Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Council archive · source document

Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132007.2399

of 22

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

1.1 Written details and or plans as appropriate detailing any safety measures proposed
between the lots and the lakes for residents (ie drowning of young children)


It is noted that four (4) of the proposed Lots of Precinct J are adjacent to one of the lakes
that form part of the golf course. An assessment of the safety risks has been undertaken
and a summary follows:


Design Characteristics
     ƒ     The boundaries of the lots are a number of metres from the edge of the lake.
     ƒ     A masonry retaining wall is proposed to be situated on the residential lot
           boundary.
     ƒ     A bank slopes from the proposed lot boundary, in each case, to the lake edge.
     ƒ     The bank continues into the lake at a slope of 1: 2.5.
     ƒ     The bank will be planted primarily with native vegetation, which is generally not
           conducive for play by children. For instance, it is not lawn which may be more
           appealing to children.




                   Figure 1 ‐ Indicative relationship between the Noosa Springs lake and a residence




Response to Information Request (Noosa Springs – Precinct J)                                           Page 3 of 14


[OCR of page images]
 

1.1 Written details and or plans as appropriate detailing any safety measures proposed
between the lots and the lakes for residents (ie drowning of young children)

It is noted that four (4) of the proposed Lots of Precinct J are adjacent to one of the lakes
that form part of the golf course. An assessment of the safety risks has been undertaken
and a summary follows:

Design Characteristics
= The boundaries of the lots are a number of metres from the edge of the lake.

= Amasonry retaining wall is proposed to be situated on the residential lot
boundary.

= Abank slopes from the proposed lot boundary, in each case, to the lake edge.
= The bank continues into the lake at a slope of 1: 2.5.

= The bank will be planted primarily with native vegetation, which is generally not
conducive for play by children. For instance, it is not lawn which may be more
appealing to children.

i l I
Lake | Bank | | Building setback

(non recreational) , x ) from rear boundary

 

Figure 1 - Indicative relationship between the Noosa Springs lake and a residence

 

Response to Information Request (Noosa Springs - Precinct J) Page 3 of 14

Used in these records

About this file

File size
5.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 5.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.