Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

RFI - Attachment D - Geotechnical Investigation Report · MCU25/0053

of 47

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Page                        : 2 of 6
Work Order                  : EB2503423
Client                      : PTG Consulting Pty Ltd
Project                     : PTG/01608 7 Noosa Pde

General Comments
The analytical procedures used by ALS have been developed from established internationally recognised procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM.                                       In house developed procedures
are fully validated and are often at the client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing
purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contract for details.

Key :          CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
               LOR = Limit of reporting
               ^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
               ø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.
               ~ = Indicates an estimated value.
l   ASS: EA033 (CRS Suite): Analysis is performed as per the Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines (2004) and the updated National Acid Sulfate Soils Guidance: National acid sulfate soils identification
    and laboratory methods manual, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra, ACT (2018)
l   ASS: EA033 (CRS Suite):Retained Acidity not required because pH KCl greater than or equal to 4.5
l   ASS: EA033 (CRS Suite): Laboratory determinations of ANC needs to be corroborated by effectiveness of the measured ANC in relation to incubation ANC. Unless corroborated, the results of ANC testing should
    be discounted when determining Net Acidity for comparison with action criteria, or for the determination of the acidity hazard and required liming amounts.
l   ASS: EA033 (CRS Suite): Liming rate is calculated and reported on a dry weight basis assuming use of fine agricultural lime (CaCO3) and using a safety factor of 1.5 to allow for non-homogeneous mixing and
    poor reactivity of lime. For conversion of Liming Rate from 'kg/t dry weight' to 'kg/m3 in-situ soil', multiply 'reported results' x 'wet bulk density of soil in t/m3'.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
5.3 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

RFI - Attachment D - Geotechnical Investigation Report.pdf · 5.3 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.