Council archive · source document
240920 - 33 Ross Crescent RFI Response · MCU24/0094
DEVELOPMENT 35m wide eastern frontage
setback ~90m from visible height on beach
RESPONSE | PO8
The proposal satisfies PO8(a) as the proposed
development and is designed to be compatible with the
scale of surrounding development and the unique
highly d
circumstances of the site. Given the expansive nature of
the lot, the size of the dwelling is appropriate and maintains
ense exi
a harmonious relationship with neighboring properties.
sting ve
The proposal satisfies PO8(b) as the development
Alison Park's heavily vegetated area
prioritises a low site impact to maximise the retention of
existing site characteristics, including native vegetation
getation
and natural landforms. The careful placement of the
building minimises disruption to the landscape and allows 1
buffer
for the preservation of important ecological features. The
proposed development preserves the existing vegetation
and relocates where possible. Identified trees have been
retained and indigenous planting species remain in place 22m vegetation buffer
that contribute to screening and visually softening the 2
development. These natural elements have been retained
and or relocated within the site to provide natural buffering 3
and enhance the visual continuity between the built
environment and the surrounding landscape.
1) 1.5m wide supporting structural wall (minimal visual impact)
The proposal satisfies PO8(c) by incorporating large areas
of soft landscaping within, ontop and around the dwelling,
2) 18m deck screened below surrounding existing vegetation height not visible from the beach
by promoting a seamless integration with the environment.
The proposal not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of the
surroundings but also supports local biodiversity and 3) 62m property boundary to east
contributes to the overall green space of the area.
The proposal satisfies PO8(d) as the development
incorporates a strategy of stepping down with the natural
slope, thereby minimising the apperance of any bulk form
seen from adjacent properties, roads or other areas in the
vicinity of the site. The developments architectural
features, landscaping, and stepped building heights,
integrates harmoniously with the surrounding environment.
This approach enhances the visual aesthetics of the area
while maintaining a scale that is consistent with
neighboring structures. Overall, the development promotes
a sense of openness and contributes positively to the
character of the neighborhood.
birds eye view - study 02
ARTISTIC IMPRESSIONS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY - REFER DRAWINGS FOR DETAIL. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWN REV DATE ISSUE PROJECT CLIENT DRAWING NAME PHASE DWG NO REV PROJECT NO 0427
33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family site study SD 110.03 SCALE As
indicated
Sunshine Beach Trust
A3
birds eye view study
RFI schematic design
1:1 @
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
[OCR of page images]
i: 35m wide eastern frontages
setback ~90m from visible height on beach {Ua
\ EE I aS] ae
(the proposal satisfies PO8(a) as the proposed
development and is designed to be compatible with the
scale of surrounding development and the unique
circumstances of the site. Given the expansive nature of
the lot, the size of the dwelling is appropriate and maintains
a harmonious relationship with neighboring properties.
The proposal satisfies PO8(b) as the development
prioritises a low site impact to maximise the retention of
existing site characteristics, including native vegetation
and natural landforms. The careful placement of the
building minimises disruption to the landscape and allows
for the preservation of important ecological features. The
proposed development preserves the existing vegetation
and relocates where possible. Identified trees have been
retained and indigenous planting species remain in place
that contribute to screening and visually softening the
development. These natural elements have been retained
and or relocated within the site to provide natural buffering
and enhance the visual continuity between the built
environment and the surrounding landscape.
ily vegetated area
Alison Park's he
The proposal satisfies PO8(c) by incorporating large areas
of soft landscaping within, ontop and around the dwelling,
by promoting a seamless integration with the environment.
The proposal not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of the
surroundings but also supports local biodiversity and
contributes to the overall green space of the area.
The proposal satisfies PO8(d) as the development
incorporates a strategy of stepping down with the natural
slope, thereby minimising the apperance of any bulk form
seen from adjacent properties, roads or other areas in the
vicinity of the site. The developments architectural
features, landscaping, and stepped building heights,
integrates harmoniously with the surrounding environment.
This approach enhances the visual aesthetics of the area
while maintaining a scale that is consistent with
neighboring structures. Overall, the development promotes
a sense of openness and contributes positively to the
\\ character of the neighborhood.
birds eye view - study 02
ARTISTIC IMPRESSIONS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY - REFER DRAWINGS FOR DETAIL. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
REV DATE PROJECT CLIENT DRAWING NAME PHASE DWG NO Etlitantemmerers
shaun lockyer architects 33 Ross Crescent, Ross Crescent Family site study SD 110.03 SCALE cS
indicated
www.lockyerarchitects.com.au . 07 3257 7288 Sunshine Beach Trust birds eye view study hematic desi
nominated architect: Shaun Lockyer 2455 QLD . 9377 NSW RFI senematic desien 1:1@ A3
Do not scale from drawings. Dimensions are to be checked on site prior to commencement of work. Discrepancies to be brought to the attention of the author. Any dimensions not nominated must be referred to the Architect for confirmation. The concepts and information contained in this document are the copyright of Architect. Use or copying of the document in whole or in part without the written permission of the Architect constitutes an infringement of copyright.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
240920 - 33 Ross Crescent RFI Response.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.