Original source · versioned page text
2022-11-04 - Special Meeting Agenda Item 1 - Attachment 2 - Consultation Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
5.8 Community survey – areas of Noosa Shire less suitable for social
and affordable housing Q8. Top 10 locations identified as less suitable
Sunrise Beach 10
Question 8: Are there parts of Noosa Shire that are less suitable for social and
Rural areas 11
affordable housing, why?
Sunshine Beach 14
Of the 667 people who took part in the survey, 429 provided a response to this Hastin gs St 16
question. Coastal suburbs 16
Noosaville 17
Participants were asked to identify areas in the Noosa Shire they thought would Whole Noosa Shire 21
be less suitable for social and affordable housing. Noosa Heads 26
Hinterland 26
This was an open-ended question allowing those who responded to detail
Bu sh land / Conservation land / Green space 29
specific locations they thought would be unsuitable for social and affordable
housing and detail their reasons why. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Findings: Q8. Why are these areas less suitable for social and affordable housing?
• An analysis of the responses found most people did not believe it would be Lack of infrastructure and facilities (public
appropriate for social and affordable housing to be built on land that is transport, accessability, service centres,
currently designated bushland, conservation land or green space. employment, h ealth and educational facilities)
15.7%
Impact to environment/ animals
• This was closely followed by areas in the Hinterland and Noosa Heads which 25.5%
received equal support as areas less suitable for social and affordable
housing. Already overpopulated/ congested
11.6%
• As the community that contributed the largest response to the engagement,
it could be assumed from the overall analysis that Noosa Heads residents
Areas prone to flooding/ fires/natural disasters
are united in their view that there should be no new social or affordable
housing development considered for land on Leslie Drive. 15.0%
17.6% Commercial/Business/Tourist areas
• A detailed list of areas identified by respondents as not suitable for social
and affordable housing is included in the Appendix. 2.2% 12.4%
Too expensive for majority of people to
live/provide affordable housing
45 Will impact on character of area/property value
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.