Original source · versioned page text
16-001014-02A (Ultimate SCMMP)
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW16/0203 - 4 of 4.
The original of this document is very large (14.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
FAQs
• Can the boom become stuck? • Why is the HumeGard® GPT larger than other GPTs?
The smallest boom weighs 80 kg. Unless there is a The design of the HumeGard® GPT is to ensure a
large branch, car wheel, or other large item carried velocity through the treatment chamber <0.2 m/s
through the drainage network, the mass of the boom to ensure the comb self-cleans. From engineering
will ensure it returns to the floor. principles, a larger cross-sectional area is required to
reduce the loading rate. As proven by Stokes Law, lower
• Will the gross pollutants bypass when the
chamber velocities mean smaller sediment particles
boom floats?
can be captured.
All treatment measures are designed to treat a specific
flow. Once this is exceeded, any entrained pollutants • Why would I use a HumeGard® GPT upstream of
in the flow will bypass the treatment chamber. Often a biofilter?
this is less than 5% of the annual load. Unlike fixed Using a HumeGard® GPT upstream of a biofilter acts as
weir devices floating material is still retained behind a sediment forebay and removes litter, containing it to
the boom even during bypass. a confined location for easy removal by a vacuum truck.
This protects the biofilter, lengthens its lifespan and
• Will the retention of water in the treatment chamber
reduces the ongoing maintenance costs.
lead to the release of nutrients as pollutants
break down?
Over time, captured organic materials will breakdown
References
and release nutrients in all treatment measures
whether natural or manufactured. As part of a
• Waste Management Council of Victoria (1998) “Inline
treatment train, downstream vegetated measures
Litter Separator: Installation and Monitoring Project”,
can remove the small proportion of nutrients released
EcoRecycle, Victoria.
during dry weather flows. A regular maintenance
• Trinh, N. An Investigation into the Trapping Efficiencies
program will reduce the amount of breakdown
of Gross Pollutant Traps. Thesis. Brisbane, Queensland:
occurring.
Queensland University of Technology, 2007.
• What is the design life of a HumeGard® GPT? • Woods, S. Performance Evaluation of an In-Line
The entire product is designed to last a minimum of Separator. Masters Thesis. Melbourne, Victoria:
50 years. Swinburne University of Technology, 2005.
• Swinburne University of Technology (2000)
“HumeGard® In-line Litter Separator Sediment Capture
Testing”, School of Engineering and Science.
• Engineers Australia (2006) “Australian Runoff Quality”.
• Lucke, T. 2015, Characterisation of Water Quality
Improvement Processes by GPTs at University of
the Sunshine Coast (Humegard HG27 Monitoring
Program), School of Science and Engineering,
University of the Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia.
10 HumeGard® GPT
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.