Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Council archive · source document

PM Submission - Andrew Barber - MCU25/0118

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 From:                     "Andrew Barber" <[email protected]>
                 Sent:                     Sun, 23 Nov 2025 12:51:16 +1000
                 To:                       "Mailbox Council Mail" <[email protected]>
                 Subject:                  Submission re Proposed Development at 64 Lake MacDonald drive



                     You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important

                 CAUTION: This email originated outside of Council. Do not open links or attachments
                 if the email is unexpected or unusual.


                 In regard to the proposed housing development at 64 Lake MacDonald Drive my wife and I are
                 absolutely opposed to it and appalled at those councillors that have voted in favour of such a
                 ridiculously high-density housing proposal for this location. We have until now, always been
                 impressed with Noosa Council's ability to execute a balance between tourism, residents and the
                 environment but not anymore; we feel utterly betrayed by those councillors responsible (more
                 akin irresponsible). When we bought our house in Dianella Court one of the major selling points
                 was that we would have a forest as one of our neighbours and the fact that the site was zoned
                 as Community ie. NOT Commercial or Residential space. The fact that that neighbour has been
                 sacrificed is abhorrent. Not only were those trees responsible for preventing the leeching of the
                 toxic chemicals present in many areas of landfill, those the trees have now been slaughtered
                 only to be replaced by a level of housing density and design that is totally inappropriate for that
                 location and well outside the character of a hinterland town such as Cooroy but also outside
                 Cooroy Town Plan itself.

                 We, the residents of the immediate and surrounding areas have been continually fed the
                 prospect of "Community Consultation" in regards to the future of Lots 2 and 3 post-
                 remediation, but remediation is currently far from complete yet Council is putting forth a
                 proposal for its development; is this community consultation? It is not! Council
                 should/must effectively consult not insult! I am convinced that Council's proffered community
                 consultation is nothing more than pacifying lip service paid to the ill-fated local residents ie.
                 Council has already decided that this land will be used for housing development; how else can it
                 justify the amount of money spent on the destruction and remediation of this forest site.
                 Money that could have and should have been better spent on the numerous other locations
                 within the Shire which are more suited to this kind of development and its inherent density ie.
                 not smashed into the outskirts of a hinterland town. It must be emphasised that this
                 "proposed" development at 64 Lake MacDonald drive is in ADDITION to another already
                 approved high-density, 'possibly' 3 storey, 25 unit development at Lot1/62 Lake MacDonald
                 Drive. We are not NIMBY's. We understand and agree with the need for Social Housing at Lot1.
                 But enough is enough. Any further housing developments on the remaining sites, and
                 particularly of such high density, is totally ill-conceived and unacceptable.

                 Again, being located on the outskirts of a hinterland town together with the density of the
                 proposed development(s) is both utterly incongruous and unsatisfactory to say the least.




Document Set ID: 24329339
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

                 Council's response to the current 'housing crisis' by the smashing together of multiple
                 residences into just one, comparatively confined, ill-befitting location is ill-considered,
                 unprofessional and massively flawed.

                 Council is actively and unwittingly allowing the establishment of a ghetto!

                 Andrew Barber

                 School Officer/Learning Support




                                                                             St John's College

                                                                             Perwillowen Road, NAMBOUR 4560

                                                                             Phone 07 5441 5666
                                                                             Email [email protected]
                                                                             Website stjohns.qld.edu.au




                 Brisbane Catholic Education acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the Land and pays respects to Elders past, present and
                 future.




Document Set ID: 24329339
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025

Page 3

                 -- Disclaimer: The content of this e-mail is the view of the sender or stated author and does not necessarily reflect the view of Brisbane Catholic
                 Education. The content, including attachments, is a confidential communication between the sender or stated author and the intended recipient. If
                 you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this e-mail, including attachments, is unauthorised and
                 expressly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and any attachments
                 from your system. Brisbane Catholic Education does not warrant or represent that this email is free from viruses, malicious software or defects.




Document Set ID: 24329339
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025

Used in these records

About this file

File size
215 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PM Submission - Andrew Barber - MCU25_0118.pdf · 215 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.