Original source · versioned page text
Civil Engineering Cover Letter
Attached to the e-mail Response to Council information request - MCU16/0066 & OPW16/ 0133 - email 1 of 3.
Attached to the e-mail Response to SEQ Water Third Party Advice - MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133.
Response The resulting daily pollutant loads estimated by MUSIC modelling have been reduced significantly from the previous submission to best meet the water quality objectives for the surrounding waterways. The levels of reduction and estimated daily pollutants leaving the site have been provided to Seqwater during discussions. Refer to updated Stormwater Management Plan SMP for details of proposed treatment details 21. Information Required Demonstrate the development is consistent with the SeqWater Development Guidelines: Development Guidelines for Water Quality Management in Drinking Water Catchments 2012. Response Response: The third party advice from Seqwater dated 23rd August 2016 (CE:DB F16/3997) identified that they had reviewed the submitted SWMP against the development guidelines identified in Item 21 above. The only further information requested was the annual rainfall data used for modelling and a comparison of the daily pollutants loads leaving the site against the water quality objectives. The response to the third party advice from Seqwater is detailed separately within this letter. 22. Information Required Provide a preliminary drainage plan to demonstrate there is adequate grade between the underdrainage of the bioretention basin and receiving stormwater network. Response A stormwater management has been updated to demonstrate there is adequate grade between the underdrainage of the bioretention basin and receiving stormwater network. Refer to Plan SWMP01. 23. Information Required Demonstrate that the footprint allocated for the bioretention basin includes sufficient area for inclusion of batters from the surrounding area to the surface of the filter media consistent with the Water by Design Bioretention Basin Technical Design Guidelines (in particular Table 9). Response The inclusion of a rainwater tank to the site has enabled the bioretention basin to be made smaller and thus a batter can be constructed on the northern side of the basin to prevent a high drop from the retaining wall/kerb into the basin .The southern side of the basin remains a retaining wall. This arrangement is generally in accordance with the water by design guidelines. The set down to the basin surface is controlled by the proposed underground pipe network. 24. Information Required Demonstrate how the bioretention basin will be accessed for maintenance purposes. Response A maintenance access stairwell was indicated on the plans submitted with the initial application. This has been amended to include a maintenance access ramp suitable for access by a skidsteer loader. Refer to Plan SWMP02.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.