Original source · versioned page text
SUPERSEDED Compiled Plans OPW20/0145.02
The original of this document is very large (48.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 103, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnTree Analysis: Disturbance footprint
Observations and Considerations
The vegetation currently occupying the site is aged between 40 to 50-years old, with a few older remnant trees that were
retained when the site was cleared. Tree species observed include, but not limited to, Eucalyptus resinifera (Red Mahogany),
Syncarpia glomulifera subsp. glomulifera (Turpentine), Corymbia intermedia (Pink Bloodwood), Eucalyptus robusta (Swamp
Mahogany), Melaleuca quinquenervia (Broadleaf Paperbark) Eucalyptus grandis (Flooded Gum) and Lophostemon confertus
(Brush Box). Lophostemon suaveolens (Swamp Box) were a less frequent canopy species. Less common tree species included
Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus microcorys (Tallowwood). Some areas were also dominated by dense regrowth of
Allocasuarina littoralis (Coast She-oak) in areas which have been previously disturbed.
Area Located adjacent to proposed lots
The fringe of the cleared area consists of, but not limited to, spindly regrowth Melaleuca quinquenervia. The clearing works
has and will alter the exposure of the newly created boundary trees, exposing them to environmental forces which they
have not developed to withstand. Numerous subjects have failed due to windthrow, due to insufficient root mass and/or
soil water levels at above field capacity. Saturated soils lose their adhesive qualities and root plates fail by way of a transverse
shear of the plate or ball.
Further examples of windthrow failure are from those subjects with tall slender structures, their height diameter (H/D)
ratios above 50. High H/D ratios have a higher probablity of failure due to the loading of the stem higher than prescribed by
the axiom of uniform stress (Mattheck, C. 2007). There are also numerous long over-extended lower lateral branches
present, which may also fail due to the length to diameter (l/D) ratio when exposed to additional wind forces due to removal
of co-located trees.
Dead trees are also present in varied states of deline and/or degradation within 10m of the the new boundary lines, carparks
and/or footpaths. Deadwood and/or sections of the dead crowns are fall hazard risk to the fringes and/or footpaths to be
constructed.
It is also proposed to cut soil on Lot 2. A Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) would be applicable to retained EMT vegetation along
the Hoffman Drive boundary.
Environmental Considerations
Retained trees have developed symbiotically with the subject to be retained along the boundaries as identified in layout of
retained vegetation highlighted in purple fringes on page 13. These specimens rely on the subjects adjacent for shelter from
the wind forces. These specimens are not listed as threatened or endangered under the Nature Conservation Act and its
regulations.
Recommendation
1. Appoint a project Arborist.
2. Adopt project Arborist guidelines as indicated on Page 12.
3. Appoint a suitably qualified Fauna Spotter Catchcer to underake a pre and post clearing report.
4. Undertake a pre-start meeting to identify and mark clearing lines.
5. Undertake supervised clearing works.
6. Remove trees along the fringe with a higher probability of failure with H/D ratios over 50, as identified by the
project Arborist. Works within the EMT and boundary line shall be undertaken by a suitably qualified AQF Level 3
Arborist in a manner so as not to damage retained vegetation and certified by the project Arborist.
7. Remove dead trees within 10m of the boundary of the EMT zone within failure reach of the boundary. These works
are to be undertaken by a suitably qualified AQF Level 3 Arborist and supervised by the project Arborist.
8. Remove major deadwood within 10m of the boundary of the Emt zones within failure reach of the boundary or
proposed footpath. These works are to be undertaken by a suitably qualified AQF Level 3 Arborist and supervised
by the project Arborist.
Priority Classification
Medium
Arborist Report for 28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville
Prepared by Arbor Operations – July 2020
6|P a g e
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.