Original source · versioned page text
2017-12-12 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Page 28 of 79
NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet - Final Evaluation
souls
Maintenance/Assistance
NAME OF TENDERER HOURLY RATE . .
Steel Fabrication
(Conforming Tenders Only) (excl of GST)
1 [AJ Steel 45 % Mark Up | S85 J45% Mark up
2 [Studio Steel No Mark Up |} ————————___«S85]No Mark up
3 [Sunrise Hills 20% Mark Up 20% Mark up
Bp
ST
6
Dp
Bp
ST
MO
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS
1 2 3
PART A - Non price elements AJ Steel 45 % Mark Up eucie) “ Ro cre nrise ", ce
Resultant Resultant Resultant
Evaluation Criteria Weighting (%) score x Score score x score x
weighting weighting weighting
Resourcing
a
Normalised Technical Score (Tn)
PART B - Price element AJ Steel 45 % Mark Up rude “ cor | Sune “ oe rid
Total Fees (Pc) 35% $85 $85 $90
Average Fees (Pav) $.....ccsssssscesseeeeee $87
Price Score 102 102 96
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 100 100 94
Weighted Price Score (Pw)
Total Score of price and non price elements
The Contract Administrator confirms the above scores
Contract Administrator & Assesment Panel Member 1 Building and Facilities Co-ordinator and weightings of this evaluation
Assesment Panel Member 2 Facility Officer
Assesment Panel Member 3 Contract Administrator's signature: Building and Facilities Co-ordinator
Assesment Panel Member 4 Workplace Health and Safety Advisor (1)
Assesment Panel Member 5 Workplace Health and Safety Advisor (2)
Page 28 of 79See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.