Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

08/0310 - MCU - Wellbeing Type 2 - Social [As Published] · 132008.310

of 89

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007,

 

VEGETATION CLEARING; KOALA CONSERVATION; WILD RIVER AREA

 

43

Is any of the proposed operational work for the clearing of native vegetation to which the Vegetation Management Act 1999
applies?
(I No
(J Yes
If yes, is the proposed clearing assessable (i.e. not an exception) under schedule 8, part 1, table 4 of the IPA?
OO No
OO Yes

If yes, is the proposed vegetation clearing a relevant purpose under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, section
22A for one or more of the following?

(a) A project declared to be a significant project under the State Development and Public []No (] Yes
Works Organisation Act 1971, section 26

(b) Necessary to control non-native plants or declared pest CINo [J Yes
(c) To ensure public safety [No (1 Yes

(d) For establishing a necessary fence, firebreak, road or vehicle track, or for constructing C]No [_] Yes
necessary built infrastructure, if there is no suitable altemative site for the fence,
firebreak, road, track or infrastructure

{e) Anatural and ordinary consequence of other assessable development for which a (No [1 Yes
development approval as defined under the Planning Act was given, or a development
application as defined under the Planning Act was made, before 16 May 2003

 

 

 

 

(f} For fodder harvesting LINo (1) Yes

(g) For thinning CJNo {1 Yes

(h) Fer clearing of encroachment Cino (Yes

(i) For an extractive industry LINo {1 Yes

(j) For clearing regrowth on leases issued under the Land Act 1994 for agriculture or LINo [J Yes
grazing p purposes. _ _

(Kk) For clearing regrowth on freehold land, or indigenous land, in a wild river high CINo (1 Yes
preservation area.

If no to all — the clearing is not a relevant purpose and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive the application.

\f yes to any one, is the proposed clearing associated with a material change of use or reconfiguring a lot for which
referral is required in relation to clearing vegetation {ie. did you answer ‘yes’ fo all questions in either Q2.1.4 or Q 3.3)?
LI Yes
(J No—Answer (a) (b) and (c) below.
Unless the advice provided below {in relation to all elements of the proposed clearing) is “The clearing is not a
relevant purpose and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive the application" - Complete Part J. This
application requires assessment by the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW). If NRW is not the
Assessment Manager, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

(a) Is any of the proposed clearing in an area declared as an area of high nature conservation value (other
than a wild river declared area) or an area vulnerable to land degradation under the Vegetation
Management Act 1999?

(1 No

(0 Yes
If yes, is any of the proposed clearing for (e), (f}, (i) or (j) above?
CI No

LO Yes- The clearing is not a relevant purpose and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive the

 

application

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
4.2 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_0310 - MCU - Wellbeing Type 2 - Social [As Published].pdf · 4.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.