Original source · versioned page text
PM Submission Object - Max & Margaret Thomson MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
Accommodation Type 2, and therefore is not consistent with the
Open Space Recreation Zone and therefore is not consistent with
performance outcome O74;
o The proposed development does not protect the Peregian Beach
caravan park site for low cost visitor accommodation and
therefore is not consistent with performance outcome O75;
o Visitor Accommodation Type 4 is being proposed on the land, but
is not integrated as part of a caravan park use or other form of
budget accommodation and therefore is not consistent with
performance outcome O76;
o The proposed development will result in significant traffic
generation that will affect nearby uses and is not consistent with
performance outcome O77;
o The proposed buildings and structures are not designed and sited
to be attractive, comfortable and accessible to the public or
provide suitable landscape treatments and amenities, conducive to
community interaction and convenience and public safety and
therefore is not consistent with performance outcome O78;
The proposed development is not consistent with the reasonable
expectations of residents in the locality, given the Peregian Beach Caravan
site is to primarily provide for budget visitor accommodation, which is in
the public interest;
There are no grounds provided that are sufficient to overcome the level of
conflict identified with the Noosa Plan.
For all of the above reasons I/we urgesCouncil to refuse this DA.
Max & Margaret Thomson
Document Set ID: 20306903
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.