Council archive · source document
Request for Further Information - 010.2008.00000026.001 [As Published] · 132008.26
Duncan Thompson, 07 5449 5175
Email: [email protected]
Application Ref: 2008/26
30 January 2008
Tim Ditchfield
Middap Ditchfield Architects
Cnr Mary & Thomas Streets
NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566
Dear Tim,
Re: Application for a Development Permit for 08/0026 Detached House situated
at 52 Noosa Parade NOOSA HEADS described as LOT: 257 N: 21858
I refer to the above application and wish to advise that following preliminary
examination of the plans it has been determined that the proposal does not meet
Acceptable Solutions S1.1, S8.1 and S8.2 of the Detached House Code with respect to
setbacks, site cover and landscaping.
The following information is therefore required to be submitted:-
1. Amended plans and/or supporting information that demonstrate that the proposal
meets Specific Outcome O1 or Probable Solution S1.1 of the Detached House
Code described below.
column 1 column 2
Specific Outcomes Acceptable solutions (if self-assessable)
Probable solutions (if code assessable)
14.65 Siting
Setbacks
S1.1 The minimum setback of the Detached
O1 Buildings and other structures are
house or dwelling unit and associated buildings
appropriately designed and sited to-
and structures from boundaries is not less than
the minimum specified in Schedule 1; or
a) provide amenity for users of the premises as
S1.2 Where there is a conflict between
well as preserve the visual and acoustic privacy
boundary setbacks in Schedule 1, the greater of
of adjoining and nearby land uses;
the setbacks prevails;
b) preserve any existing vegetation that will
buffer the proposed building from adjoining
AND
uses;
c) allow for landscaping to be provided between
S1.3 If there are no applicable setbacks shown
buildings; and
in Schedule 1, the siting provisions of Part 11 or
d) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of
12 of the Queensland Development Code apply.
buildings and landscape elements within the
street.
SBR alternative provision to QDC Parts 11
SBR alternative provision to QDC Parts 11 and 12, A1, A2 and A7
and 12, P1, P2 and P7
Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach
Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
As the property is affected by the Natural Hazards Overlay with Coastal
Protection Area the minimum setbacks described in Table 1-2 of Schedule 1 may
apply.
Table 1-2 Exceptions for Specific Premesis
Column 1 Column 2
Minimum Setbacks
Premises in Coastal Protection Precinct– other If in the Detached Housing, Semi Attached
than Eastern Beaches Locality Housing, Attached Housing, Village Mix or
Neighbourhood Centre Zone, buildings are
setback not less than 10m from mean high
water mark;
If in any other zone–
a) where there is an existing building located
within an erosion prone area on the site,
extensions to the building are not situated closer
to the watercourse than the existing building,
but not less than 10m from mean high water
mark; or
b) where there is no existing building located
within an erosion prone area on the site–40m
from mean high water mark.
2. Amended plans and/or supporting information that demonstrate that the proposal
meets Specific Outcome O8 and/or Probable Solutions S8.1 and S8.2 of the
Detached House Code described below.
column 1 column 2
Specific Outcomes Acceptable solutions (if self-assessable)
Probable solutions (if code assessable)
Site cover
S8.1 With the exception of Ancillary Dwelling
O8 The site cover of buildings and other roofed
Units, the site cover of class 1 and class 10
structures-
buildings and other roofed structures does not
exceed 50% for a single storey building and
a) is of a scale that is compatible with
40% for a building of 2 or more storeys
surrounding development;
b) does not present an appearance of bulk to
SBR alternative provision to QDC Parts 11
adjacent properties, roads or other areas in the
and 12, A3
vicinity of the site;
c) maximises the retention of existing vegetation
and allows for additional soft landscaping AND
S8.2 If in the Eastern Beaches, Noosaville,
between buildings;
Noosa Heads or Noosa North Shore Locality
d) allows for adequate area at ground level for
and in the Detached Housing or Semi-attached
outdoor recreation, entertainment, clothes
Housing Zone-soft landscaping is provided and
drying and other site facilities; and
retained over a minimum of 20% of site area.
e) facilitates on-site stormwater management
and vehicular access.
SBR alternative provision to QDC Parts 11
and 12, P3
The Noosa Plan states that site cover means the proportion of a site covered by
all buildings and structures roofed with impervious materials, shown as a
percentage. For enclosed spaces this includes the area within the outside wall
and for unenclosed spaces this includes the area measured along a line 600mm
in from the perimeter of the roof.
Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach
Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention
Page 3
Amendments to the Noosa Plan accept site cover for a building of 2 or more
storeys of 50% on the ground floor and 30% for the upper storey(s) or 40% for all
storeys. Calculations based on the Noosa Plan’s description of site cover suggest
that the proposal exceeds the limit of allowable site cover.
The Noosa Plan states that soft landscaping means trees, shrubs, grass,
garden beds and impervious surfaces that occur naturally such as rock outcrops.
Soft landscaping is not located on top of a constructed slab or other structure and
is capable of supporting the establishment and growth of canopy trees as well as
other species. The term does not include swimming pools or impervious surfaces
such as driveways, vehicular access lanes, vehicle parking and manoeuvring
areas, pathways, stormwater structures, tennis courts, balconies, roof terraces
and the like.
Calculations based on the Noosa Plan’s description of soft landscaping suggest
that the proposal does not meet the requirement for soft landscaping described in
S8.2.
Please provide four copies of all information that you are providing. In addition, it
would assist Council if you could also provide an electronic copy of your response.
Please be aware that under Section 3.2.12 of the Integrated Planning Act, the applicant
is to respond to any information request within 12 months of the request or otherwise,
the application lapses.
Under the provisions of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, you as the applicant, have
three options available in response to this Information Request. You may give the
assessment manager (in this instance Council) and each referral agency (if any):-
1. all of the information requested; or
2. part of the information requested together with a letter asking the assessment
manager and each referral agency to proceed with the assessment of the
application; or
3. a letter:-
3.1. stating that you do not intend to supply any of the information requested;
and
3.2. asking the assessment manager and each referral agency to proceed with
the assessment of the application.
The above information is required to be submitted, prior to assessment of the
application. If any further matters arise as part of assessment of this application, you
will be advised accordingly.
Should you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to
contact Duncan Thompson on the above number.
Yours faithfully,
Daniel Smith
ASSISTANT PLANNING OFFICER
Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach
Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention
Page 4
Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention [OCR of page images] Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention
Used in these records
Request for Further Information - 010.2008.00000026.001 [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 18 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.