Original source · versioned page text
PM Submission Object - Peter & Valerie Beer MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
From: Peter Beer
Sent: 22 Apr 2017 16:10:47 +1000
To: Mailbox Council Mail
Subject: Objection to the Scanlon Group Development Proposal
Attachments: Peregian objection.pdf
Please see attached.
Regards
Peter Beer
Document Set ID: 20306897
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
Patrick Murphy The Assessment Officer Noosa Shire Council [email protected] Dear Mr Murphy, File No MCU 16/153 REC 16/0041 Postal Address 215 David Low Way, PEREGIAN BEACH Proposed Development Multiple Housing-Type 4, Visitor Accomodation Objection to the Scanlon Group Development Proposal 1) This Material Change of use Application contravenes. the Noosa Town Plan & will destroy Peregian’s point of difference & the attraction of our village for residents, holiday makers & shoppers. The Caravan Park amenity, that was the real ‘essence’ of Peregian village, will be replaced by urban density with scarce landscaping to soften the architectural bulk & concrete structures. 2) There’s No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with the majority of the accommodation proposed for Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly provides low cost visitor accommodation for the needs of this community nor the wider Noosa Shire. Peregian Beach has already been adversely impacted by nearby ‘new’ small lot housing developments that lack public amenity, open space & village lifestyle. Low cost accommodation for campers & RVs would be an acceptable community solution, celebrating the open space & providing a beach holiday experience for all. 3) Setbacks in general & to the Rufous laneway in particular, impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous St Renewal which is currently in progress, community amenity values & the extensive community consultation process intended to activate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade & encourage increased useage. The leafy ambience planned for both Rufous laneway & Pocket Park to encourage parking & pedestrian access to the village would be greatly compromised by the 2m proximity & 7m height of the proposed Reed & Wallum buildings, on top of whatever level of fill is added to natural ground level. 4.) The Development's significant impact on the Creek & Wetland, both during construction & upon completion is of tremendous concern, as is the planned density of housing on top of & beside this ecologically sensitive reserve, adjacent Noosa National Park — Emu Swamp Section. The natural spring, recognised in the 1960s & probably for thousands of years by our indigenous forebears, known locally as Little Rufous Creek creates a watercourse that feeds into the wetland & contributes to its ecological value. Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise to 150 trips per day for at least 3 months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-4 minutes along David Low Way, down Sandpiper Court, through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron St roundabout. The impacts of such large amounts of fill, will create fragmentation & attrition of the watercourse, its habitat values & biodiversity - an environmental injustice for Qld Govt’s identified Mandatory Essential Habitat .
Page 3
Patrick Murphy The Assessment Officer Noosa Shire Council [email protected] Dear Mr Murphy, File No MCU 16/153 REC 16/0041 Postal Address 215 David Low Way, PEREGIAN BEACH Proposed Development Multiple Housing-Type 4, Visitor Accomodation Objection to the Scanlon Group Development Proposal 1) This Material Change of use Application contravenes. the Noosa Town Plan & will destroy Peregian’s point of difference & the attraction of our village for residents, holiday makers & shoppers. The Caravan Park amenity, that was the real ‘essence’ of Peregian village, will be replaced by urban density with scarce landscaping to soften the architectural bulk & concrete structures. 2) There’s No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with the majority of the accommodation proposed for Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly provides low cost visitor accommodation for the needs of this community nor the wider Noosa Shire. Peregian Beach has already been adversely impacted by nearby ‘new’ small lot housing developments that lack public amenity, open space & village lifestyle. Low cost accommodation for campers & RVs would be an acceptable community solution, celebrating the open space & providing a beach holiday experience for all. 3) Setbacks in general & to the Rufous laneway in particular, impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous St Renewal which is currently in progress, community amenity values & the extensive community consultation process intended to activate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade & encourage increased useage. The leafy ambience planned for both Rufous laneway & Pocket Park to encourage parking & pedestrian access to the village would be greatly compromised by the 2m proximity & 7m height of the proposed Reed & Wallum buildings, on top of whatever level of fill is added to natural ground level. 4.) The Development’s significant impact on the Creek & Wetland, both during construction & upon completion is of tremendous concern, as is the planned density of housing on top of & beside this ecologically sensitive reserve, adjacent Noosa National Park — Emu Swamp Section. The natural spring, recognised in the 1960s & probably for thousands of years by our indigenous forebears, known locally as Little Rufous Creek creates a watercourse that feeds into the wetland & contributes to its ecological value. Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise to 150 trips per day for at least 3 months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-4 minutes along David Low Way, down Sandpiper Court, through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron St roundabout. The impacts of such large amounts of fill, will create fragmentation & attrition of the watercourse, its habitat values & biodiversity - an environmental injustice for Qld Govt’s identified Mandatory Essential Habitat .
Page 4
There is no reference in the DA to the planned disturbance to essential wetland habitat for the vulnerable Wallum Froglet( Crinia tinnula), Wallum Rocketfrog (Litoria freycinet), Wallum Sedgefrog (Litoria oblongburensis), nor the impact on wetland heathland & sedgeplain, inhabited by the vulnerable Ground Parrot (Pezoporus wallicus) recorded less than 500ms from the site. * 5) Significant & continuous Noise & Disruption to homes along David Low Way, adjoining streets, laneway, PB Hotel, Hardware store, business & private premises in the vicinity of the roadways & roundabout is guaranteed. The impact will be to the detriment of acoustic & visual qualities, lifestyle, holiday village ambience & business, especially the al fresco dining/coffee shops that all enjoy fresh air & ocean sounds. 6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is assured during construction as standing traffic queues currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak times, exacerbated further during school & public holidays. The proposed development risks being a serious source of additional congestion & given the layout/landform, nigh on impossible to mitigate in the future. 7) Foreground Vistas of the wetland & its vegetation across Noosa National Park-Emu Swamp Section to Mt Cooroy will be diminished, in fact lost, to the bulky Hotel/Motel building’s projected heights. Council needs to ensure height specifications are accurate & the current expansive views are maintained. Here’s an opportunity to protect & showcase the intent of Noosa’s logo ‘Different by Nature’ by altering design or lowering the amount of fill to protect the invaluable amenity of open space & ‘community vistas’. 8) Other concerns include density of buildings & infrastructure within the precinct, the provision of scarce green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight & natural breezes, the provision of public access pathway between two story buildings, with little to recommend passive surveillance, particularly at night. Light pollution is a further issue as every new light bulb impacts adversely on Peregian’s disappearing night sky, particularly of concern with the density planned for this site. 9) So many missed opportunities to work with community in consultation with Noosa Council’s Master Plan for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the amenity. The north western corner’s existing vegetation could have seen the creation of green space/parkland to embellish the precinct for visitors & local community with potential to make genuine connections between Rufous St /laneway with this development. Instead, it separates itself from the village feel, in fact opposes the local residential community & village activities associated with the function & interaction of Veggie Village, Tennis Club, Kindergarten & Community House, all nearby neighbours of the planned development. This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those who choose this relaxed pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It delivers instead, undesirable urban density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with Peregian’s much sought after open space linkages, relaxed village character & community engagement. | urge Noosa Council to protect & retain the village of Peregian Beach, to stand strong behind the intent of the Noosa Town Plan & refuse this Development Application. Peter and Valerie Beer 2/2 Piper St Peregian Beach 21° April 2017