GIA application and Court Judgement Part 1 of 2 132006.268..02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

| GILBERT+SUTHERLAND,
\ 5) Effluent treatment data obtained from Appendix 4.20 of
system and land
: . Table 5.1.1 lists the wastewater generating
application area activities at the redeveloped site during the
{ This Conceptual Effluent Treatment and peak summer period when the facility is
Disposal Strategy was conducted using a fully staffed (48 persons).
[ combination of new data and data taken
from the previous site investigation Table 5.1.1 Proposed wastewater volumes
[ undertaken by Global Testing in 2007. Source Volume | Number | Volume
er of of waste-
The proposed treatment and application person people water
i methods to be employed on-site are based on iw (Uday)
the following guidelines and authorities: On-site 180 5 ‘900
{ « the ‘Queensland Plumbing and residence
Wastewater Code, 2006’ Dual flush | 27.5 48 7,320
{ © ASINZS 1$47:2000 ‘On-site Domestic toilet*
Wastewater Management’ § Hand a 48 384
| . Planning Guidelines for Water Supply and washing**
: awerage Kitchen 5 48 240
. ¢ Queensland Water Recycling Guidelines, Misc. 10 48 480
| 2005” TOTAL 3,324
. . oye * Assumes 11/5.5 dual flush cistern, with 7 full
Based on previous testing detailed in “
L. Section 3 of this report and the proposed fiyshand 3 halt fusbes per peren per day.
i site use, it is proposed that the most sumes 4 x ol washes per day.
effective and flexible method of irrigating . . a
treated wastewater for the site would be For the on-site residence it is assumed that
{ via surface sprinkler it will be a permanent 5 person household
. connected to a bore water supply (i.e.
| In calculating a suitable disposal area for 180L/person/day),
the predicted wastewater loadings, the site . | _ .
was assigned a conservative permeability of For the bottling facility and administration
I 0,22méday in accordance with Category 5 block, the above loadings assume a total of
soils as detailed in Table 4,2Ad of AS/NZS 50.5L/person/day. This is in line with the
{ . 1547:2000. A conservative proposed loadings for industrial use (50L per person}
irrigation area for the expected effluent from AS1547:2000, —-
[ loadings was therefore calculated , wee
incorporating the recommended design 5.2 Bottling facility wash down
irrigation rate {OIR) of 20 mm/week for a in addition t
l . 0 the above tabled wastewater
. Seay eo) thie ee aniea ea of ASINZS generation projections there is a volume of
{ . eta NH aection 5.4. water used on a weekly basis to hose down

. the internal shed floors. This is performed
5.1 Wastewater loadings on A pene

 

lL once a week using a pressure cleaner to
The following proposed wastewater conserve water and expedite the task,
loadings are based on interviews with . . .
L. Cocroy Mountain Spring Water staff and This water is currently collected in a
connected series of concrete drains
I embedded in the shed floor. it is proposed
“= that these will drain to a central
{ S 5 standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, 2000, underground sump equipped with a pump
th ASINZS 1547:2000 On-site domestic wastewater and float switch to enable the contained
7 Management, waters to be pumped to the effluent
} a 5 Department of Natural Resources & Mines, 2005, disposal system as the sump level requires.
c Planning Guidelines for Water Supply and Sewerage.
a Chapter 5 - DemandiFlow and Projections - Table A. . :
? Queensland Government, Environmental Protection Assuming that the pressure cleaner uses
Agency, 2005, WaterWise Queensland. Queensland 600L per hour and the wash down takes
Water Recycling Guidelines 2005, half an hour, it is estimated that the

5-1