Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

OPW-Minor_Change_Req

of 3

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

For these reasons outlined above, it is considered that the proposed change constitutes a Minor Change to the
approved development. On this basis, it is considered that the request should be dealt with pursuant to the
provisions outlined within Section 81 of the Planning Act 2016.


Proceeding
We trust this correspondence provides you with sufficient information in relation to the proposal and we look
forward to receiving a positive decision from Council at your earliest convenience.

Should you have any further questions in relation to this matter, please feel free to contact me direct.

Yours faithfully,


ADAMS + SPARKES
TO WN P L ANN ING




Cameron Adams
MANAGING DIRECTOR


Encl:     Landscape Architect’s letter of support/response (Attachment 1).
          Revised Landscape Plans prepared by Andrew Gold Landscape Architect (Attachment 2)
          DA Form 5




                                                                                                           Page 3 of 3
Our ref: 230221
Log in to download the original file

OPW-Minor_Change_Req.pdf · 390 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.