Properly made submission (object) Peregian Beach Business Association MCU13/0092

       Submission to MCU 13/0092                                                               August 15, 2013



    24. The proposed shopping centre does not fit the Peregian Beach character which states development is
        in keeping with the surrounding streetscape and landscape qualities. The construction of a building that
        has a 50 metre        long wall and incorporates 2.5 to 3.5 metre high noise barriers is not a desirable
        solution and does not fit in with the natural beachside character desired for the area.


    25. Limited landscaping is provided across the site which will result in an urban form that lacks the
        Peregian character of small scale buildings within a landscaped setting.


    26. The applicant has not demonstrated that there is a critical need for the location of the use on the site.




In summary, we request that          Development Application    MCU13/0092 be refused for the above         reasons

summarised as the following:


             a.     The proposal does not comply with the Noosa Plan.


             b.     The applicant has not demonstrated that there is a need for the use to be located in the Open
                    Space Recreation zone.

             c.     The proposal is inconsistent with the Sunshine Coast Sport and Active Recreation Plan which
                    clearly demonstrates a shortage of open space for recreational purposes.

             d.     The   proposal will result in the duplication of the existing neighbourhood centre which will
                    undermine the character and vision for the area and severely impact the sustainability of the
                    current Village precinct.


             e.     The applicant’s economic report is flawed and does not demonstrate an overriding need for the
                    shopping complex as there is appropriately zoned and approved land in the locality that could
                    cater for an appropriately sized supermarket to meet the demands of the locality.


             f.     The applicant has not demonstrated that an approval should be granted despite the conflicts
                    with the Planning Scheme.


             g.     The proposal will detrimentally impact on the surrounding residential areas by means of noise
                    and additional traffic which cannot be adequately controlled by any conditions of approval.


             h.     Approval of the proposed use will detrimentally affect the amenity and character of the
                    intended recreational and community area and its surrounding residents.




Yours faithfully,




 o    Siljuk
Secretary
Peregian Beach Business Association Inc




                                                     Page 5 of 5