Council archive · source document
08/0310 - MCU - Wellbeing Type 2 - Social [As Published] · 132008.310
INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007 CI] No Ifno, is any ERA an item 20 ERA (extracting rock or other material) intended to be located outside waters? (1 No - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the fand, and the application is accompanied by an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse fo receive it. (Complete Part G) This application requires assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Wild Rivers Act 20085. if the ‘Administering Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. C) Yes tfyes, does the ERA meat the following? © the activity is located Inside a flood management area and a (No [1] Yes borrow pit of not more than 10,000m! for - . + — specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005; or + residential complexes, as defined under the Environmental Protection Act 1994 the activity is located outside a flood management area [CINo (1 Yes If yes to either - Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the tand, and the application is accompanied by an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it. (Complete Part G) This application requires assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and, subject to the relevant declaration for the wild river area, the Wild Rivers Act 2005. If the Administering Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. Ino to both - An application for the ERA would be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment manager must refuse to receive it IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 2, item 1 IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 5. items 3 and 4 IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2, items 1 and 23 Environmental Protection Act 1994, section 73AA (wild river area) Wild Rivers Act 2006, section 43A WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A PORT 14 Is any part of the premises within the limits of a port under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994? (0 No OC Yes If yes, is that part of the premises below high water mark? C) No LJ Yes - ifanswers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule 8 - Answer (a) to (c) below. This application requires assessment by the Port Authority for the land. If you answer no to (a), () and (c) below, the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Agency. (a) [s any part of the proposal within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shipping corridor for the Port? CO) No (1 Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. (b) Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wharf, a mooring, anchorage or spoil grounds? C] No Ld Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. (c) _ 's any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in a land use plan? (0 No (1 Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency. IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2. items 15 and 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/0310 - MCU - Wellbeing Type 2 - Social [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.