Attachment 5 - Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan

 

0125 25 375 50 625 125
——————

(A3) 1:2400

 

 

 

LEGEND
THE SITE LOW POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY VERY HIGH POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY
9RP225312
; 150m ASSESSMENT BUFFER MEDIUM POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY
' '

 

 

 

 

20m to East
15m to South

 

 

Limit of NSC Approved Fire Break [| HIGH POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE INTENSITY

 

 

Sub Unit 1 - Slope assessed as 1 degree due to Sub Unit being located across slope relevant to the development area.

(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting forest as the relevant vegetation type)

 

 

 

Combined . F

“ Surface and Fire Weather Maximum pore Potential

Vegetation Hazard Class Total Fuel . Landscape| Fireline
# ea Load (t/ha) Seve Slope Intensity StS
Surface Fuel (FFDI) (demees (kw/m) Intensity*
Load (t/ha)

VHC 22.1 - Melaleuca open
forests on seasonall
inundated lowland cas oe coe “3 s ae
swamps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sub Unit 2 - Slope assessed as 1 degree due to Sub Unit being located across slope relevant to the development area.

(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting woodland as the relevant vegetation type)

 

 

ooo Maximum] Potential
. Surface and Fire Weather a Potential
Vegetation Hazard Class Total Fuel . Landscape| Fireline
# ea Load (t/ha) Seve Slope Intensity StS
Surface Fuel (FFDI) (demees (kw/m) Intensity*
Load (t/ha) s
VHC 29.2 - Woodlands
associated with heathlands, 16.8 24.3 48 1. 13,017 Medium
scrubs, and shrublands

 

Sub Unit 3 - Slope assessed as 1 degree due to Sub Unit being located across slope relevant to the development area.

(Fireline intensity calculated using Flamesol modelling adopting shrubland as the relevant vegetation type)

 

 

 

Seed Maximum] Potential
Vegetation Hazard Class BU eee Total Fuel oe eared Landscape Fireline vor pu
# Neal Load (t/ha) weveny Slope Intensi Bont
Surface Fuel (FFDI) (de ue vay Intensity*
Load (t/ha) Fy

 

VHC 34.5 - Sedgeland
dominated wetlands 8 13 48 1 20,621 [ver |

 

 

 

Sub Unit 4
Combined
- Maximum | Potential
Vegetation Hazard Class pute aie Total Fuel Fite Mental Landscape] Fireline nga
# Neat Load (t/ha) Se NEIEY Slope Intensi Busby

Surface Fuel (FFOD | ge ay ‘eu ae Intensity*

Load (t/ha) £
VHC 39.2 - hows to moderate 5 8 48 N/A N/A** ow.
‘tree cover in built-up areas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

# From: Leonard, J., & Opie, K, (2017) Estimating the potential bushfire hazard of vegetation patches and corridors —
an enhancement of Queensland’s methodology for State-wide mapping of bushfire prone areas. CSIRO, Australia.
* From: Leonard, J., Newnham, G., Opie, K., and Blanchi, R. (2014) Anew methodology for state-wide mapping of
bushfire prone areas in Queensland. CSIRO, Australia.

** Fireline intensity, radiant heat flux, and busfhrie attack level are not calculated for non-bushfire prone VHCs
(grass fire prone VHCs (prone type = 2) orlow hazard VHCs (prone type = 3) as per Bushfire Resilient Communities
2019 Sections 7.5.2, 7.6 & Figure 14.

  
     

 

  
 

 

 

North Coz PROJECT TITLE Lia JOB: Lael Bia NC
fA En ental Poo 86 Paste Pate ls se: [BUSHFIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT OZCARE SUB UNITS J000542 BFO2 A
yf PEIVICeS an hn, ABN: 60 625 108 625 1 00 COOYAR STRE EN, NOOSA HEADS A PRELIMINARY: _ 2022 2 = 2s moc nen er on army . SCALE 1:2400 @ A3 iN A