Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

PM Submission Object - Robyn Woodall - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 4

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 15) This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those who
                 choose this relaxed pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It
                 delivers instead, undesirable urban density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with
                 Peregian’s much sought after relaxed village character & community engagement.

                 16) I am also concerned that there are implications for the neighbouring properties in
                 relation to potential future noise complaints. The adjoining Kindergarten has a wonderful
                 history of play-based activity, many of which occur outdoors. This can often be boisterous
                 and noisy. Future owners of properties along the northern boundary may not be willing to
                 take the noise-abatement steps proposed by the developers – specifically keeping the
                 windows/doors closed & air conditioners running if affected. (A similar situation applies for
                 the hotel drive-through.) The proposed development means the existing fence will not
                 abate any noise, which wasn’t an issue with the land when it was a caravan park. I fear that
                 future complaints may have negative implications on the operation of the Kindy’s programs.

                 17) Perusal of the latest version of the DA shows that the applicant did not tick the box
                 (Item 7) indicating that there is a watercourse in the site. There is a watercourse on the site
                 and this is plainly misleading. Noosa Council must clarify why the applicant did not indicate
                 the true situation and cannot grant approval for the DA until this question has been
                 answered and the implications of the fact that there is a watercourse have been fully
                 resolved. The DA covers a site that abuts directly onto a Noosa National Parks National Park
                 and this is a serious issue.



                 I urge Noosa Council to protect the village of Peregian Beach & to refuse this DA.

                 Signed,

                 Robyn Woodall

                 Robyn Woodall
                 121 Lorikeet Drive,
                 Peregian Beach




                                                               -3-
Document Set ID: 20319547
Version: 1, Version Date: 08/05/2017
Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Robyn Woodall - MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 155 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.