Council decisions
See the patterns behind Council decisions: who votes together, who seconds motions and which proposals succeed. Browse individual votes in All Votes →
Jump to a chart
Showing General Committee Meeting (2023-06-12 to 2023-06-12).
Voting Records
Named For and Against votes from the official minutes in General Committee Meeting: how councillors vote, together and apart.
Named For/Against divisions became routine practice around 2025. Earlier years show recorded divisions only.
How often each pair of councillors voted the same way in recorded divisions. Shading is scaled to the range shown, deepest green for the most aligned pair through to red for the least. Click any cell for that pair's full division history.
Voting Alignment
Share of each councillor's recorded votes that were on the losing side of the division. A higher share means voting against the eventual decision more often; it is not a measure of merit.
Votes on the Losing Side
Contested Votes
Divisions where at least one councillor voted Against. The full table, every division linked to the meeting and the official minutes, has its own page.
Seconder Pairings
Who seconds whose motions in the official minutes in General Committee Meeting.
Who Seconds Whom
Most Frequent Pairings
Tom Wegener seconded motions moved by JJ Joe Jurisevic (former) ×4- JJ Joe Jurisevic (former) seconded motions moved by
Amelia Lorentson ×3 - CS Clare Stewart (former) seconded motions moved by JJ Joe Jurisevic (former) ×3
- Tom Wegener seconded motions moved by Amelia Lorentson ×2
Karen Finzel seconded motions moved by JJ Joe Jurisevic (former) ×2- Amelia Lorentson seconded motions moved by JJ Joe Jurisevic (former) ×2
Read a row across: how often each other councillor seconded that councillor’s motions. Blank cells: never. Every motion block in the official minutes counts, including amendments and procedural motions, so chairing duty inflates some numbers. A motion needs a seconder before it can be debated, so frequent pairings show who reliably gets whose ideas onto the floor.
Notified Motions
How many notified motions each councillor put on the agenda in General Committee Meeting (items councillors raise themselves, not officer reports).
No notified motions were recorded in this window.
Motions
Which councillors move and second the formal motions recorded in the official minutes in General Committee Meeting, and how they fare.
Moved and Seconded
| Councillor | Moved | Seconded | Carried | Lost | Success as mover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JJJoe Jurisevic (former) | 12 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 100% |
| Amelia Lorentson | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 80% |
 Brian Stockwell | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100% |
| Tom Wegener | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 100% |
| CSClare Stewart (former) | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 100% |
| Karen Finzel | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 100% |
 Frank Wilkie | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | – |
27 motions recorded: 25 carried, 1 lost, 0 withdrawn, 0 lapsed, 1 superseded by amendment. 24 were unanimous.
The chair moves many procedural motions (adoption of minutes, moving between sessions), which inflates the mayoral count. The same honesty rule as speaking time applies.
Conflicts of Interest →
COI Declarations per Councillor
Brian Stockwell5 matters declared5 records in the minutesKaren Finzel3 matters declared3 records in the minutesAmelia Lorentson2 matters declared2 records in the minutesCSClare Stewart2 matters declared2 records in the minutesFrank Wilkie1 matter declared1 records in the minutesJJJoe Jurisevic0 matters declaredTom Wegener0 matters declaredFull register: every declaration, verbatim →
Extracted automatically from the official council minutes, the statutory record under the Local Government Act 2009 (Qld) s150FA. Extraction can miss or mis-parse entries. Each entry links to the official minutes; verify against the source. Declaring a conflict is the process working, not an accusation.
Transparency
Closed sessions, petitions and deputations recorded in the official minutes in General Committee Meeting.
About This Data
Every number on this page is computed from three sources, each used for what it is authoritative about, and every number is at most one click from the public record it came from.
- Meeting transcripts feed speaking time, contributions, phrase counts and topics. Transcription and speaker attribution are machine-assisted and can be wrong. Speaking time includes chairing, which inflates the chair's share.
- Meeting headers (the published attendance record) feed attendance, apologies and chairing. These are structured facts, not transcript inference.
- Official minutes (the statutory record) feed motions, named division votes, conflict-of-interest declarations and transparency counters. Extraction is automated against the statutory wording and can miss or mis-parse entries; each extracted record links to the official minutes so it can be verified at the source.
A phrase count is not a formal declaration or ruling. A conflict-of-interest declaration is the transparency process working, not an accusation. Motion and voting figures count what the minutes record; named For/Against divisions became routine practice around 2025, so earlier years understate division detail.
A notified motion is an item a councillor puts on the agenda themselves. These are counted from the minutes' "Notified Motions" section, one per agenda item, credited to the councillor who moved it. Amendments and restatements of the same item are not counted again, and a conflict-of-interest determination on the item is not treated as authorship. A notice withdrawn before it was moved is recorded in the minutes but is not attributed here, because the withdrawal line is narrative rather than a structured record.
Figures for this view cover 2023-06-12 to 2023-06-12.