Original source · versioned page text
2021-02-25 Special Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (29.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 25 FEBRUARY 2021
Matters Raised Comments
This is an urban activity on land with an The land is within the SEQRP’s Urban Footprint
SEQRP designation of Regional Landscape although outside of the planning schemes town
and Rural Production boundary
Need is not in rural community with limited Whilst acknowledging resident’s concerns regarding
infrastructure in the town the capacity of existing infrastructure within Cooroy to
cope with the development it is noted that both DTMR
Myall and Elm Street intersection will be and Council’s consulting traffic engineer have
further impacted accepted the proposal. However, it is noted that the
proposal is outside of the Priority Infrastructure Area
Increased population will overload services (PIA) and results in the development of 246 dwellings
and facilities on one site in Cooroy whereas the PIA was based on
an assumption of an additional 280 dwellings per year
Road network cannot cope with additional across the entire shire for the years 2016 – 2021
traffic
Impact on Cooroy urban population
Car parking in Cooroy will not cope
Recent development is already placing a
strain on infrastructure
This is a permanent subdivision Whilst the development does have the appearance of
a residential subdivision with permanent dwellings the
The houses are not relocatable applicant has:
• Demonstrated that the dwellings will be certified
as relocatable;
• Not applied for a subdivision;
• Provided a site agreement which demonstrates
the mechanism by which home owners occupy
the site without the lease being defined as a
subdivision
Allotments are too small and streets too It is agreed that the size of the allotments are small
narrow to allow service vehicles to operate although these are generally consistent with lot sizes
for this type of land use. 6.0 metres road widths, with
2 metre verges on each side, would generally be
adequate to enable service vehicle movement. It is
agreed that the narrow (3.5 – 4 metre) one-way
roadways are not acceptable as there would be issues
using driveways and garages.
No adequate outdoor recreation areas for Whilst no specific outdoor area has been created for
children children there is no requirement within the planning
scheme for one to be provided.
No external works are proposed to provide If the development were to be approved conditions
cycling/pedestrian connectivity to Cooroy could be included requiring pedestrian/cycling
connectivity.
Cooroy already has sufficient number of Council has undertaken a housing needs analysis
retirement facilities which has identified a need for additional aged care,
but this development does not satisfy this need.
Will negatively impact local fauna Development within the Riparian Buffer is a concern.
A residential development on this land would
decrease grazing areas for local fauna
Page 41 of 112
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.