profit goal might cause a drop in service delivery, a loss of members or reduction in member satisfaction. So if TN can hit the member based targets it should help them to meet their so this approach helps us to view TN holistically not just as a marketing organisation but to measure the importance of industry development, member services, the visitor information centre and how they all need to be performing. Together at the same time. Brian Stockwell 04:18:29.517
Other questions? Councillor Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 04:18:33.077
Again, I'm looking at the deed in front of me and the first part of the deed recitals I.e. Tourism Noosa established as a not-for-profit company limited by guarantee in August 2001 to manage the marketing and promotion of Noosa as a tourism destination. The organisation is evolving its role as a destination management organisation. So it's going from marketing to promotion and evolving into a DMO and I've got a possible amendment that I might move up but I'm a little bit confused how we can hold or my question is how can we hold tourism needs are accountable as DMO without this defining what destination management means in terms of who's responsible for what and like I said I've got a new that I probably want to just play with the CEO. Larry Sengstock 04:19:36.424
So part of this deed and part of the deliverables is for them to review their structure and review what they stand for and how they operate so that is what that's I think that's referring to is that it's evolving into a DMO but what that actually stands for what it is something that would come through as part of the evolution of their structure and of what the organisation actually delivers. And that would be in line with us because it's part of this team so we would be part of that exercise, if that makes sense. Amelia Lorentson 04:20:16.207
So, I'm confused because I would have thought that the DMO framework would start with Council. To me, there is a question coming. So, the defunds Tourism Noosa attract and shape our visitors, but it's Council that's responsible for roads and parks and planning, etc. So, where is that clearly defined and why we're leading that role to tourism research? Should that not be something that we should be working towards, a destination management framework? Larry Sengstock 04:20:53.382
Absolutely. I'll take this on notice, Councillor, if that's okay, to come back to you with an answer. Like I said, I've got it. I'm going to give him my rewards, specifically. What the definition is, so I can bring that back to you. Sorry, it's not in the definition. No, and I need to just find that for you. Brian Stockwell 04:21:14.230
Okay, champ's a little quick now. SPEAKER_17 04:21:16.271
Could I try to answer that yes, Sir. Brian Stockwell 04:21:19.998
Would you like to try and answer that question? Tom Wegener 04:21:21.638
I think it's the destination management. You need to talk about how good what you're talking about it is. Great Noosa is. Council can sort of do that, but talking about yourself. You need a side organisation that actually promotes you as an organisation. You can't do it both yourself. Brian Stockwell 04:21:47.149
I think you're going into a wonderful debate that you can say. Amelia Lorentson 04:21:55.089
And I'll start with maybe an amendment. Brian Stockwell 04:21:58.069
We haven't moved the motion yet. Would someone like to move the motion? I'll move it. By Councillor Wilson, seconded by Councillor Wegener. Councilor Councillor Wilson, you have the floor. Nicola Wilson 04:22:07.289
All alright. Right today we're revisiting the TN funding deed and KPIs. The Roadmap was adopted in December 2025, which committed Council to two million dollars plus CPI over three years. The DMP was also adopted in December. Regardless of our individual views over the Roadmap, the DMP and the funding amount, these are frameworks we're now working towards. The Roadmap seeks TN to evolve over three years and the DMP seeks a shift towards regenerative tourism. This is what we're asking TN to deliver and what the performance payment should be linked to. As stated in the report, Council provides two million dollars per annum to support delivery of agreed services including destination marketing, visitor servicing, industry development, partnerships, research and insights. These are being measured by the KPIs. I understand that members of the community want to see changes in tourism in Noosa, fewer cars, less congestion, STA accommodation, easier parking, but these are not TN's remit. Is not a traffic management agency and nor can it influence property owners in how they use their property. Giving TN a KPI around, for example, the number of day-trippers is like giving McDonald's a KPI around obesity rates. They are not totally responsible for the problem or the solution. So can't control the figure. Visitor numbers, stays, spend, etc. are items we will continue to measure and monitor, but we can't set a reasonable target or attach it to a performance payment specifically for TN. So what can TN control? The messaging that goes to our current visitors and our future visitors, TN's members, the community and the broader industry. It can elevate and support local businesses that are making the shift to regenerative tourism, for example promoting local goods in the visitor information centre. TN is being asked to review its strategy to align with the Roadmap and the DMP, noting that its current strategy from 2020 2023 already refers to regenerative tourism, long before the DMP came around. It will then align its annual business plan and marketing plan to the strategy, as it does every year, with input from the board. Council will have visibility over the strategy, In year one, these plans are deliverables. In year two, we may choose specific metrics from those plans to become KPIs. The balanced scorecard approach means we're looking at all parts of the organisation to ensure council's funding is also balanced across the various services: destination marketing, servicing, industry development, partnerships, research and insights. The information centre's expenses are significant in the budget but it's also a significant asset for visitors and locals and for supporting local business. So it's important that it's financial viability is managed along with TN attracting more revenue for its members and becoming less reliant on Council funding. These are addressed in quadrant 1.2 has KPIs around services to members including in regenerative practices the measures are based around value for members in maintaining membership figures, net promoter scores and increased understanding post-training. Quadrant 3 is about the Noosa brand positioning. Marketing continues to be with the messaging now focused on regenerative experiences and attracting more overnight visitors. TN can control its messaging and target two specific audiences but it can't control shares that information with other people and what consumers of that information will do with it. Also can't control people doing hashtag Noosa on their holiday photographs which are then seen by everybody locally. We both see changes in behaviours immediately. But may gradually change the type of visitors we see in the next one to three years. If we see a drop in engagement in the content as the messaging shifts, TM will need to adapt in order to meet these KPIs. In the current economic climate see lower engagement with higher spend activities, so hold steady target is still challenging, as well as the impact that AI is having on the way we access information. Quadrant 4 is future focused. Training the independent agents the experiences Noosa offers and profiling local businesses engaged in sustainable practices and an independently measured scorecard in sustainability for TN. This doesn't mean other information won't be collected or reported and we know that important to the community. TN reports quarterly to Council and the insights reports tell us about changes in the industry and visitor trends. We will still monitor visitor numbers and spend and look for ways to deal with congestion and parking. We're also looking at ways to measure community satisfaction, starting with collecting baseline data. This could take a number of years to develop. That data and surveys to monitor the results. We're also not going to see a change in community sentiment overnight. I thank TN's CEO and board in working with us to reach this point over the last couple of months. We now need to let Sharon and her team get on with delivering what's being agreed through the deed, the schedules and the Roadmap. Brian Stockwell 04:27:42.706
Thank you. Other Councillors would you like to try your amendment Councillor. Amelia Lorentson 04:27:49.286
I've got a few amendments that I'm going to try. First one is that Council prepare a destination management roles and responsibilities framework clearly defining the respective accountabilities of Council, Tourism Noosa, Destination Stewardship Council and relevant agencies and that tourism noosa's deed obligations and KPIs be reviewed against that. Framework. Did I not send that to you? So just insert probably recommendation C and then maybe add a C1. Is it the first one on that list? I think so, I just played with the words a little bit. So I'll repeat that Council prepare a destination management roles and responsibilities framework clearly defining their respective, accountabilities of Council, Tourism Noosa, the Destination Stewardship Council and relevant agencies and that tourism noosa's deed obligations and KPIs be reviewed against framework. Is it taking out those first few words prior to execution? Yes, take out and request. I'm going to need some informed advice. And delete the last words prior to execution. Are you happy that's the right word now, Councillor Lorentson? Yes, happy. Any suggestions to tweak it? Brian Stockwell 04:30:00.680
The appropriateness of this at this stage rolls around. The reference to the Destination Stewardship Council as that action hasn't come before Council. Amelia Lorentson 04:30:20.151
So I'm happy to delete the Destination Stewardship Council. Think the intent is that we actually need framework. We're asking Tourism Noosa evolve manager. Into a destination management organisation without really articulating that destination management is not one organisation's job. And I just. That's the intent. Second. Brian Stockwell 04:30:53.815
Second, Councillor Phillips. Lawrington, you have the floor. Amelia Lorentson 04:30:58.155
Okay. Um, yep, so. Think it's just really important that we understand from the onset that destination management is a shared system, and it involves multiple parties, levels of governance, and they all have different responsibilities and different. Leaders. Tourism Noosa shapes the visitor, who's marketed to, when and how, and then Council builds and maintains the roads that carry the traffic, manages parks that absorb the crowds, makes the planning decisions that shape how the Shire grows, and regulate short-term accommodation market that affects housing development. Availability. Affects housing availability for residents. State government controls transport networks and environmental regulation, and there's distinct responsibilities, and I just think they need to be clearly mapped. The problem with the current as I read it, is that its language, when you start talking visitor demand management, environmental protection, community confidence in tourism, destination stewardship, that talks about the whole destination management ecosystem, and it doesn't really define where starts and ends, and where council's responsibility I look at it again from risk lens, and I just think it's potential to create risk for both Tourism Noosa and Council. Tourism Noosa could find itself accountable for outcomes it can influence, but can't control, and Council could escape accountability for outcomes that are responsibility. Just think the amendment and I met with lots of residents around this but he just sort of made the real point you can't hold Tourism Noosa accountable as destination management organisation without first defining what destination management means in terms of who is responsible for what and again it's just protections both for Tourism Noosa from unfair accountability and it also puts the onus or leans back to Council to be totally transparent about its own role. In the destination management ecosystem. Larry Sengstock 04:33:28.427
Do you want to have a quick go, or go? SPEAKER_17 04:33:31.067
No, I haven't. Brian Stockwell 04:33:35.283
So who would like to ask questions or talk to the amendment? Councillor Wegener. SPEAKER_00 04:33:42.943
I'll speak to the amendment. You said the destination marketing, tourism has that for a long time, but I've argued the whole time that destination marketing is largely council's work, taking care of the parks, the mowing, the rubbish, the cleanup, parking, transport, regulation of food, all those things, Council does. That is our remit. And but that is destination marketing as well. It is our destination. That's what we do. Tourism Noosa is a mouthpiece or a voice for Noosa Council to talk about how good we're doing this stuff. Tom Wegener 04:34:27.778
That's working with us with destination marketing. No, Tourism Noosa it doesn't pick up the rubbish but the two are so intertwined that don't think you can really define it it's in the deed really. I don't see this as a constructive piece of work. Brian Stockwell 04:34:52.924
I'll speak to it next. Firstly the reason we're doing this is this deed starts before the next meeting and it talks about once again trying to amend the deed means we would breach our responsibilities or we'd just have to give the money without any deed in the new financial year. Secondly, I think it's based on a misunderstanding of a review process within the deed and the really specific roles assigned to TN in the deed. So if we look at the table that starts on page 21, it lists ten specific areas, it talks about what the obligation is and it goes through strategy and governance, brand and marketing. Industry capability and experience development, visitor services, membership and partnership, revenue diversification, research, report and governance. And then it talks about what the deliverables. The deed really specifies what we want the role for TN to do as part of this job. The DMP at the strategic level clearly identifies by assigning who's doing what as to what the anticipated roles of various different organisations are. So what this deed does is set really clear roles for TN with a request to how are these going to evolve to better align as we go through this three-year process? So I don't see. I it to say we have to wait for the deed to identify roles. The deed really clearly identifies the roles that we've asked for. Any need for it. I think the addition of the balanced scorecard approach just reinforces the specifics of what we're looking for in terms of what we want to measure. But I don't think it moves us forward. I backwards and I can't support it others wish to talk to the Mayor, Councillor Wilson. Nicola Wilson 04:36:57.278
I don't see any need for an extra layer of frameworks to be added here. We've already got too many. I think we've got the Roadmap which says that TN needs to evolve over the next three years so because of that we need to allow a little bit of flexibility in those roles over that three years as we work through which areas of the DMP we can deliver and how we fund that I don't think that means we can really, I agree that destination management needs to be defined in the deep definitions but I don't think at this point we can say exactly what role Tourism Noosa has in that given that we're on this evolving pathway over three years we've already got TN's strategy, board having governance over TN, a Roadmap, a DMP, a deed, schedules, KPIs. I just think we need to stop and let them do work. Jessica Phillips 04:37:55.140
Okay, I'm just going to speak to support it based on intention because one of the things I like about it is looking at accountability of Council so through this whole process that I found during reflecting of the process from day has been my feeling of closed government governance loops where there's not enough accountability on everyone involved to be resident focused I completely agree demand congestion management that's not really Tourism Noosa can influence that ways that would community see but our role we've got to find the data instead of sort of making decisions still based on so many complex feelings it's to me it's still we've two years in and I'm like traffic data from there's so many things that would help us make this not so murky if we just had black and white evidence in front of us other all of the noise that came in you know election process pro around don't fund tourism no Sir it all of that would be so much easier to insight if it was clearer on what our role is and what their it's so murky that I think it confuses everyone I always like to go what is the problem we're trying to fix before I make any decisions still actually don't know if all of us would probably have all different opinions as what today. I think Councillor Lorentson is trying to add some more accountability I can't see that as a negative even if you know the wording isn't perfect don't see any I couldn't not support anything that gives maybe more transparency I think the one thing is that it's just too unclear there's too many opinions anything that makes me be able to answer what's the problem we're trying to fix because I don't know about anyone else but I think it's more murky than ever. Brian Stockwell 04:40:19.005
Okay, others? Councillor Lorentson would you like to close? Amelia Lorentson 04:40:25.025
I do. I appreciate the opportunity to put the amendment at the table. I'm going to start with just some comments not around the table that you know the responsibilities are intertwined. I don't agree with that. In fact, I think totally the opposite. Destination management involves different parties with different responsibilities and different levers. And that needs to be clarified and clarity is for Tourism Noosa. Clarity is so that they're not unfair not being blamed for issues that sit with the SA council's remit. I've just completed the company director's course, so every decision and everything I write at the moment has a governance. Lens. So so we're asking, and I'm also legally trained, so when I go through the deed and the first part is under a definition that we're making a marketing organisation evolve into a destination management organisation. That's great. But we haven't even defined what is, so to me that just is a governance oversight. It's a risk. So what I'm asking here is that we have clarity from the start, so we're not addressing these issues in year one, two, year three. It's about setting the foundations right, so we're measuring the right things. So anyway, like I said, I've thrown it on the table. I think it's 101. Don't think it's redundant. A governance obligation, so. I'm happy to accept the majority vote across the table. But again, I'll leave you with the quote. The resident who sits in strategy says, "You can't hold Tourism Noosa accountable as destination management organisation without first defining what destination management means." Needs. Brian Stockwell 04:42:57.425
Okay, I'll put the vote. Those in favour? That's Councillor Lorentson and Councillor Phillips. Those against? That's Councillor Wilson, Wegener, Finzel and Stockwell. The amendment is lost. We go back to the original motion. Do we have anyone else who. Amelia Lorentson 04:43:43.720
That's the deed be amended to require Tourism Noosa deliver a peak demand management plan to Council by 31st of December 31st 2026 identifying high locations and periods and specifying actions within tourism noosa's direct control to manage visitor demand, distinguishing tourism noosa's actions from those requiring Council or other agencies with annual progress reporting. Do we have a seconder? I haven't a second. Councillor Phillips. Lorentson, you have the floor. DMP commits to actively managing visitor demand. Reducing pressure on high use areas and peak periods. It's one of the clearest and most consistently expressed community priorities in the entire DMP consultation process. Yet the current deed contains no mechanism that would cause Tourism Noosa actively manage or moderate visitor volumes at any time or in any location. Tourism Noosa shapes the visitor. It determines who's marketed to, when they're encouraged to visit, and what they're told about how to experience Noosa. That's one of the most powerful demand management tools available in the destination management system. And it's a tool that only Tourism Noosa holds. A peak demand management plan puts that tool to work in a structured and accountable way. The requirement distinguish is that the plan distinguishes between actions Tourism Noosa will take and those actions requiring Council or other agencies what they're going to take. Me when I look at amendment a there's accountable some ambiguity in terms of accountability so so again I talk about this as a protection for Tourism Noosa it's it actually will set it up to succeed because it won't be held responsible for outcomes that's beyond its control so again we talk about you know they can't control visitor demand disagree I think they can and a peak demand management plan is a mechanism or a tool that we can actually measure that so again open for discussion and happy to accept the decision of the majority- Can I ask a question? You may. What specific actions are within tora's and noosa's control? They determine who's marketed to. So if there is, for example, they identify hot spots in, for example, Christmas peak period in Hastings Street, they should AIS. Have an AI strategy that someone that goes into AI types in what to do in Noosa at Christmas will tell them go to king markets and have a look at the markets. At the market. At go and visit Pomona markets on the weekends. Or go to the, go to Peregian markets, etc. But give them, or our regional gallery, go to or go to Noosaville and go to our enterprise precinct. We have so many unbelievable places, but they, they're our warts. They're the ones that tell people, at this time of year, it's busy, and let's disperse people into areas that aren't highly visited. So, so again, it's, I'm trying to respond to what the community have been very loud and vocal over the whole destination management process that risk is during peak demand. That's when our national parks and our features, and that's when it's hard to get into. So, so we've got to throw some responsibility back to Tourism Noosa in asking what you communicate during that how do you communicate or market during that period and whether that aligns with our dispersal policies. Karen Finzel 04:48:39.745
I just have a question around that. When we look at the schedule that sets out the agreed obligations to be completed by TN under the deed on page 21, it addresses those matters that are being raised. So I'm just wondering, do we need to drill down to something that's specific? Like it looks at visitor demand and actively managed to reduce pressure on high use areas in peak periods, how to move around the destination. I just, I don't know, we need to be drawn down? I feel like. Brian Stockwell 04:49:20.744
I'll go to staff if you like. I think it's clear what you're questioning is does the existing deed cover the issues that Councillor Lorentson. Karen Finzel 04:49:27.924
Yeah, I feel like it's clearly written down on page 21 or 26 that those things are listed under the purposes of the deed. And then if you go down further, like for example on page 22 or 26, item number 6, membership and partnerships, TN actively and proactively engage with local business, environmental groups to identify collaboration opportunities to advance the DMP values, principles and actions in the Roadmap and deliver options paper for shared services. So I sort of think. I just don't know how far down our role is today to like is this a like an opportunity or a risk to introduce something this specific given I feel like it's covered under these obligations. Under the date. Brian Stockwell 04:50:27.127
Anthony, do you have a response to that question? Anthony 04:50:29.827
Yeah yeah I tend to agree that version of this and it's whether detailed enough I think that's the question is schedule one agreed obligations and then really it's a list of aligning and so there's a whole list not limited to but here's all the and it specifically says visit the demand is actively managed to reduce pressure and high demand use areas in peak periods including how people travel and move around the destination so that's one example of many of what does the DMP alignment then when you go into schedule two which is the scorecard the responsibility to deliver an annual plan and a marketing plan aligned to the DMP obviously we will be measurement assessment says have you actually enacted what one and DMP alignment looks like this your annual plan does it mention demand management has it got an action for our demand management and then the other one Councillor you refer to other specific KPIs in the other quadrants that I guess contribute to demand management I think it's an obvious area that is one of our biggest challenges and Councillor Lorentson at the start asked what does the community benefit well good demand management and a good action plan business marketing plan and has to reflect that so that's what we would be assessing Tourism Noosa on is their plans and then the delivery every quarter Karen Finzel 04:51:59.158
Yeah I guess my question is how critical is it that we actually lock that into a peak demand management plan today as opposed to in my opinion it's covered here but do we need to be I guess that specific? Anthony 04:52:20.134
I guess my opinion is we have a tourism noosa's role and you know we're trying to define the deed defines Tourism Noosa. Role in the wider challenge of demand management peak demand management plan to me is a whole of destination which falls probably more under the Destination Management Plan, stewardship, Council, etc. So I'd like to see your on that. Larry Sengstock 04:52:48.285
Through the Chair, my position on this is that I think it is already incorporated into the deed if we get into too much specifics the idea with the deed was to try to keep it a little bit higher level so that we could um and it is a document where we work with tourism Noosa's so it's not leading letting tourism Noosa's go off and do their own plan their own marketing plan it's with our advice and our guidance and that's the idea of the three-month quarterly review so that we can look at is it working is it not working what other things do we need to bring in if it's AI how do we incorporate AI into the planning that's the idea of this to evolve so it's a deed it's not a it's not think it's covered in here is my opinion Nicola Wilson 04:53:39.273
Can I speak to it? Or did you want to question it? I think to I think trying to throw in additional obligations at this point undermines the work that the working group what kingbroke has been doing, where we've had specific representatives from Council and TM to work through all of these things together and work out if they're achievable, measurable and all of those things. And we did try to keep the balance scorecard quite high level and strategic so that we're working towards strategic goals and not getting too much into the operational even though there are some that maybe do fall into that a little bit. I do think this is already covered in the data, the bit that Anthony read out. Visitor demand is actively managed to reduce pressure on high use areas and peak periods. We already know where the high pressure locations are. And periods are, I think we need a plan to do that we don't need more plans. People who are here in January peak period are not being marketed to for accommodation and things because they're already here. They've already responded to marketing a year or two years ago. I don't know if that many people are accessing TN to find out what to do once they're already here. There's lots of other places they can source information as well so that means that TN doesn't have direct control over all of the information that visitors will be seeing in their will we can't tell if what TN's doing helps to manage visitor demand or disperse people into other areas. It wouldn't be able to prove it in any way. Yeah so they're getting information from all different places whether it's word-of-mouth marketing because they've been here before. We wouldn't know if TN's messaging actually makes people SPEAKER_17 04:55:26.212
Change their behaviour. Can I just say I think although I get the intent I actually think peak demand management almost sits with Council but I understand the first amendment would have captured this because it would have been under some framework that would have assisted what I think Councillor Lorentson's trying to do and I'm not speaking for on your people's behalf but it's more around like one of the things that I feel is that the roles aren't clear Nicola Wilson 04:55:55.243
And community are so I think Jessica Phillips 04:55:57.359
We'll keep going around until because there's still not clarity but that with clarity the only way you can clear the air for people is actually to say 280 cars that go in Hastings Street this is the right this is where that car those cars come from they're Peregian from Coolum Sunshine Coast Council they're like we don't actually have none of us can confidently say congestion is from tourism so that's we're going to keep going around until we actually like I understand why you put this because it would have given maybe some data because you can't lie with that you can't actually get on Facebook and debate that's not correct if you've got data that says this is how many residents are actually in and out causing congestion we don't know that so I feel like until we know that we will sit here and there will still be continued those people will be in communities still unsure about what is going because they blame Tourism Noosa for traffic congestion and we can't negate that because we haven't invested in any infrastructure helps us determine where our demands are so even though I understand the amendment Amelia I think that actually would sit with up with Council many years ago in developing really clear evidence to support tourism do what we do because the roles aren't clear and that's why it will continue to be an issue every single election and every year we will sit here and have the same conversation because we can't debate it the other way got we've no data to support either side of the party so I get what I just I don't think it's tourism's role but I know why you're trying to I know what achieve but I still I think Council should have done some of this years should be investing in infrastructure that helps us get the figures so we can be on a dashboard and someone can see actually you know what some of those residents coming into Hastings Street they're from Cooroy and then you're not going to be able to winch with that they're all Noosa Shire residents I don't know is it really that sorry I'm done Brian Stockwell 04:58:24.741
I'll speak to it I think Councillor Finzel raised the question this is an opportunity or is this a risk and I come from the latter the risk is we just introduced after months of deliberations and refining and defining and specifying a new term called a peak demand management plan so I just asked online what is for tourism and it's not what we're talking about what plan and I'm about to be signed out. A strategic approach designed to manage the high demand for tourism services during peak periods to the plans are crucial for ensuring the tourism destinations can meet the increased demand. That's about facilitating demand, whereas I think what we're trying to do, and the destination meant, reduce the impacts on the residents and the environment of peak periods. However, what it says is these normally include demand forecasting, TN, in the deed and does very well is that data. They talk about dynamic pricing, that's for industry. Guest segmentation, understanding the diverse needs and preferences of guests. That's something TN already does. Talks about adding extra taxis and it talks about making sure you invest more resources to cater for peaks. Pigs. I don't think that's what we're interested in from a dartmire management. It's one of the risks is introducing these things that may be in the mind of the mover quite clear, but when it comes to implementing, quite complicated. And if you look at it, manage visitor demand. Noosa direct corral to And I don't think that's really clear as to how what tourism and net it's probably not what we want to assist us to reduce the impact of visitors during peak periods. So I can't support it. Anyone else wish to talk? Amelia Lorentson 05:00:32.892
Again, I think people are just not reading what's actually up on the screen. The idea is to identify high pressure locations and periods. What tourism noosa's direct control, distinguishing tourism noosa's action from those of councils and other agencies. So I keep coming back to, you know, whether it's the destination management organisation framework, whether I'm talking about a peak demand management plan, it's about articulating clear roles and responsibilities and removing risk. Not adding risk, it's removes the risk. Of being unfairly made to be accountable for stuff that's outside your remit. Also, again, you know, my governance lens asking people to become a management organisation, but we haven't defined what we're asking people to manage visitor demand, peak is. And I go back to why we've actually revised the deed. And we've because the community has asked us to ensure that the accountability measures that we put in the deed reflect the investment, $6.2 million investment over three years. So I'm here around the table, this is higher level that we're working with Tourism Noosa, but I think we've got to also remember that we work for the community and the community throughout this process has demanded more accountability. That's why this came back to Council, not to make it easier, but to ensure that the accountability measures, again, are measurable against the $6.2 million of OKS money investment in the Tourism Noosa body. So, again, respect the conversation around the table, but I think our job here is to ensure that we're actually listening to the community that's put us around the table. Brian Stockwell 05:03:02.835
I put the amendment. Those in favour? It's Councillor Lorentson. Those opposed? It's Councillor Wilson, Wegener, Councillor Finzel, Phillips and Councillor Stockwell. The amendment is lost. Have we got anyone else who wishes to? Amelia Lorentson 05:03:20.421
Yes, Councillor Lorentson. So insert into recommendation C that schedule 2 be amended to include the following auditable marketing KPIs verified annually through tourism noosa's advertising platform records provided to Council as part of the annual outcome report and one no report advertiser targeting residents within a hundred and fifty kilometres of Noosa. I want to delete number two and make two a measurable annual reduction in marketing activity directed at day trip catchments I'm taking that out. Brian Stockwell 05:04:28.440
Delete number you happy with this? That? Yeah. Do we have a seconder? I just need to read namesprayed it, sorry. Sure. Councillor Lorentson, you've got the floor. Amelia Lorentson 05:04:44.000
Again, I'm going to start with a lot of the recommendations. I spend time in community, meeting with residents on all sorts of issues, this was an idea that was put to me by some residents and I played with it, so I want to start by saying that the current schedule 2 performance scorecard has 20 KPIs and not one tells Council where Tourism Noosa is directing its paid advertising. Not one measures whether council's money is being spent reaching the visitors the DMP says Noosa wants to attract and not one reflects the DNP's central and explicit commitment to quality over quantity and overnight visitors day-trippers to me that's a really big gap in the six point two million dollar funding agreement and I think again I think the KPIs or the amendment in front of us the intent is to try to close that gap DUP commits Council to quality over quantity visitors daytrippers day trippers higher value low-pressure tourism that delivers economic benefit to the community without overwhelming its infrastructure environment and liveability but a policy that's not reflected in the performance framework of the paid to deliver it is not a policy it's just you know wish. The current scored card doesn't require Tourism Noosa direct its marketing at overnight visitors and it doesn't prevent tourism it Noosa's from spending ratepaying ratepay money advertising Noosa to people within 150 kilometres who will drive up for the day use the beaches and roads and drive home without spending a night or contributing meaningful to the local economy. Day visitors use noosa's assets but they don't fund them and I do have to note day visitors are also good for some parts of the economy and I do want to acknowledge that. Residents fund our assets through our rates. Overnight visitors accommodation spending and the broader economic activity that sustains local businesses and employment. Tourism Noosa is using council's money to attract day visitors from and the Sunshine Coast. It's actively working against what council's own plan says tourism in Noosa should look like. And again, that's the purpose of the KPIs. All the amendment in front of us. So. KPIs KPI's they're not there to measure visitor behaviour. What I'm asking, or the intent behind the amendment, is that we've got. An opportunity to measure advertising decisions, but targeting records for every paid campaign Tourism Noosa runs already exists in its own advertising accounts. We can go to the google ads records. And we can find out exactly what geographic areas have been targeted, how much has been spent on each audience. The META's advertising platform does the same thing. So what I'm saying is that information already exists. We can already measure where they advertise. So what I'm asking again is not onerous. We're not asking Tourism Noosa commission or purchase the data. Or it already exists, and it exists in Council Tourism Noosa and managers and controls and funds with Council money. So it should be able to be provided to Council at any time with no additional cost. You know, go back to, we get told a lot that marketing campaigns are effective at influencing visitor behaviour. But we need to be measure that outcome against specific KPIs and that, again, doesn't exist in the performance and funding agreement. So, what I'm asking is, I think this is an opportunity for us to actually measure that. Whether or not their marketing campaigns are actually effective in influencing our day-trippers. And the information already exists. Tourism Noosa has that information. So again, throw it at the table. And again, I throw that we've got to remember why we're sitting here providing services. Revising the funding agreement, and that is because our community has asked us to ensure that the accountability measures that we put in place. A commensurate against the investment of a three-year funding agreement. Brian Stockwell 05:10:26.302
Thank you. Would anyone like to talk to the amendment, Councillor Wilson? Nicola Wilson 05:10:30.724
Again, I think this undermines the work of the working group. This could have been shared with if it was to be considered. You can't really throw in extra KPIs into a balanced scorecard because it wouldn't be balanced any more. I did receive lots of suggestions from members of the public and I thanked them. I had various conversations as well and I considered everything that I was sent and I brought anything that I thought was relevant and measurable the working group and I admit quarter three was hardest one to try and come up with KPIs because all we can really measure is engagement with the material, the content that TN's putting out and not what people do with it. I don't believe TN actually is spending any money targeting residents within 150 kilometres of Noosa already so without a baseline and a target we can't actually add it into the scorecard anyway but I would say that baseline is already zero. So we're giving them a target of zero again which they'd be silly if they were spending money on those people because all of those people already know Noosa Shire and that in so they can reach it within a day. Believe they're spending any money on locked-in activity directed at daycare patients. Again, this is something we would have to discuss with Sharon in the working group of where that baseline figure sits and then you would have to have, rather than a measurable level, annual reduction, the target would be how much you actually want to spend on that marketing activity. But I don't know if Neil or Larry would have anything to add there, but I believe that's already probably I think it's probably zero or close to it. Tom Wegener 05:12:11.327
So, A hundred and fifty corners, the Majestic Theatre of malaga, relies on people from within kilometres. Are you saying that tewars and Noosa will not be able to put an advertisement in for the Saturday? Um, movies or things or events at the theatre or Pomona markets or kinnikin markets that actually want people from that hundred and fifty mile, kilometre pace, because they depend on it. Amelia Lorentson 05:12:46.470
I think this is really quite specific to Sunshine Coast and those that are commuting to our, again, we had a visitor management peak plan. It's the hot spots. Brian Stockwell 05:13:09.780
That I'll talk to him, my understanding is the only time Tourism Noosa has ever directly marketed to the drive market is during COVID. There is argument out in the community about, well, any advertising or promotion following on Facebook or any media will also get people who are within that 150, but it's not targeting them. As was mentioned, the reporting we get from Tourism Noosa quite clearly outlines what each campaign, who it's targeted at, whether it's New Zealand, whether it's Melbourne. We already have that information. And the-- I think there's some statements about there's no way where it's stated that we don't want to do this. I think it's really clear in the obligations that the marketing campaign is to. Be 100% consistent with the Destination Management Plan objectives and aims and outcomes desired, and obviously the DMP does have specific provisions around the drive market, so I don't think it's desirable or necessary. Anyone else? Jessica Phillips 05:14:21.511
I'll just reiterate that we wouldn't be having the conversation if we had the data to support the vehicles and management of daytrippers if we knew where they were coming from, it would be an easier conversation. Many of the people that I know that have not been able to afford to now live in Noosa are living in Peregian springs. Here, their kids go to school here. Are they a resident? I'd say they are. I don't think we have enough clarity. We won't after today either, so I'll still be uncomfortable in me the process but until we invest in some technology that provides accurate data, we'll continue to have the same conversation in years to come. Karen Finzel 05:15:15.742
Just in terms of risk, if we restrict no paid advertising targeting with 150 kilometres, and I think it was only through COVID, and we would certainly, I mean, I'm not 100% sure, but we would have data to show at that time during COVID that marketing. To that 150 kilometres coming into our Shire saved many a small business, kept our, like, tourists open some degree to actually get us through COVID and everybody worked collectively. You know, to do that. There was a quick pivot by Tourism Noosa at that time to address a health crisis. I, yeah, I am very about limiting that because if we've got to pivot because of some disaster, I think it's prudent that we look at, like, how do we then put a measure of protection around in that space when we pivot? If we have something as targeted as, like, no paid advertising within 150k, if we had that restriction during COVID, we wouldn't, like, pull through. And in terms of the reduction in, you know, what we call day trippers that, you know, some of those people that come up in the data are through, they've bought properties here. They might come up on the weekend and travel from Brisbane. I mean, they pay rates here. They are part of that cohort of people. Are in a car driving up here and using all our services, infrastructure, coming to our events, all that, so I think it is a measurable reduction in that activity to day trip catchments, I think. Again, risk or opportunity, I think too much restriction in that space might now, could lead towards those unintended consequences where we've drilled down that deep on that, we can't pivot if there's a disaster. Brian Stockwell 05:17:31.718
Okay, I think that's everyone Amelia Lorentson 05:17:33.678
Who's talked. Councillor Lorentson, you wish to close. Just in response with Councillor Finzel, we have a course in short course which actually addresses the very issues that we're talking about. If there are any external shocks or forces of COVID, there's opportunities for realignment and agility is the basis of that force majeure. In terms of measuring annual reduction, I'm not talking about day trips. That have homes here, they will continue to come here. The wording is very clear, it's in marketing activity directed at day trip catchments. I'm talking about marketing. We're not going to stop people. From coming here, but we have an opportunity in this amendment to reduce new Again, probably what I want to say, again, respect the conversation. My job is to work for the community and that's what I'm trying to do in terms of these amendments. But I am hearing a lot in the repetition of we're undermining the working group. I think we need to put that in context that we also risk undermining the trust that this community has placed in us as elected representatives. So again, respect the decision of this Council in terms of the amendment that's been placed in front of us. Brian Stockwell 05:19:03.485
I've put the amendment data in favour. It's Councillor Lorentson. Those not in favour is Councillor Wilson, Wegener, kinzell, Phillips and Stockwell. The amendment is lost. We come back to the initial motion. And currently Councillor Wilson is the only one who's talked to it. Anyone else like to talk to the substantive motion? Will. I wrote down three words. Articulated, coordinated, integrated. So the coordinated, integrated is essential if we want to get to a sustainable system of delivery around destination management. The articulated is what's really relevant to this particular item. Have we clearly articulated the expectations of Tourism Noosa deliver under the funding agreement over the next three years? And for me it's a resounding yes. I think the improvement that the working group has done since we good. They've been, added a lot of clarity. I think Council wilson's opening address was once again a really clear articulation about what we are doing here today. What is the scope of our deliberations and what can we expect out of Tourism Noosa? I do think that the deed does take the next step in coordination of the coordination between Noosa Council and Tourism Noosa deliver the Destination Management Plan. I think there is good provisions in there to ensure that we will have a coordinated outcome. Reflecting back that only a few years ago we had this partnership agreement that had very little in terms of any specific specifications about what the Tourism Noosa would do for the money that Council gave it. But that leaves us with the last one: integrated. And don't think we're there yet. And that's because a key component of getting integration will be the setting up of the Destination Stewardship Council. Because that's where the design of that, if it's done well, will integrate the community perspective, industry Council perspective, as well as the broader government perspective in how we sustainably manage tourism to ensure that community values are upheld and the impact on our social and environmental ecosystem such that they are not being degraded and that our economy is still supported by those who visit us. So I think we are at a good spot in terms of being able to support the deed and being confident as Councillors that it does achieve the objectives as set out in the Destination Management Plan. Tom Wegener 05:22:04.470
Anyone else like to talk? Why not? I'll just say quickly I'd like to thank Councillor Wilson for stepping in and using her expertise to help guide this process and I think that something Councillors should be able to do is use their expertise that they've come to the Council to do share their expertise and help guide the community in a positive way. So thank you. That's Brian Stockwell 05:22:32.609
I think I saw a hand over here, Councillor Finzel? Jessica Phillips 05:22:35.209
Oh no. Yes I'll speak to it. Firstly, I would also like to acknowledge Councillor Wilson's persistence and commitment through the process. I very much appreciated the work that you have put into it. I'll circle back to my main points. What is the problem that we're trying to fix? I don't think, well actually I know from the moment I started these discussions I've been incredibly clear on what I accept and don't accept because I'm extremely principle based it's the only thing that I have is at the end of the day so when I sit in this Chair I think about Councillors ' me and then I feel like I'm just warming the seat so while I'm here six million dollars of ratepayers' money has to be spent incredibly wisely we had an obligation to absolutely at foremost. It is in our money to spend so that's Nicola Wilson 05:23:49.687
It's not we it's not our own business so we have six million dollars over three years and what's the problem we're trying to fix Jessica Phillips 05:24:03.100
We would have to probably agree that community feel that traffic congestion is probably the biggest part of why they feel overwhelmed in their town that it's being sort of taken over with tourism however we can't back that up with anything to negate that it's right or wrong I feel like the decisions for me like my hands tied behind my back a little bit sitting here so I've never had an issue with Tourism Noosa I think that they play an incredible part of our economy do ratepayers should fund it? I think there was a loss in transparency when it went from the levy so from that moment community have wanted to understand more than ever where their money is going and that's because most households now are watching every dollar. They're watching their fuel tank, they're watching cost of living and so what they're asking us to do as a Council is be incredibly conscious with their money. That's how they feel every time they choose to pay their rate Bill instead of going on a holiday. They put their utilities up the front and they pay it off or they you go without. So I have an obligation to them to spend money wisely and I still feel that the part that. Where I got poured out the most about being able to support this was when it aligned so much with DMP because I still can't like my principles say there's no way I can say that there was errors in DMP and then support funding to go and implement a strategy that I still don't think has been tested that would be I wouldn't be able to sleep at night because that questions every part of my integrity I didn't support DMP because I don't think it's been tested I don't want a governing board an external Tourism Noosa to be responsible for it because I think we haven't tested it enough to know I think we're asking Tourism Noosa pivot from where they've traditionally been without any evidence to support why we're asking that and although I see it happening all the time and it's probably the way local government works for me I feel that we can't endorse the strategy and ask someone else to deliver it because there's no clarity in who's responsible for if it fails or if it succeeds so I'm still incredibly uncomfortable about the process how I got here to this point I've got no issues making decisions that's never been something that I've worried about but I need to go home and sleep soundly that's pretty much the test for me so unfortunately today I still just don't feel I think you've done so much work absolutely and the staff like I it's nothing to do with that I just I'm still not comfortable from this day one and I haven't been the able to influence decisions any way for me to say that I had a role or I had a voice at the table because nothing that I brought to any of the workshops around Tourism Noosa or DMP have actually been listened to or implemented. So my hands behind my back so the only way I can stand up for the residents is by not voting for it which is really difficult if I to be put in that position that's all left is my hand at the end of the day. Brian Stockwell 05:28:16.255
Okay, hey Councillor Wegener or, oh no I have Councillor, yeah Wegener I have you at, no I haven't got you speaking or Councillor. I have three words, I said thank you and Councillor. So Morrison. Amelia Lorentson 05:28:39.173
Yeah I'll speak. Today what's in front of us and what are committed to is 6.2 million dollars of rate-paying money to Tourism Noosa and I think what I've been, you know, again, reading the performance deed and we're giving that money based on performance that's going to be measured almost entirely on its own internal activities. Social media engagement, website traffic, membership numbers, training attendance. Indeed, submissions. Reports keep coming back to none of those measures tell us whether a Noosa resident is better off and that's the question that the community have been asking us. We go back to the Destination Stewardship Council. The amendment that I'll try to put through. That was our community voice. It was a mechanism that was built into the deed but according to the deed it can still be ignored without explanation or consequence. The community that participated in the DMP process participated on the understanding that the invoice would shape tourism governance in the Shire. That's what they were told and the body established to carry that forward, the destination stewardship according to Nadine, it's still purely advisory. After today, when a resident comes up to us and asks us, and they will, six point two the $6.2 million that dollars that we're committing today. Is going to make tourism work better for this community, I don't know about you, but I'm not going to have a straightforward answer. We have organisational activity metrics, that's what's in the deed. We'll have social media numbers, that's report submissions, But we won't have what the community has asked for, which was an independent measure of community experience, and that was my attempt through all the many failed amendments that I put through. We're not going to have auditable evidence that council's money is being directed at the right markets. We won't have a clear map of who's responsible for what in the destination management system. I'm going to put on record I am not going to be supporting this motion and not because I'm against Tourism Noosa not succeeding I believe tourism is bad for this community. Tourism done well is one of the best things that can happen to a place like Noosa. It sustains local businesses, our neighbours, mums and dads, it supports local employment, my kids, and it generates the economic activity that flows through to every corner of this community. Well, tourism is good for everyone. But tourism done well requires accountability. It requires a performance framework connected to community outcomes. Requires honesty about who's responsible for what. It requires a community voice to be genuinely heard and it requires an organisation receiving two million dollars a year of public money to prove its value in terms of the whole community where can see and verify, not just parts that already believe in it. That was the standard that I was trying to move today and unfortunately the strangford did not support it. So I cannot in good conscience support a deed that falls short of it. And I'm going to. Close by reiterating what I said part of the amendment discussions. Lot of mention was made about we can't undermine the working group. Again, we've got to remember who we work for. And what we are potentially undermining is, again, the trust this community has placed in all of us around this table, remembering that $6.2 million is money that my husband works seven days for, I work So, unfortunately, today, I cannot support the deed in its current form. Karen Finzel 05:33:59.747
Oh, this is a really difficult, challenging decision. I mean, there was decisions prior to today that were ratified by Council that now I have to respect that I did not support. So, to start, I guess, with a clean slate and the matter before us is about the funding deed. What I generally don't support is status quo. I mean, I think it's been a rough ride to get to this point, without a doubt. It was an election campaign as we all know, and the community at the time didn't want that money spent on tourism, given the impacts, and understand that. When we look at it from my perspective around, I can only speak for myself, around that addressing status quo, we have tried to attempt with the tools we have before us to address the status quo. And that goes right back to taking it out of the levy on the rates. Because that initially was set up, in my opinion, to what I was told was because it was an emerging industry and the cash was constrained to help build that. Now that served us for 25 years. We got to this point. In terms of addressing status quo and looking at it through another lens with robust and rigorous debate around what is before us, it still has not been, in my opinion, been a clear cut off here, start again. Now, Councillors, that moment was gone. That moment came before we went to that meeting in December. Where, prior to that, we had an opportunity to end the agreement as it was through written correspondence to TM. Now, if I could roll time back, I'd go, "Hell yeah, I would have voted for that." Because we would have started at an absolute clean slate when we talk about addressing the status quo. Now, that did not happen, so we've arrived here today trying go through these murky waters and collectively, between our community, taking on board their voice, which matters. I'm because here of their voice, I take that seriously. And I work hard to engender that trust in my community. We've looked at the other stakeholders, all the people that sit around the table, the business owners, the small schools, everyone in this Shire is affected. By tourism in another. One way or the other. We've talked to our peak body, which I challenged on more than one occasion at this table around a definition. Were they an LTO? RTO? And here today we've got Councillor Lorentson asking again for definition as we head into a DMO. And it's really unfortunate that we couldn't do that. I mean, I looked up online. I can tell you a DMO, what is it? It's a destination management organisation, maybe public, private or hybrid entities that promote a location and work with its stakeholders to build a rich experience as well a living in complex times. Change and being facilitators of change is our role as leaders in our community today. This, in my opinion, is straightforward. Yes, we need data. Yes, we do the best of our ability with what sits before us to make these very challenging decisions in a very moveable landscape. It is like shifting sands from day to And community, right, for the single parents, those that are living, you know, in a car. Those people are trying to budget, send their kids to school and live on a single income in one household. We've got so many challenges before us there is no easy answer in how to make these decisions. I feel like we're emerging in this space of tourism it is a sector that we cannot ignore in my opinion we can't just like cut off and go like cut that off we have to work together as a collective and I think we're inching towards that even though there's deficiencies this how it's presented and how we've arrived here it's not been a straight line and in my experience life is not it is messy it is like we expose our weaknesses we've got to look at our strengths we've got a balance risk and opportunity it is a real challenge and the other challenge and I'm gonna say it because I think that like the Mayor yeah he had other obligations today but I think to you know also make this decision without the bear at the table when we're talking for leadership around the table. Brian Stockwell 05:39:09.933
You've bridged your five minutes and you're straying into territory that's not related to the motion. Karen Finzel 05:39:17.219
Thank you Mr Chair. Brian Stockwell 05:39:20.679
Okay, Councillor Wilson. Nicola Wilson 05:39:24.579
Thank you for all the comments around the table and I do agree with the challenges that we've had in this process. I've been quite vocal about that. Previous meetings about the steps that led us to this point including a decision over a one-year agreement into Roadmap for three years. So personally I didn't support the DMP for the Roadmap. But I do respect that's now a Council decision and that regardless of how everyone votes today, we're still committed to giving tourism Noosa for $2 million per year regardless of whether you agree with this thing. So working with that, I'll repeat a few things I said at the start. Whatever the DMP funding amount, we are stuck with that decision of $2 million over three years. And what we've been working on in the working group this last few months is trying to just make the best of that and try and develop some KPIs that lead us towards the strategic goals. That team leaders are used to support delivery of agreed services including destination marketing, visitor servicing, industry development, partnerships and research and insights. With respect, it's not about finding out whether the community is better off as a result of tourism but I would love for someone to suggest a KPI on that um because we'd happily add it in but um from all the different suggestions I got from the community there was nothing that we could use to measure that so I do welcome feedback on that but it's is not actually what we're asking tourism is deliver on. Um but we have had conversations that say that we will look for ways to set some baseline data over community sentiment and absolutely measure that over time but right now it isn't something that we can measure because we don't have a baseline or a methodology um in terms of the marketing um while we might not be prescriptive in the KPIs about how much money is spent where Council will have visibility over the marketing plan um which does specify the campaigns it's normally a summer campaign a winter campaign maybe a couple of others um sort of activity based potentially so we will know exactly what those campaigns will be in advance and know where that money is being spent um but we are moving into uncertain economic times and TM will have to adapt to conditions to support their members and support the industry so we can't be too restrictive on where they can spend marketing if as the year progresses and we get updates things have changed and they need to divert their spending somewhere else that's TM at the end of the day is a separate entity with its own CEO and own board and they have to make those decisions to make sure that they're supporting industry and as well as the community. If we see a drop in engagement because people are not spending money on holidays anymore because they don't like the regenerative messaging then TM is going to have to adapt to that. We need to give them the freedom and flexibility to do that. In terms of the making two references to undermining the working group. What I mean by that is we've spent two months looking at many, possible KPIs and trying to get this balanced approach and that compared to throwing a suggestion in at the last minute to decide on the fly. I think that's unfair to the process. That was and as I said, I have received many suggestions from people that have been tested with the up at the end of the session. So I think I will end up there. Certainly I'm not excited to be in this position either, but we have tried to make the best of what we've gotten, come up with something that gives us some strategic direction for the next year, noting that only the first year. We will revisit for the second year. And to get on with actually signing the deed and letting the TN the job so that we can actually assess their performance instead of them spending all their time on the deed. Brian Stockwell 05:43:50.660
Thank you. Amelia Lorentson 05:43:51.850
Is it too late for me to ask another question? Brian Stockwell 05:43:59.470
I put the motion. Those in favour? Councillor Wilson, Wegener and Stockwell. Those Councillor Lorentson, dinzel and Phillips and I use my casting vote to for. The motion is passed. We now move on to the biosecurity plan 2026/2031. Good job, guys. Ben, a quick overview. Thank you. Ben 05:45:02.080
CEO. Firstly, I'll offer an apology for Director Rawlings, who's engaged with the minister for environment in a few of my portfolios this afternoon. The draft new supply biosecurity plan 26-31 has been prepared to guide the coordinated management of invasive plants and animals across Noosa Shire over the next five years. The plan responds to council's obligations under the biosecurity act 2014 and supports the delivery of council's Corporate Plan and Environment Strategy by addressing biosecurity risks to biodiversity, agricultural productivity, community amenity and public safety, the plan has been developed to adopt a risk-based, evidence-informed approach to prioritising invasive species management across all land tenures. It includes actions focused on prevention, early detection and rapid response, containment of established species and community capacity building to support shared responsibilities for biosecurity outcomes. Preparation of the draft has been undertaken with targeted stakeholders including Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, which is biosecurity Queensland, QPWS, parks and wildlife service, Sunshine Coast Council, Gympie Regional Council, SEQ water, catspins, Queensland rail and newsome district landcare group. The biosecurity plan applies the biosecurity act at local levels. And covers roles and responsibilities of Council and other agencies and private landholders. Processes for reporting of invasive species and management processes. Shire-wide risk assessments to establishing priorities for managing invasive species. Reasonable and practical measures through prevention eradication containment and asset based protection depending on the extent of infestation and management feasibility. Methods and timing for management of invasive species. Management tools and support. Regulation and compliance and information capture. The commonwealth scientific and industrial research organisation, which is Australia's peak research organisation, identifies pest plants and animals as the key threat to Australia's biodiversity. Our diverse and comparatively well conserved environmental. Values in Noosa are under particular threat due to our accommodating subtropical climate. Accordingly, the draft Noosa biosecurity plan is a critical tool for us to be able to manage our biodiversity values into the future. I'll say the recommendation that we've put forward is this is a draft that we are seeking Council approval to undertake broad scale community consultation, which should be through GoVocal. We've engaged with relevant stakeholders up to this point. We've been well engaged with land holders through delivery of the current biosecurity plan and so we're seeking the opportunity for all residents of Noosa to be able to have a say. Brian Stockwell 05:48:05.051
Thank you, do we have questions? Moved Someone like to move the motion? Happy to move it. By Councillor Finzel, second Councillor Wilson, Finzel. Karen Finzel 05:48:17.715
Yes, thank you, thanks Ben, that was a really thorough report. Yeah, it was really an interesting read, especially of how we manage our ecosystems and biosecurity and things like feral pigs and all that interesting stuff. So that is really relevant and often we don't think about that when we, you know, we're often like, we think about but I really think, you know, as we head towards those rural areas and also some suburban areas where we have to look at and manage these, the pests and the weeds and the feral animals. I think it's a really good report. I think you've done well to deliver such an informative report such a short time, well I think it's been So I think I do support it, I think we do need to definitely have that in place to be able to you know inform our staff and our broader community of the guidelines that direct our decisions and the use of you know different things that we undertake in the community to address these issues which aren't always pleasant but they're a necessary part. Like finding that balance for people living in this environment so a big thank you to you and all the team actually that have to take these honest day-to responsibilities in your roles because they're not always easy but I think having these policies in line and those frameworks on how to direct that regulate that and implement that is really important so on yeah hopefully by if this gets recommended today that this continues to help inform your work and make those difficult decisions at times in those spaces so thank you. Thanks Councillor, I'll pass that on to our team who are unheralded and often unseen in the work Ben 05:50:12.222
They do and that might be at one o'clock in the morning when most of the students are in bed, they might be out on the job. Amelia Lorentson 05:50:19.002
Yeah, yeah, thank you. I just have a couple of questions Ben. First one's in relation to glyphosate. So currently Council does use glyphosate in its- Biosecurity and lead management programs. There are several councils that are banned or are phasing out glyphosate due to worker health concerns and legal liability following council's lead to the chemical. My question is, has Council assessed its experience? Legal exposure in relation to glyphosate use? And have we looked at alternatives? Ben 05:50:56.681
Look, there's a lot to that question. Brian Stockwell 05:50:59.581
And I'm just, if you could just hold, is there anything in the biosecurity plan that talks about control measures in use of glyphosate? I don't know that off the top of my head. I believe it's a matter that's more specific than what the biosecurity plan covers. Cabas, obviously it's one control obviously, option for weeds, SPEAKER_17 05:51:27.231
And I don't believe it's a relevant question to the item in front of us. Amelia Lorentson 05:51:36.612
Ben, in terms of fire ants, what's the current fire ant situation in relation to Noosa Shire? Ben 05:51:44.812
We don't have known infestations in Noosa Shire. There is a rapid response team from the State government which is tasked at investigating any reported cases. We've certainly had a few queries that have been put through by Noosa Council staff and members of the community as well where the rapid response team has come up and investigated. We don't have any in the Shire at the moment. There are infestations close by, Eumundi conservation reserve is the closest one that we've had, which is, I think it's been deemed under control, although I'll take that as an uncertainty. In terms of. Our protocols going forward, we support the State government in the information that we share with our community members and being able to facilitate an awareness campaign as well. A particular hotspot is our landfill, making sure that we've got the right control mechanisms and that does form part of our monthly assessment, is our biosecurity officer will go through our landfill and look at all the hotspots here again for investigations. Amelia Lorentson 05:52:53.087
And my last question, the report talks about a $30,000 funding gap, so vice the security so, biosecurity risk, without intervention, are rated high to extreme. So, why are we deferring these actions to future budget rather than funding them now? Ben 05:53:16.912
So, it was at the, I think it was the fire ants that yeah, and it's a residual high risk because of the controls that we don't have on it that no one can And that's just the movement of soil, the uncertain vectors that are involved in, you know, it might be a community member, taking a. Log from somewhere to else that might have fire ants on it, or it might be on someone's shoes or deposited in their cars or something like that, so it's a really difficult thing to be able to manage the spread of that, which is why we've still got that as a residual high risk. The additional funding that we've sought for the program. Is above and beyond what we've got at the moment to be able to address some of the emerging issues and compliance items that we've got, so if it hasn't gone through in the budget, it'll go subsequent budgets as a budget request. Tom Wegener 05:54:20.120
I love the various apps that you mentioned, the read scan. App the iNaturalist app, the feral scan app ReadScan SPEAKER_00 05:54:32.870
The weed spotter, all these things are out there that can help us understand what to look for. And then I also really appreciate the various landholder support groups like the urban wildlife garden, land Voluntary Conservation Agreements, Noosa District Landcare, and so on. So we really have a lot of things going on in that field to help the residents Tom Wegener 05:54:55.539
And the citizen science do their thing and complementing them. And again, I really appreciate reaching out to the plan, reach out and depends on that our citizens would to report back to their land, help guide the whole process. So I think it's a wonderful plan and I look forward to the comments coming back. Amelia Lorentson 05:55:18.488
Is my last question and correct me if I'm wrong, but when I looked at the plan there was a list of stakeholders consulted in preparing the giant. I noted that the Biosphere Reserve Foundation wasn't on that list. So my question is, should it be? I just think the alignment in terms of what the biosphere foundation represents advancing values of the UNESCO reserve status. And the plan I see a real alignment. Just asking, were they considered and should they be? Ben 05:56:00.503
I don't think they were considered for this time. We can certainly put it forward for the public consultation, make sure they're aware of it so they can have a feedback into the draft plan if it does go through. The government agencies and groups that we consulted with are either land managers or they've got an area of responsibility where they can. Dictate some of the program. So rather than an advocacy and awareness building process which NBFA, oh sorry, Noosa classic theatre reserve foundation is, the ones that we've targeted are stakeholders with a genuine skin in the game rather than an awareness raising. Which is why we've chosen that. Brian Stockwell 05:56:44.150
Yes, supplementary question there. ULIS Seqwater and SEQ catchments. Think SEQ cashers might be a few years out of date. Yes. Would that be now? Healthy Land and Water? That's correct. Thank you very much, Chair. My pleasure. And I will talk to it. You mentioned CSIRO identifying biosecurity risk as the most significant one to biodiversity in Australia. We've just dealt with the concept of destination management. There's nothing Council does that is more important than actually maintaining our natural areas. But also part of DMP is getting the local food system and the biosecurity plan is one of those ones that spreads across both the environmental and the economic production of our landscape. The risks will continue to grow. As our native vegetation, which is adapted to past climates, has to compete with far more weedy rudder or species, be they animals or plants. I do acknowledge the concern amongst the community and the ongoing debate around this. The use of herbicides to control weed invasion and there is always that balancing act to look at what the outcome would be without herbicides. I know that Noosa district and landcare were consulted. What most people don't know is that group was started to address the biosecurity problem when a whole lot of people started to move into the rural landscape and we had a significant noxious weed called grantil bush that was being aerated. And sprayed by helicopter with a thing that is a mix of 245T and 24D airmine which most people will know as agent orange so that was the genesis of when we had a public meeting in Pomona in '89 or so to start addressing how we can address the management of our landscape in a less toxic and more environmentally friendly way. So it is a big issue and it is one that really is. If we're going to protect the Noosa brand, we have naturalness of our bushland and the productivity of our farmland. So it's an important one that we do consult on and make sure that what we've drafted is in line with community expectations. Cancel launching Councillor Lorentson. Amelia Lorentson 05:59:25.163
I've been attending, I'm not going through ALGA this year, but most of the conferences I think over the last six years both at local and national level and fire that's just a real don't human. Again hear much of it here in Queensland, but when you go to these conferences you actually understand the enormity of the problem. I think biosecurity is one of the most important responsibilities this Council actually carries. And it doesn't get that much attention. Like I said, when I go to the forums, that's when it's really amplified. And as Councillor Stockwell mentioned, when I do Bushcare, volunteering with groups, and when you're there pulling weeds out, invasive weeds, and you're just going, "Man, this is never going to stop, " you actually understand you've got to manage it. Once invasive species take hold, cats cause creepers or fire ants. Know, enter a park, that's it. So we've got to do everything to prevent that from actually happening. So I'm really, you know, this plan exists to prevent that, and I plan coming to community engagement, and again, pass on thanks to your team, really critical, important role that you guys play in ensuring that we're protected. Thanks. Anyone else? Brian Stockwell 06:01:08.630
Councillor Finzel, would you like to close? Karen Finzel 06:01:10.167
I said, looking forward to the feedback from the community so that we get their say in it. But I think it's, really important that we move forward with the biosecurity plan, especially to like future generations by then we get this knowledge and then we like keep building on that. I think that's really important to inform future generations by leaving a really good knowledge base of like our area and what makes it tick in terms of the environment and what we need to protect. So thank you Brian Stockwell 06:01:46.573
Vote. Those in favour? That's unanimous. We move on to the next item which is the anyway, it is the environment and climate change grants. And I'll just skip. Larry Sengstock 06:02:06.561
Vote Ben 06:02:06.841
Those in favour that's unanimous we move on to the next item which is one I put the vote Brian Stockwell 06:02:10.301
Unanimous we move on to the I'm going to declare and that is in accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009 I inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in the matter in terms of environment climate change response grants environmental project grants the on this agenda so I'm the current president of the Noosa Lions Football Club who submitted for the climate grant change application for Although I have a declarable conflict I do not believe a reasonable person could have a perception of bias because the application submitted was unsuccessful and could I add and is not discussed in the report. Therefore I will choose to remain in the meeting room however I respect the decision of the meeting or whether I can remain and participate in the decision. Why? I think because if I don't and people say wait a minute he voted on it but he submitted an application I just think there is a perception of risk so if I if we were successful it would be prescribed but I just think it is a clever one to let people know I applied and we did some lines applied, we didn't get the grant, but I think I can make the decision in the community interest. SPEAKER_17 06:03:51.125
No, it's not there. Amelia Lorentson 06:03:53.305
Please request a new check post. Can I ask a question through the CEO? Is that standard protocol under our Standing Orders? That if there is a prescribed a conflict. And I understand Councillor stockwell's argument that the football club weren't successful, and therefore you're going to be arguing to stay in the meeting, but that's just, I've never seen that happen before, so I'm just seeking advice. Is that standard protocol? Larry Sengstock 06:04:39.070
There's two questions there you've never seen before. Is it standard protocol? It's difficult for me as well. It's not something I've seen either before, Councillor, so. Fact that it is prescribed, if you were, but because it wasn't successful and it's not being discussed here, I think for the purpose of absolute, and it's your decision, Councillor, but I think, you know, my advice would probably be to. Get it out of the room, still? Brian Stockwell 06:05:14.071
It's. An unusual one, isn't it? Yeah. It didn't. But it is vulnerable. Yeah, I know. I just feel I have to. I'm happy to leave if the CEO's advice is that I should leave. Tom Wegener 06:05:27.867
Shall I do that? SPEAKER_17 06:05:28.648
So, in a change, can you describe all the changes you can see, something Brian Stockwell 06:05:35.180
I've already made it. That decoration. Yeah, based on the CDA's serial number. Advice, I will choose to leave the meeting. Thank you. Amelia Lorentson 06:05:49.040
I'm happy to move that Council with me, as soon as the position of Chair, only because they know that you don't like it. We all have to practice, Tom. I'm going to get on this in practice. He doesn't want to practice. Larry Sengstock 06:06:02.783
Thank you very much. Would you like to do it? Yeah. I'm happy to second. Thank you. All in favour? Tom Wegener 06:06:18.016
Okay, Ben, would you please. Give us the report on the climate change response grants? Ben 06:06:26.268
Chair, we've got two funding streams that I'll talk to, and first of all, I'll put in an apology for my colleague, Sian, who's our climate change response coordinator, who. Has just left for a family commitment. So I'll say very early that on the climate change response grants, I might not be able to answer all of your questions, but ones that I don't, I'll take on notice and we can potentially put through to a so we've got two funding streams that are presented in this agenda item. The first one is the environment project grants. Are funded through the Environment Levy and supports the implementation of the noosa's Environment Strategy as well as council's other key environment strategies and plans. The environment grants program is designed to enable collaboration with the community in initiatives that work towards the outcomes and targets identified in the strategy. All initiatives funded under these project grants must have tangible and measurable outcomes. The total budget that we've got for the environmental project grants financial year 26-27 is $35,000. We received nine applications for the current funding round requesting a total of $162,282. The climate change response grants are included under the environment grant policy to assist in the implementation. Plan, the coastal hazards adaptation plan and the regional climate action Roadmap. The current FY26/27 budget for is $50,000 unlike the environment. Project grants, the are funded through general rates. Nine applications were received for the current round of funding for a funding request totalling $145,753. Is noted the calibre of grants received in this round across both streams was very high and it's a our community organisations to be able to put in such well thought and strategic grant all improve the long term future of Noosa. In accordance with the environmental grant guidelines each application both streams was assessed by panel of three officers against the published criteria. The panel assessments then moderated by Director Rawlings with the recommendations presented to the committee in this report. I'll ask you to please note a correction in attachment 2 relating to the climate change response grants. The correction is for the alignment summary column in NICA's get climate ready with Noosa Plan's and should include the following text. The application was scored highly by the evaluation panel. The project addresses increasing risks of climate change impacts on biodiversity and urban green infrastructure as well as helps improve household resilience due to the addition of climate resilience gardens which provide heat, health and flood reduction benefits. The project is thus to help the Noosa community with the climate adaptation and resilience. The project is proposed by a credible group with a demonstrated track record of delivering credible evidence-based information and workshops to the community. The project includes community workshops that demonstrate the broader reach. Recommended conditioning of funding to improve monitoring and evaluation and to demonstrate stronger partnership with consideration for Kabi Kabi Land and Sea Rangers. So that was the additional dot points in such substitution of the dot points that are in there which was cutting and that is my summary, stumbling Thank you. Open for questions? Nicola Wilson 06:10:32.794
Yes please. This may be to the CEO. Through the Chair. Why we voting are on two different types of grants in one recommendation when for the community one we separated them all out? Ben 06:10:53.430
They're both under the same policy and so it's the policy that guides how we assess those grant applications and kerry's shaking her head over there. Kerri Contini 06:11:03.491
I can answer this question. So Through the Chair, the reason that the community project grants divided up into different reports, they are under one policy, however we frequently have multiple Councillors that have to declare a conflict of interest and the past when we had them under one report we ended up with nearly all councillors having to leave the room and we did not have a quorum to be able to vote on the report so we now separate them and I'm hoping that probability and statistics is in our favour and we have enough Councillors for each report to have a quorum. Nicola Wilson 06:11:48.188
Core oral is an administrative function to move the pathway for community grants because so many councils are involved in so many community organisations so on the same theory, Councillor Stockwell doesn't get to vote on the climate change grants because he has a conflict on the environmental ones. Kerri Contini 06:12:12.720
In this format yeah that's Nicola Wilson 06:12:15.080
Correct yeah he wanted to support one type and not the other, you have to vote for both at the same time. Amelia Lorentson 06:12:25.701
So maybe there's a request through the CEO that in future whether the reporting can be done separately given that so far there's only one identified conflict in terms of the environment grants? Larry Sengstock 06:12:39.103
I haven't heard a sense I'm happy to do that. Defer this until we can separate them out for if this makes sense, I think, SPEAKER_17 06:12:49.463
Oh, what is this? Just two. Reports. Ripples. That just means you remember the overall power of the two volts yeah Tom Wegener 06:13:01.986
Okay, so sorry I understand we're going to move to defer this to make a deferral motion. Do to bring this to the Ordinary Meeting? Larry Sengstock 06:13:11.683
Two further reports yeah Tom Wegener 06:13:19.803
So I suspect we no more questions we just do the deferral motion now? Yes. Yeah. Thank you. Okay. Who would, somebody like to move? I'm a Ben 06:13:45.840
Yeah, yeah, it's easy to do, that's no worries, shai's not going to be here. Jessica Phillips 06:13:53.620
Question to the CEO, that will only be for this particular report, but ongoing for future ones, how would it be best? Larry Sengstock 06:14:02.841
Ones, approached? Including future ones, but we'll separate them out. We just don't have this problem before, so I'm not liking. Jessica Phillips 06:14:33.160
Committee agenda item 7.1 will be referred to the Ordinary Meeting for two further reports separating the environment project grants and climate change response grants. Karen Finzel 06:15:00.700
So I just have a question then. Yeah. Does that just previously we said that the policy guides the assessment so if we doing this can we ensure that the assessment process that preceded this is not is that still like effective or is does that affect that in what way or anyway? I don't think it affects it at all. So do we need to make policy changes further down the track or? No it's just administrative. It's just simply a reporting convenience Kerri Contini 06:15:38.918
To enable Councillors to be able to stay in the room for some reports and then only exit when it's a batch of grants that are specifically relating to their conflict. Karen Finzel 06:15:53.661
Okay. Tom Wegener 06:15:57.041
Should we vote on this? All in favour, unanimous? Thank you, we can bring Brian back into the room. Good job. Amelia Lorentson 06:16:13.825
Thank you. It is because he is so comfortable not sharing that you forget how much he's got to get thrown adjournment. Brian Stockwell 06:16:41.420
Okay, we're now up to the next item which is playing apple planning application to sign by delegated authority in April of this year and we have, I forgot the assessment manager, Patrick here to give us a brief overview. Patrick Murphy 06:16:55.023
You, good afternoon councils, I know it's been a long day and you've been waiting for this item. Here am with the delegated report of the decisions that were made for the month of April you know this is a monthly report that's provided for noting detailing the decisions made on the delegation 30 applications decided in no refusals again a broad spread of application a heavy base on minor changes Brian Stockwell 06:17:28.181
Do we have any questions of Patrick does someone want to move the recommendation move by Councillor Wegener. Thank you. Second Councillor Phillips would you like to talk to the motion would anyone else I put the motion all those in favour that's unanimous you'll be more like it thanks, Pat. Patrick our next item is in confidential session it's related to not the public release proposed land rationalisation the under way lot 2 on RP889596 and Noosa Drive lot on RP889596 can I have a resolution that we go into committee to address this item? I'll have it in a second. Thank you. Brian Stockwell 06:31:58.280
Okay, we're back. I'm open to the public and transmitting. I would like to move to Council note the report from the acting property manager to General Committee Meeting dated 9th of June 2026 and a. Authorised strategic executive office to provide landowners land owner's consent if required to enable lodgement of any future development application involving Council owned land affected by the proposed land rationalisation process. B. Note that the provision of land owner's consent and the actions authorised under this resolution do not constitute approval of any development application. Do not bind or fetter Council in its role as assessment manager. Do not commit Council to completing the land exchange and do not authorise any works or transfer of Council land prior to completion of all required approvals, agreements and settlement conditions. Note that the proposed land C. Rights formalisation process is intended to facilitate land tenure outcomes that support implementation of the Noosa Junction framework and character plan, supports opportunities for future housing outcomes consistent with council's Housing Strategy and broad. Planning objectives, will result in no net loss of existing public parking, is intended to improve future access arrangements associated with planned public road connection, and supports increased public realm and green space outcomes within the precinct. And agree D to facilitate a land tenure rationalisation rationalization process involving Council and land located at lot 2 on RP889596 Noosa Heads, including a 363m2 portion of the existing driveway and adjoining land located at 99 Noosa Drive, heads through a market value land exchange whereby squared within block on RP889596 is transferred to the adjoining landowner for amalgamation into the adjoining land and part of is transferred to Council. Pursuant to 2362 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 resolved that the proposed social part of lot 2 on RP889596 proceed other than by tender or auction option in lines on the exception under section 2361 CV 1CV of regulation on the basis that the consideration can compromise the land exchange for land, the disposal is in the public interest and the transaction is otherwise consistent with sound contracting principles. Authorising the Chief Executive Officer to undertake all necessary actions to implement the land rationalisation process including negotiating and entering into agreements, preparing and lodging survey plans, finalising infrastructure agreements, securing easements, access arrangements and road dedication, facilitating title and tenure arrangements, and completing the transfer of land interests. G, note that all costs associated with the land rationalisation process including legal, valuation, surveying, lodgement and stamp duty costs will be funded by proponent and note that any future development application affecting the subject land will be assessed independently under the Planning Act 2016 by the relevant assessment manager and remain separate from the land rationalisation process. Second of Councillor Lorentson, it is a matter of some confluence of course of the commercial nature. I just noticed that it will be funded by the proponent and that we agree. Relax potty. Relates to the party other than Council. Does anyone else wish to discuss the matter? No? I put the motion those in favour. That's unanimous. The motion is carried and that brings us to a close. At 4:38pm. Thank you Councillors for a long but difficult you can leave. Meeting. Related Noosa Council Meetings
← Browse all Noosa Shire Council meeting transcripts
