Information Response_010616 · MCU15/0122

Response:
Refer attached Traffic Response prepared by TTM. The TTM report indicates:

Swept paths of B99/B85 vehicles passing on internal bends on the ramp are shown in Attachment 4
(16BRT0070-3C). The entry to the ramp from the ground level is suitably designed for two-way car
movements. Recommendations are provided in Attachment 4 (16BRT0070-3C) to provide priority to
entering vehicles the basement and to ensure sufficient sight distance in the vicinity of the plantroom.
Should these recommendations be provided, the proposed ramp design is considered suitable.

TTM have review the proposed car park dimensions. It is noted that all parking spaces are 2.6m wide
except spaces 21 and 41. These spaces should be widened to 2.6m to be compliant with AS2890.1
Class 3 requirements. Permanent structures should not be located within PWD bays. As such the
columns adjacent to spaces 16 and 17 should be removed from the development plans. The columns
adjacent to spaces 4 and 5 are suitable as they provide 2.4m wide spaces in compliance with AS2890.6.

An MRV and ambulance bay are located adjacent to the site entry. Swept path analysis of these spaces
is provided in Attachment 4 (16BRT0070-2C).

The amended development proposal now has only one driveway crossover. Additional bicycle spaces
are provided adjacent to the entry walkway are also shown in this plan.

If TTM’s recommendations regarding basement access, removal of columns, and widening of parking
spaces is provided, the development layout will be designed to comply with AS2890.1, AS2890.2 and
AS2890.6 requirements.


11. Indicate on all relevant plans the external works required.

Response:
Refer attached Traffic Response prepared by TTM which includes a plan showing the proposed
external roadworks. A concept services plan prosed by Morgan Consulting Engineers was included
with the original application documentation.


12. Demonstrate how captured water is utilised for all non-potable uses on site.

Response:
Refer correspondence from Morgan Consulting Engineers included within Attachment 3 and amended
Stormwater Management Plan which provide for rainwater re-use for external irrigation purposes.


13. Provide comment to demonstrate that the applicants preferred water quality treatment option
    both achieves the State Planning Policy pollutant reduction targets, has the best water quality
    improvement efficiencies in terms of Lake Doonella’s water quality objectives and current stressors
    and meets Specific Outcome O9 of the Noosa Plan Water Sensitive design code to provide natural
    treatment strategies.

Response:
Refer correspondence from Morgan Consulting Engineers included within Attachment 3 and amended
Stormwater Management Plan which demonstrates compliance with the State Planning Policy
pollutant reduction targets and that an acceptable water quality objective is achieved.


14. Demonstrate the design of proposed bioretention basins provides adequate footprint to facilitate
    for 1:4 batters.

Response:
Refer correspondence from Morgan Consulting Engineers included within Attachment 3 and amended
Stormwater Management Plan which demonstrate that the design provides adequate footprint to
facilitate for 1:4 batters.