Original source · versioned page text
16-001014-02A (Ultimate SCMMP)
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW16/0203 - 4 of 4.
The original of this document is very large (14.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Design Velocity Check Through Critical Section of WQCP
Filename: H:\B14\150-199\B14158.W\01 Final Layout Op Works\Checklists\[B14158.W_Riser Calc.xlsx]Crit. Section
Date: 5/09/2016
By: CM
Critical Section Through WQCP
1 to102.5
100 Y ARI
WSL (m) 100.28 m3/s
102
Basin Water Depth Above Extended Detention Depth (m) Cross Sectional Area (m2)
101.5 1 0.43 100.28 14.25
2 0.54 100.50 19.86
5 0.66 100.65 23.97
101
10 0.73 100.77 27.42
20 0.82 100.90 31.39
100.550 0.89 100.97 33.50
100 0.96 101.03 35.41
100
Extended Detention Depth
99.5 WSL (m) Design Channel
99
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Basin Water Depth Above Extended
AEP (%) Qin at B2 (m3/s) Cross Sectional Area (m2) Velocity (m/s)
Detention Depth (m)
63% 2.58 0.43 14.25 0.18
39% 2.97 0.54 19.86 0.15
18% 3.52 0.66 23.97 0.15
10% 3.96 0.73 27.42 0.14
5% 4.30 0.82 31.39 0.14
2% 4.64 0.89 33.63 0.14
1% 5.07 0.96 35.41 0.14
As indicated in the results, velocities range from 0.14m/s to 0.18m/s at the critical section. This is
only slightly above the velocity re‐suspension objective of 0.05m/s, but is well below the velocity
limits of 0.5m/s and 2.0m/s to protect against vegetation scour, as provided in Section 2.3.5 of the
WSUD Technical Design Guidelines (2006).
The following should also be considered:
As mentioned the velocity check equation indicated in WSUD Technical Design Guidelines
(2006) is determined based on outflow conditions. Our calculations have conservatively
considered basin inflow conditions.
The velocities determined do not take into account backwater effect caused by the outlet
that has been designed to restrict flows for detention. This will reduce velocities.
The velocities do not take into account the coincidence of flows from both that is expected
to reduce velocities further.
The results above demonstrate that the velocities through the WQCP are appropriate to avoid scour
and are unlikely to cause re‐suspension of stored pollutants.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.