SPA Decision Notice - 010.2010.00000627.001 [As Published] · 152010.627

    2010/627




                <


Page 11 of 18


[OCR of page images]
2010/627

 

DERM Permit ‘number: PR 315387; AN 433415; SPAR 00567510

 

eondnons stated m atu parnt poquired ty Me adwoe agancy response for The appeoaben are 2a fokows

The Assessment Manager mest conmsder the potental mpects of the propased development on the ecologeal
valves of the wetland, the wetland eater quabty aed, the wefand water regene Development should ensure he
folowing outcomes

+ There ts no loss of wetland habéat and adverse wmpacts from development are avowed If loss to the
wetland of acverse unpects are usavodable, leas and wnpects ae menrnmed and cfieets are
vestgated m order to achewe no net ines of the unpected wettend vals,

* «The water quabty of any waters in and inked fo the wettend & manntemed and managed to protect the
envronmertal values of the wetland and the water quabty obyectwes Ssted under Schedule 1 of the
Enwroomectal Protectoo (Water Poloy 2009 are acteevod

+ The essing water regene (including surface and groundwater) wih and beked to a wetaad
Managed to protect ecsting natural hydrologeal processes wilten the wetland ecoapsien Thee ncudes
tafeguerang natucet fucherbors wn sine and locaton of the wetland, and retaning and allowng for
rageneeston of yegetsbon

To ereure that the proposed development is able to meet the above outcomes. the Assessment Manager is
encouraged to consider the requirement for a Dufler area between any proposed works and he wetland A
wettand buffer has two components

* G@ SUPPORT ares adjacent to Ihe wetland that mantans and supports he envwoemental values of he
wettend,

* « B SeperHbON alee around the support aoe Pal protects he wetland fromm external threats such as
sediment and nuipent decharge from surrounding Snduse

‘The Assessment Manager shouks ensure that here is a suffoert buffer astance betesen any proposed works
and the referable wetland in order to mantizen the ecologeal functoning and integnty of the wefand Suter
@stances should be mauamesed on order to mamtan essing trodiversity values, habitat connectraty and to
eraremese edge effects

The apphcant is to provide a report prepared and certified by a biologst or equivalent that demonstrates to the
sabefacton of fe acsesament masager thal there are no adverse mmpacts on the ecological vadues and
functoning of he area of mgnticance

Revegetabon of the Suffer o recommended utteng locally nate spaces that reflect the pre-clsanng regoral
Soosystem, weth preference grenn fo endermes speces Plants should be of local provenance where possitle A
Rehatitabon’ Revegetabon Management Plan shoukl stpulaie a weed managemert strategy moluding weed
contre! and plant masntenance over a minemum one year penod Conditioning of any aperowal wath budding or
development envelopes) may also be a useful way to gwve formal effect to any required butler area

The Assessment Manager should conser requenng applicants to prowde a Stoerwater Management Plas to
demonatraie how stormwater, sediment and other run-clf from the 200 (exsoceted weth the constructon and
opersboral phases of dewelopment) well be etlecteety managed to prevent sdverse impacts on wetland valves
Potertal enpacts ace to be addressed through mater sensitive urban denign inching compliance wth Scout>
East Queensiand Regroral Pine 2009-2031 implementation Gudatne Wo 7 Water senwtve urban des ~
desegn otyectwves for whan stormwater management

Development should ensure hat

 

Page 2 of 2- Obt207 Cepaarteveel of Groverevmet bral Riemer Marr aperan et

Page 11 of 18