Original source · versioned page text
Request to Change Existing Approval
3.0 COMPLIANCE WITH DEFINITION OF ‘MINOR CHANGE’ (SCHEDULE 2 OF PA 2016)
Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016 provides a definition of a ‘minor change’, which contains a series of criteria
to determine what constitutes a ‘minor change’ to an approval detailed as follows:
minor change means a change that—
(b) for a development approval—
(i) would not result in substantially different development; and
(ii) if a development application for the development, including the change, were made when the
change application is made would not cause—
(A) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
(B) referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, if there were no referral
agencies for the development application; or
(C) referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or
(D) a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard to, matters prescribed by
regulation under section 55(2), other than matters the referral agency must have assessed the
application against, or have had regard to, when the application was made; or
(E) public notification if public notification was not required for the development application.
An assessment of the proposed change with reference to the above criteria is provided as follows:
(i) (The change) would not result in a substantially different development
When determining what constitutes a substantially different development, Schedule 1: Substantially Different
Development of the Development Assessment Rules applies. Schedule 1 provides a list of criteria that may
constitute a substantially different development as follows:
➢ Involves a new use; or
➢ Results in the application applying to a new parcel of land; or
➢ Dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance; or
➢ Changes the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended; or
➢ Removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development; or
➢ Significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as increasing traffic to the site;
or
➢ Introduces new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts; or
➢ Removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced a negative impact of the
development; or
➢ Impacts on infrastructure provisions.
An assessment is provided as follows:
Involves a new use
The ‘proposed change’ seeks to amend the approved staging plan to reflect the inclusion of another stage (2B)
involving the subdivision of proposed Lots 7 & 8.
Results in the application applying to a new parcel of land
The ‘proposed change’ does not involve a new parcel of land.
Dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance
The proposed development does not propose any built form. As such, he ‘proposed change’ will not drastically
change built form.
Changes the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended
The ‘proposed change’ does not impact the approved development’s ability to operate as intended.
2
Request to Change an Existing Approval August 2021
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.