Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Noosaville Locality Code - Division 17

Attached to the e-mail Assessment against codes MCU16/0138 & OPW16/0257.

of 13

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Noosaville Locality Code

Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for Division 17

                SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                                 PROBABLE SOLUTIONS   COMPLIANCE                  COMMENTS
 11.9 EFFECTS OF USE
 Amenity
 O1 Uses are located, designed and operated to             No solution provided                           Yes       The proposed Duplex’s are designed to not
 avoid significant adverse changes to the light, air                                                                impact upon the amenity of surrounding
 quality, noise, accessibility or other conditions                                                                  landholders in regards to light, air quality,
 enjoyed by users of associated, adjoining or nearby                                                                noise and accessibility.
 uses
 Major Road Network
 O2 Through traffic in Noosaville uses Gibson              No solution provided                           N/A       The proposal obtains direct access from
 Road or Eenie Creek Road, ensuring the visual                                                                      Gympie Terrace. Accordingly, the proposal
 amenity of Gympie Terrace is protected with a                                                                      does not result in through traffic traversing
 consequent enhancement of visitor and recreation                                                                   through Gympie Terrace.
 opportunities and benefit to businesses along
 Gympie Terrace.
 Visual Amenity
 O3 The visual amenity and character surrounding           No solution provided                           Yes       The proposed Duplex’s do not compromise
 the major road network is protected and enhances                                                                   the character and identity of Noosaville
 the recognisable entrance to Noosaville through—                                                                   through being appropriately situated so as
 a) retaining and enhancing the visual and                                                                          to not diminish the visual and physical
 physical separation of Noosaville from other                                                                       separation of Noosaville from other
 localities; and                                                                                                    localities.
 b) ensuring development does not encroach upon
 existing native vegetation along the road frontage                                                                 Additionally, the proposal does not impact
 other than for accessways..                                                                                        upon any natural features as identified in
                                                                                                                    the Noosaville Biodiversity Overlay.
Log in to download the original file

Noosaville Locality Code - Division 17.pdf · 49 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 12 pages

Page 2

               SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                                   PROBABLE SOLUTIONS   COMPLIANCE                  COMMENTS
Neighbourhood Identities
O4 The separate identities of the various residential       No solution provided                           Yes       It is noted that Multiple Housing – Type 2
neighbourhoods remain important and distinct                                                                         Duplex are a consistent land use within the
elements of the residential character of Noosaville.                                                                 Attached Housing Zone. Accordingly, the
                                                                                                                     proposed development is inline with the
                                                                                                                     desired character of the area and does not
                                                                                                                     compromise any residential character
                                                                                                                     elements within the Attached Housing
                                                                                                                     Zone, within Noosaville Localty.
Lake Entrance Boulevard
O5 There is no increase in the number of lots that          No solution provided                           N/A       The proposed development does not
gain access via Lake Entrance Boulevard.                                                                             propose an increase to the number of lots
                                                                                                                     that gain access to Lake Entrance
                                                                                                                     Boulevard.
Airport
O6 Development and use of premises within 750m              No solution provided                           N/A       The proposed development is not located
of the airport do not cause an obstruction or other                                                                  within 750 metres to the airport.
potential hazard to aircraft movement associated
with the airport by the way of— a) the physical
intrusion of buildings or other structures into aircraft
take-off and approach flight paths;
b) attracting birds or bats to the area, which could
cause or contribute to bird-strike hazard;
c) providing very bright lighting or lighting similar
to runway lighting, which can distract or confuse
aircraft pilots;
d) interfering with navigation or communication
facilities;
e) emissions that may affect pilot visibility or aircraft
operations; and
f) transient intrusions into the airport’s operational

Page 3

             SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                               PROBABLE SOLUTIONS   COMPLIANCE                COMMENTS
airspace.
See Figure 11.1 – Airport traffic area
11.10 BUILT FORM
Density
O7 The density of development within the site         No solution provided                           Yes       The proposal complies with the maximum
area—                                                                                                          density provisions of 100 persons per
a) is compatible with surrounding development; and                                                             hectare, with the proposed Duplex at 113
b) does not exceed—                                                                                            Gympie Terrace providing a density of 84
i. for the Semi-Attached Housing Zone:                                                                         persons per hectare and the proposed
A. for sites between 500m2 and 599m2 inclusive—                                                                Duplex at 111 Gympie Terrace providing a
4.8 persons;                                                                                                   density of 98 persons per hectare.
B. for sites 600m2 or more — 6.6 persons or 100
persons per hectare whichever is the higher;
ii. for the Attached Housing Zone a maximum
population density of 100 persons per hectare
with the exception of Lot 21 on RP815864
situated at 11-13 William Street which has an
allowable population density of 320 persons per
hectare exclusively for the purpose of a visitor
hostel
iii. For the Visitor Mixed Use Zone— 160 persons
per hectare; and
iv. for the Business Centre Zone a maximum
population density of 100 persons per hectare with
the exception of Lots 3 & 4 on RP122928 situated at
14-16 Mary Street which have an allowable
population density of 320 persons per hectare
exclusively for the purpose of a visitor hostel
v. for the Shire Business Centre Zone 160 persons
per hectare or 320 persons per hectare exclusively
for the purpose of a visitor hostel vi. for the

Page 4

             SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                               PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                   COMPLIANCE                      COMMENTS
Community Services Zone maximum population
density of 320 persons per hectare exclusively for
the purposes of Residential Aged Care and 160
persons per hectare for any other form of
Retirement & Special Needs Housing; and
c) has a low site impact to enhance the opportunity
to maintain natural site characteristics, including
native vegetation and natural landforms.
Height
O8 Buildings and other structures—                    S8.1 Buildings and other structures have a maximum building height of—      Complies with   The proposal exceeds the preferred
a) are low rise and have a visual bulk and an         a) if in the Attached Housing Zone – 8m, with the exception of those        Performance     maximum building height of 8 metres
architectural scale consistent with structures on     properties with frontage to the following streets: -                          Outcome       identified in Probable Solution S8.1 of the
adjoining or nearby land;                             Russell St, William St and Howard St, or Weyba Rd, James St and Albert                      code.
b) do not exceed a building height of —               St north of their intersections with Elizabeth St (as well as properties
i. for the Attached Housing Zone 2 storeys unless     fronting Gympie Terrace or Noosa Parade between Weyba Road and                              It is noted that the only reason the
located on property with frontage to the following    Russell Street) where they have a maximum building height of 12m;                           development exceeds the 8 metre height
streets: -                                            b) if in the Visitor Mixed Use Zone – 12m;                                                  limit is due to the site being identified as a
Russell St, William St and Howard St, or Weyba Rd,    c) if in the Business Centre or Industry Zones — 10m;                                       Flood Hazard Area, which requires the site
James St and Albert St north of their intersections   d) if in the Shire Business Centre Zone – 8m, except in Precinct E1 or E2                   to be filled in order for the development to
with Elizabeth St (as well as properties fronting     where 12m or in Precinct REC/MU where 6m;                                                   mitigate flood impacts. The provided Flood
Gympie Terrace or Noosa Parade between Weyba          e) in all other zones—8m.                                                                   Search Certificate (Appendix VI) obtained
Road and Russell Street), where they are not to                                                                                                   from Council identifies a required Finished
exceed a maximum building height of 3 storeys;                                                                                                    Floor Level of 2.82m AHD. It is noted that
ii. for the Visitor Mixed Use Zone– 3 storeys,                                                                                                    the proposed development provides a
although present only 1-2 storey façades to Gympie                                                                                                Finished Floor Level of 2.82m AHD
Terrace;
iii. for the Shire Business Centre Zone– 2 storeys,                                                                                               Despite the non-complies with Probable
except in Precinct E1 and E2 where 3 storeys and                                                                                                  Solution S8.1 of the code, the proposed
Precinct REC/MU where 1 storey; and                                                                                                               development complies with Specific
iv. for all other zones— 2 storeys;                                                                                                               Outcome O8, as the development does not
c) do not visually dominate the street or                                                                                                         exceed two (2) storeys, contains an

Page 5

              SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                           PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                COMPLIANCE                      COMMENTS
surrounding spaces;                                                                                                                         articulated low rise built form, which does
d) preserve the amenity of surrounding land;                                                                                                not dominate the streetscape through the
e) ensure that development responds to the site                                                                                             use of a variety of building materials and
topography; and                                                                                                                             articulations. It is also noted that the
f) are well articulated with strong horizontal and                                                                                          development        is     consistent    with
vertical design elements to provide an                                                                                                      development to the east on both sides of
interesting streetscape and to complement                                                                                                   Gympie Terrace, which consists of
landform changes and landscapes.                                                                                                            accommodation buildings containing two
                                                                                                                                            (2) storey development.

                                                                                                                                            It is also noted that Council officers at the
                                                                                                                                            pre-lodgement meeting indicated that ‘The
                                                                                                                                            relaxation required for building height was
                                                                                                                                            discussed and is likely to be supported,
                                                                                                                                            given the minimum floor height
                                                                                                                                            requirements for the site and floor to ceiling
                                                                                                                                            heights proposed are not excessive’.

                                                                                                                                            Accordingly, the proposed development
                                                                                                                                            complies with Probable Solution O8 of the
                                                                                                                                            code and is consistent with Council’s
                                                                                                                                            expectations for development within the
                                                                                                                                            area, with Council officers providing
                                                                                                                                            support for proposal exceeding the
                                                                                                                                            maximum building height requirements.
Setbacks
O9 Buildings and other structures are                S9.1 Buildings and structures comply with the setbacks identified in   Complies with   The proposed development does not
appropriately designed and sited to—                 Schedule 1 - Minimum Boundary Setbacks.                                Performance     comply with all setback requirements
a) provide amenity for users of the premises as                                                                               Criteria      specified within Schedule 1 of the planning
well as preserve the visual and acoustic                                                                                                    scheme, with the proposed development at
amenity of adjoining and nearby properties;                                                                                                 111 Gympie Terrace seeking a variation to

Page 6

            SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                      PROBABLE SOLUTIONS   COMPLIANCE                  COMMENTS
b) provide adequate distance from adjoining                                          the rear boundary setback, and the
land uses;                                                                           proposed development at 113 Gympie
c) allow space for required vehicle parking;                                         Terrace seeking a variation to the second
d) preserve any existing vegetation that will                                        storey side boundary setback and the rear
buffer the proposed building;                                                        setback.
e) allow for landscaping to b S9.1 Buildings and
structures comply with                                                               Despite this, it is noted that the
the setbacks identified in Schedule 1 -                                              development provides sufficient distance
Minimum Boundary Setbacks.e provided between                                         between current and future land uses on
buildings;                                                                           adjoining lots.
f) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of
buildings and landscape elements within the                                          This is due to the rear boundary of 111
street;                                                                              Gympie Terrace adjoining land within the
g) avoid large areas of continuous wall planes                                       Open Space Recreational Zone, which
by varying the building setbacks and using                                           does not support further development
appropriate techniques to provide visual                                             potential.
relief; and
h) help protect the natural character and visual                                     It is also noted that the rear boundary of
amenity of the Noosa River system and other                                          113 Gympie Terrace adjoins a site, which
watercourses.                                                                        contains a 6 metre wide easement for
                                                                                     sewerage purposes, thus, providing a total
                                                                                     setback of 10 metres between
                                                                                     developments. It is also noted that eastern
                                                                                     boundary of the lot adjoins a 10 metre wide
                                                                                     driveway on 109 Gympie Terrace. Thus
                                                                                     providing a setback in excess of 12 metres
                                                                                     for the full boundary of the site.

                                                                                     In addition to the above, the proposed
                                                                                     development does not compromise Specific
                                                                                     Outcome 09, as the development:

Page 7

              SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                              PROBABLE SOLUTIONS   COMPLIANCE                   COMMENTS
                                                                                                                Preserves the visual and acoustic
                                                                                                                 amenity of nearby properties;

                                                                                                                Provides adequate separation distance
                                                                                                                 between adjoining land uses;

                                                                                                                Allow sufficient space for vehicle parking;

                                                                                                                Allows sufficient space for landscaping;
                                                                                                                 and,

                                                                                                                Provides an appropriate designed
                                                                                                                 development, which reflects the
                                                                                                                 character of the area and does not result
                                                                                                                 in continuous blank walls.

Site cover, gross floor area and plot ratio
O10 The site cover, gross floor area and plot ratio   No solution provided                           Yes       The proposed Duplex at 111 Gympie
of buildings and other roofed structures—                                                                      Terrace contain a site cover of 38.5%, and
a) results in a building scale that is compatible                                                              the proposed Duplex at 113 Gympie
with surrounding development;                                                                                  Terrace contains a site cove of 37.2%.
b) does not present an appearance of bulk to
adjacent properties, roads or other areas in
the vicinity of the site;
c) maximises the retention of existing vegetation
and allows for soft landscaping between
buildings;
d) allows for adequate area at ground level for
outdoor recreation, entertainment, clothes
drying and other site facilities; and
e) facilitates onsite stormwater management and
vehicular access.

Page 8

             SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                        PROBABLE SOLUTIONS   COMPLIANCE   COMMENTS
O11 Site cover—
a) for a class 1 or class 10a structure within the
Detached Housing Zone, does not exceed—
i for a single storey building - 50%; or
ii for a building of 2 or more storeys - 50%
on the ground floor and 30% for the
upper storey(s), or 40% for all storeys
for a building of 2 or more storeys;
b) for other classes with the Detached Housing
Zone, does not exceed—40%;
c) for the Semi-Attached Housing Zone does not
exceed 40%;
d) for the Attached Housing Zone does not exceed
40%;
e) for the Visitor Mixed Use Zone does not
exceed 40%; or
f) for the Shire Business Centre Zone in
Precincts E1, E2, E6 and E7 does not exceed
50%.
O12 For the Semi-Attached Housing Zone
buildings do not exceed a plot ratio of 0.45:1
O13 For the Attached Housing Zone the maximum
gross floor area is equivalent to the maximum
allowable population in persons multiplied by 40m2
.
O14 For the Visitor Mixed Use Zone, the maximum
gross floor area equals the allowable population in
persons multiplied by 40m2
, provided that the gross
floor area does not exceed 13,600m2
.

Page 9

              SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                              PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                  COMPLIANCE                COMMENTS
O15 For the Business Centre Zone, outside of the
Mary Street/Thomas Street Precinct the maximum
plot ratio is —
a) 0.8:1 for site areas up to and including
2,000m2
; plus
b) 0.3:1 for the balance portion of the site area in
excess of 2000m2
.
O16 Within the Shire Business Centre Zone, the
maximum plot ratio for development within the
following precincts is —
a) Precincts B1 and B2 combined- 0.5:1;
b) Precinct B3- 0.8;
c) Precinct E1- 0.6;
d) Precinct E2- 0.6;
e) Precinct E3- 0.6;
f) Precinct E4- 0.6;
g) Precinct E5- 0.6
h) Precinct E6- 0.6;
i) Precinct E7- 0.6;
j) Precinct RES- 0.6; and
k) Precinct REC/MU- 0.1.
Flooding and drainage
O17 Buildings and other works are designed and         S17.1 For new buildings or structures or additions of more than 50m2         Yes       The proposed development has been
sited to—                                              gross floor area to an existing building or structure, floor levels for                designed in accordance with a relevant
a) provide flood free access to premises and           habitable rooms are not less than the specified minimum floor levels;                  Flood Information Certificate.
flood free habitable areas;                            AND
b) allow only minor, short term and infrequent         S17.2 Where Council infrastructure is available—                             Yes       The development will be connected to
flooding of non-habitable areas;                       a) any drainage (including buildings and yards) flows to that                          Council’s stormwater network.
c) ensure carparking areas can be adequately           infrastructure; and

Page 10

             SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                         PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                   COMPLIANCE                       COMMENTS
drained;                                        b) the infrastructure has the capacity to accept any additional loading;
d) ensure drainage does not adversely impact    AND
upon other premises; and                        S17.3 For Residential Uses—                                                  Inconsistency   Both proposed Duplex developments result
e) ensure filling or excavation does not        a) where slab on ground construction is used, filling does not extend       Between Codes    in the filling of the entire sites. This is not
adversely impact upon other premises by—        more than 1m beyond the building footprint and access to car parking                         compliant with Probable Solution S17.3 of
i. causing ponding on the site or nearby        areas, measured from the outer walls of the building ; or                                    the code.
land;                                           b) the design consists of a suspended floor construction;
ii. increasing flooding, which adversely        AND                                                                                          Despite the non-compliance with the code,
affects the safety or use of any land                                                                                                        it is noted that Probable Solution S18.1 of
upstream and downstream; and                                                                                                                 the Natural Hazards Overlay Code
iii. adversely affecting the flow of water in                                                                                                specifies that the entire lot must be located
any overland flow path.                                                                                                                      above Q100 ARI.
                                                                                                                                             Section 2.4 of the planning scheme
                                                                                                                                             specifies that that an Overlay Code prevails
                                                                                                                                             to the extent of the inconsistency.
                                                                                                                                             Accordingly, the Probable Solution
                                                                                                                                             prescribed in this code, is overridden by
                                                                                                                                             requirements of the overlay code.
                                                S17.4 Car parking and maneuvering areas are constructed at a level that          Yes         All elements of the development have been
                                                permits the parking area to drain from the site by gravity means, without                    designed in accordance with a relevant
                                                the need for mechanical pumping;                                                             Flood Information Certificate and drain to
                                                AND                                                                                          Gympie Terrace.
                                                S17.5 Basements for residential uses have flood immunity above the               N/A         Neither Duplex development proposes a
                                                Q100 where alternative means to mechanical pumping are used to                               basement.
                                                achieve such immunity; or
                                                S17.6 Basements for non-residential uses have flood immunity above the           N/A         Neither Duplex development proposes a
                                                Q100 that may be achieved by means of mechanical pumping where the                           basement.
                                                mechanical feature is installed with adequate holding tanks and an
                                                alternative back up power source.
Sloping sites
O18 Development on sloping sites—               S18.1 Buildings and associated accessways are not constructed on land            N/A         The sites do not contain significant slopes.

Page 11

              SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                               PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                    COMPLIANCE                  COMMENTS
a) is responsive to the natural topography of the      with a slope greater than 1 in 4 (25%);
site and minimises cut and fill;                       AND
b) does not visually dominate the hill slope or        S18.2 Buildings are of split level design that step down the slope or have      N/A
interrupt the skyline;                                 a suspended floor construction;
c) is integrated with the natural site                 AND
characteristics including vegetation; and              S18.3 Cut or fill is less than 2m in depth;                                     N/A
d) for Multiple housing, takes the form of small       AND
separate buildings;                                    S18.4 The distance between the ground and the lowest part of the floor          N/A
AND                                                    of the building does not exceed 3m to avoid large under building areas;
O19 On sites which are visible from the major road     AND
network, areas of public open space, the Noosa         S18.5 Buildings present no more than 3 storeys at any one point.                N/A
River or the beaches new buildings and structures
including outbuildings, are designed so as not to      S19.1 No solution provided                                                      N/A
dominate or detract from the scenic and
environmental qualities of the site and its setting.
Roof Form
O20 Rooflines—                                         S20.1 With the exception of buildings within the Industry Zone, the main        Yes       The main roof of both Duplex buildings
a) contribute positively to the local skyline;         roof of the building has a roof pitch no less than 5 degrees and has                      contains a roof pitch in excess of 5%.
b) complement the character of the locality;           minimum 600mm eaves to at least 75% of the perimeter of the building;                     Additionally, the both Duplex buildings
c) are articulated, pitched or skillion;               AND                                                                                       contain 600mm eaves for the majority of
d) avoid low pitched (eg. less than 5 degrees) or      S20.2 Buildings and structures do not include roof top terraces.                          both built form (exceeding 75%).
box roof profiles/parapets; and
e) do not create opportunities for residents to
overlook the private open space areas of
neighbouring properties.
11.11 ENVIRONMENT, CONSERVATION AND RECREATION
Environment and cultural heritage values
O22 There are no significant adverse effects on        No solution provided                                                            Yes       The proposal does not impact upon any
biodiversity, native vegetation, native fauna habitat,                                                                                           biodiversity, native vegetation, native fauna
landscaped quality, water quality or cultural heritage ADVISORY NOTE:                                                                            habitat, landscaped quality, water quality or
values, including those related to—                                                                                                              cultural heritage values.

Page 12

             SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                             PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                COMPLIANCE                  COMMENTS
a) changes to natural drainage;                      PSP24 – Effluent Disposal details requirements for the design and
b) management of fire risk;                          siting of effluent disposal systems where located outside a
c) erosion and the transport of sediments off        sewerage service area. Compliance with PSP24 will be considered
site;                                                as part of Council’s assessment of the plumbing and drainage
d) unmanaged public access;                          application.
e) effluent disposal72;
f) changes to fauna habitat and behaviour; and
g) disturbance of buildings and features,
including natural features of cultural heritage
significance
Open Space Network
O23 An integrated open space network is              S23.1 Open space corridors and existing native vegetation in areas         N/A       The proposal does not impact upon any
established throughout the locality and—             indicated in Schedule 5 – Map 4 are protected from                                   open space corridors and existing native
a) allows for both passive and active recreational   fragmentation and encroachment by development.                                       vegetation in areas indicated in Schedule 5.
pursuits;                                            S24.1 No solution provided
b) provides safe and convenient connectivity for
pedestrians and cyclists to neighbourhood
centres, community services and other key
destinations such as public open space, the
Noosa River and Wallace Estate;
c) provides habitat connectivity for wildlife;
d) protects watercourses and drainage lines in
the lowlands; and
e) forms a scenic backdrop for the locality’s
residential neighbourhoods.
AND
O24 Physical and visual links between public open
space areas and watercourses are retained.
Pedestrian and bicycle pathways
O25 Safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle       S25.1 Pedestrian and bicycle pathways are provided and retained where      N/A       Both sites contain a footpath for the full
pathways are provided and retained between and       indicated in the Priority Infrastructure Plan in Part 15;                            frontage of Gympie Terrace.

Page 13

             SPECIFIC OUTCOMES                                               PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                  COMPLIANCE                  COMMENTS
around key destinations including—                    AND
a) an east-west link between the Tewantin &           S25.2 Contributions toward pedestrian and bicycle pathways are                N/A       Both sites contain a footpath for the full
Doonan Locality and the Noosa Heads Locality          provided in accordance with the Priority Infrastructure Plan in Part 15.                frontage of Gympie Terrace. Accordingly,
along the Noosa River foreshore;                                                                                                              no contributions are required toward
b) a north-south link between the Shire Business                                                                                              pedestrian and bicycle pathways.
Centre and Wallace Park to the Noosa River
foreshore
c) recreation areas off Shorehaven Drive and
Seacove Court;
d) scouting facilities at Gympie Terrace and
Gibson Road;
e) the Australian Rules field at Weyba Road; and
f) camping and caravanning facilities at Munna
Point.

Foreshore character
O26 The natural landscape character and               No solution provided                                                          N/A       The subject sites area not located within a
vegetation along the foreshore areas of the Noosa                                                                                             foreshore area.
River, Lakes Doonella and Weyba and Eenie
Creek, Noosa National Park, Keyser Island and
Weyba Creek Conservation Parks is protected.
Watercourses
O27 The environmental, economic, amenity and          No solution provided                                                          N/A       The subject sites area not located adjacent
transportation values of the Noosa River system are                                                                                           to a watercourse.
protected.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.