Council archive · source document
RFI - Appendix 2 - Caravan Parks v Rockhampton Regional Council Anor 2018 QPEC 52 · MCU19/0117
26
“UPON THE COURT BEING SATISFIED THAT a development offence
has been committed, namely a contravention of section 165(a) of the
Planning Act 2016
It is ordered pursuant to section 180(3) of the Planning Act 2016 that:
1. By 4pm on 15 February 2019, the First Respondent, and its agents
servants and contractors, cease the use of land formally described as
Lot 230 on SP143262 and Lot 1 on RP619483 (the Land) for the
purposes of a Tourist Park as defined in the Rockhampton Regional
Planning Scheme 2015;
2. Upon compliance with paragraph 1, the First Respondent, and its
agents, servants and contractors, not resume the use of the Land for
the purposes of a Tourist park as defined in the Rockhampton
Regional Planning Scheme 2015 in the absence of an effective
development permit authorising the making of a material change of
use;
3. By 4pm on 15 February 2019, the First Respondent is to:
(a) remove signage from the Land identifying that it may be used
for the purposes of a Tourist park as defined in the
Rockhampton Regional Planning Scheme 2015;
(b) notify, in writing, the Campervan & Motorhome Club of
Australia Limited that the existing use of the Land for the
purposes of overnight camping by occupants and visitors in
recreational vehicles, campervans, caravans and tents is not
a lawful use of the Land and has ceased;
(c) publish public notices which advise that the use of the Land
for the purposes of a Tourist Park as defined in the
Rockhampton Regional Planning Scheme 2015 is not
permitted on the Land in the following ways:
(i) in at least one newspaper that circulates generally in
the First Respondent’s local government area;
(ii) in a prominent location on the First Respondent’s
website; and
(iii) on the noticeboard of the First Respondent’s public
office in Bolsover Street, Rockhampton.”
[129] The enforcement orders do not include a requirement for the land to be restored to the
condition it was in prior to the commission of the development offence. Nor do the
orders require signage to be erected advising the RV accommodation use is unlawful.
I was not satisfied that either of these orders should be made. The development
offence will, in my view, be addressed by a combination of compliance with the
injunctive orders (paragraphs 1 and 2), coupled with compliance with the order
requiring the removal of signage that indicates the use is a lawful use of the land.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
RFI - Appendix 2 - Caravan Parks v Rockhampton Regional Council Anor 2018 QPEC 52.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 382 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.