Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - Existing_Acoustic_Environment (22.01.20)
MATTHEW PALAVIDIS
VICTOR FATTORETTO
MATTHEW SHIELDS
Noosa Civic
Existing Acoustic Environment
BRISBANE ABN 11 068 954 343
Level 1 www.acousticlogic.com.au
82 Arthur Street
FORTITUDE VALLEY QLD 4006
(07) 3211 5591
The information in this document is the property of Acoustic Logic Consultancy Pty Ltd ABN 11 068 954 343 and shall be returned
on demand. It is issued on the condition that, except with our written permission, it must not be reproduced, copied or
communicated to any other party nor be used for any purpose other than that stated in particular enquiry, order or contract with
which it is issued.
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.
Full text of the other 34 pages
Page 2
Project ID 20191414.1
Document Title Existing Acoustic Environment
Attention To Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
Attn:Harrison Hurst
Revision Date Document Reference Prepared By Checked By Approved
By
0 25/11/2019 20191414.1/2511A/R0/SS SS TS
1 3/12/2019 20191414.1/0312A/R1/SS SS TS
2 15/01/2020 20191414.1/1501A/R2/SS SS SS
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 2
Page 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 4 2 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 5 3 NOISE TARGETS....................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 ACOUSTIC DESCRIPTORS ................................................................................................ 6 3.2 TYPICAL NOISE TARGETS ................................................................................................ 7 3.2.1 Loading Dock Impacts (Trolley collection, mech. plant, compactor etc.) ........................ 7 3.2.2 Traffic......................................................................................................................................................... 7 4 NOISE MEASUREMENTS ......................................................................................................... 8 4.1 MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................... 8 4.2 MEASUREMENT LOCATION ............................................................................................ 8 4.3 MEASUREMENT PERIOD ................................................................................................. 9 4.4 MEASURED NOISE LEVELS .............................................................................................. 9 4.4.1 Unattended Measurements Results .............................................................................................. 9 4.4.2 Attended Measurement Results .................................................................................................. 10 5 NOISE SOURCES/IMPACTS ................................................................................................... 11 5.1 LOADING DOCKS ........................................................................................................... 11 5.1.1 Trolley Collection ............................................................................................................................... 11 5.1.2 Delivery Trucks.................................................................................................................................... 11 5.1.3 Mechanical Plant ................................................................................................................................ 11 5.1.4 Compactor............................................................................................................................................ 12 5.1.5 Preliminary Calculation .................................................................................................................... 12 5.2 TRAFFIC ........................................................................................................................... 12 6 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 13 APPENDIX A – PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAN ........................................................................ 14 APPENDIX B – UNATTENDED MEASUREMENT GRAPHED SUMMARY ................................... 15 NGARA ....................................................................................................................................... 16 RION-NL42 ................................................................................................................................ 24 I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 3
Page 4
1 INTRODUCTION
Acoustic Logic Consultancy (ALC) have been engaged to conduct noise monitoring to establish the existing
acoustic environment for proposed residential subdivision located Hofmann Drive, Noosaville and adjacent
to Noosa Civic shopping centre.
The purpose of this assessment is to establish the following:
• General acoustic environment of site location.
• Identifying main surrounding noise sources:
• Noosa Civic Shopping Centre Loading Docks
• Traffic Noise
The following sections of the report details the above. The intent of the report is not to provide detailed
design advice on how to mitigate the surrounding noise sources. Further analysis is required during next
phase, nominally prior to BA and Council approval of specific development, once the site plans and
apartment/house layouts are known to ensure the relevant noise limits can be met.
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 4
Page 5
2 SITE DESCRIPTION
The site comprising the proposed lots 17. 18, 19 and 21 is bound by the following:
• North, North-east - Noosa Civic Shopping Precinct
• West – Commercial precinct
• South - Townhouses across Hofmann Drive.
The loading docks are indicated in Figure 1 below.
LD 1
Woolworths
LD 2
W
LD 3
Big W
Site (Lots 17,18,19,21)
Noosa Civic Loading Docks
Figure 1 – Site Location
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 5
Page 6
3 NOISE TARGETS 3.1 ACOUSTIC DESCRIPTORS Environmental noise constantly varies. Accordingly, it is not possible to accurately determine prevailing environmental noise conditions by measuring a single, instantaneous noise level. To accurately determine the environmental noise a 15-20 minute measurement interval is utilised. Over this period, noise levels are monitored on a continuous basis and statistical and integrating techniques are used to determine noise description parameters. In analysing environmental noise, three-principle measurement parameters are used, namely L10, L90 and Leq. The L10 and L90 measurement parameters are statistical levels that represent the average level generally used to determine traffic/entertainment noise and average minimum noise levels respectively, over the measurement intervals. The L10 parameter is commonly used to measure noise produced by a particular intrusive noise source since it represents the average of the loudest noise levels produced by the source. Conversely, the L90 level (which is commonly referred to as the background noise level) represents the noise level heard in the quieter periods during a measurement interval. The L90 parameter is used to set the allowable noise level for new, potentially intrusive noise sources since the disturbance caused by the new source will depend on how audible it is above the pre-existing noise environment, particularly during quiet periods, as represented by the L90 level. The Leq parameter represents the average noise energy during a measurement period. This parameter is derived by integrating the noise levels measured over the 15 minute period. Leq is important in the assessment of traffic noise impact as it closely corresponds with human perception of a changing noise environment; such is the character of environmental noise. I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 6
Page 7
3.2 TYPICAL NOISE TARGETS
In the absence of Council Conditions of Consent, the following are referenced for information as typical
noise targets.
3.2.1 Loading Dock Impacts (Trolley collection, mech. plant, compactor etc.)
Table 1 – EPP Noise 2008, Schedule 1 - Acoustic Quality Objectives for Residential
Sensitive Time of Day Criteria (measured at the receptor)
receptor dB(A)
LAeq,adj,1hr1 LA1,adj,1hr2
daytime and evening 35 45
dwelling (indoors) (habitable spaces)
night-time (sleeping areas) 30 40
1
Acoustic descriptor/noise target for continuous noise sources (e.g. mechanical plant).
2
Acoustic descriptor/noise target for transient impacts arising from loading dock activities (e.g. truck
movements, reversing alarms, compactor, trolley etc.).
3.2.2 Traffic
Generally, the traffic noise impacts onto residential buildings are assessed against indoor noise targets given
in Australian Standard AS 2107-2016 as shown in Table 2. The table references houses and apartments near
major roads. Near minor roads, the targets would be 5dB(A) below the upper limit.
Table 2 -AS 2107 Recommended Design Sound Levels for Residential
Type of occupancy/activity Indoor Noise Limit, Leq,T
(dBA)
Living and Work areas 35 to 45
Sleeping areas (night time) 35 to 40
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 7
Page 8
4 NOISE MEASUREMENTS
4.1 MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT
Unattended noise monitoring was conducted using a NGARA noise monitor and a Rion Sound Level Meter
NL-42. Both loggers were programmed to store 15-minute statistical noise levels throughout the monitoring
period.
Attended noise measurements were conducted using a Norsonics NOR140 Precision Sound Level Analyser
set to A-weighted fast response. The equipment was calibrated at the beginning and end of the
measurement period, no significant drift was recorded.
4.2 MEASUREMENT LOCATION
Monitor locations were selected upon accessibility and accuracy in considering ambient conditions whilst
capturing dominant noise sources around site.
3
NGARA
6 Mech. plant deck
4
2 1
RION NL 42
5
N
Unattended Attended
Figure 2- Noise Measurement Locations
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 8
Page 9
The NGARA monitor was placed at the boundary of site and ‘western loading dock’ to capture operational
noise from loading docks 1 to 3 for supermarkets such as Woolworths and Big W. Whilst the Rion NL42 was
set-up at the boundary of ‘eastern loading dock’ denoted as loading docks 4 to 6 (Figure 1).
Short-term attended measurements were carried out at various locations within the loading docks to capture
transient (reverse signals, truck movements, trolley’s) and stationary/continuous noise sources (mechanical
plant).
4.3 MEASUREMENT PERIOD
Unattended monitoring was conducted from the 20th of November to the 27th of November 2019 (incl.) with
both monitors operating simultaneously. Periods of extraneous weather that occurred during the
measurement period have been removed from the data.
Attended measurements were conducted on the 20th and 27th of November 2019 upon set-up of the loggers.
Data was neglected for periods of extraneous weather that have occurred during measurement period.
4.4 MEASURED NOISE LEVELS
4.4.1 Unattended Measurements Results
Table 3 -NGARA Measurement Summary
Date Average Acoustic Descriptor, dB(A)
Leq L90 L10 L1
D* E* N* D* E* N* D* E* N* D* E* N*
20/11/19 59 48 48 57 45 42 60 50 50 61 53 53
21/11/19 57 52 50 55 50 45 59 54 51 61 56 54
22/11/19 58 48 48 56 44 43 59 50 49 61 53 53
23/11/19 58 52 48 56 46 43 59 54 49 60 56 53
24/11/19 58 45 49 56 42 43 59 46 50 60 48 54
25/11/19 59 49 50 57 45 46 60 50 51 62 53 54
26/11/19 59 48 48 57 46 44 60 50 50 62 52 54
27/11/19 59 57 61 63
AVERAGE 58 49 49 56 45 44 60 50 50 61 53 54
* D- Day (7:00-18:00), E- Evening (18:00 – 22:00), N-Night (22:00-7:00)
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 9
Page 10
Table 4 -Rion NL42 Measurement Summary Date Average Acoustic Descriptor, dB(A) Leg Loo Lio Li D* E* N* D* E* N* D* E* N* D* E* N* 20/11/19 54 48 44 51 46 37 56 50 | 46 66 56 59 21/11/19 52 49 44 49 46 36 53 50 | 46 66 59 61 22/11/19 52 49 44 49 46 36 53 50 | 45 66 60 61 23/11/19 52 48 44 49 46 35 54 | 49 | 46 66 58 60 24/11/19 53 48 43 49 45 36 56 50 | 45 67 58 61 25/11/19 52 49 43 49 46 37 54 51 45 66 61 61 26/11/19 57 51 44 52 47 37 59 54 46 70 59 60 27/11/19 54 51 56 67 AVERAGE 53 49 44 50 46 36 55 51 46 67 59 60 * D- Day (7:00-18:00), E- Evening (18:00 — 22:00), N-Night (22:00-7:00) 4.4.2 Attended Measurement Results Table 5 -Loading Dock Activity, Attended Measurements Location’ Noise Source Acoustic Descriptor, dB(A) Leq Lmax Lpeak 1 Mechanical plant deck @ 25 57 62 78 metres 2 Reversing signal from trolley 69 76 83 collection truck 3 Mechanical plant noise 71 73 85 through exhaust/grille @ 1 metre away ' Refer to Figure 2 for location on map. I\obs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx
Page 11
Table 6 -Traffic, Attended Measurements
Location Noise Source Acoustic Descriptor, dB(A)
Leq L10 L90
4 Traffic (Hofmann Rd. near 54 55 51
roundabout)
5 Ambient1 (Hofmann Rd.) 51 50 47
6 Traffic (Rene St.) 63 68 55
1
Intent was to record traffic noise level, however due to little to no traffic on Hofmann Road, the levels
recorded do not represent accurately traffic noise levels which can be emitted once the road is used.
Hofmann Rd traffic is currently only generated by one small residential development and leads to a dead
end.
5 NOISE SOURCES/IMPACTS
The following sections outline current major noise sources that were identified upon site visit to have
potential impact on site.
5.1 LOADING DOCKS
5.1.1 Trolley Collection
During time on site, it was observed that trolley activity is a regular occurrence across both loading docks.
Noise level that was measured in relation to noise produced by trolley activity was 69 dB(A) Leq.
Trolley collection would unlikely occur at night time, however, the façade of the residential buildings must
be designed to ensure compliance with relevant indoor noise limits during periods of trolley collection hours.
Further investigation is required during detailed design phase of the proposal prior to DA submission for
the specific site, based on actual site plans, building and room layouts.
5.1.2 Delivery Trucks
It was observed that small to medium sized delivery trucks were present within the loading docks during
time of site visit. We note that the loading dock operational hours as per installed signage start at 5AM
(based on Woolworths, unknown for others) and on that basis, night time loading dock noise impacts and
sleep disturbance assessment or compliance with Acoustic Quality Objectives is required once the residential
development site plans are known. Acoustic review of façade treatment is required to ensure acceptable
impacts indoors, unless external noise compliance with Acoustic Quality Objectives can be achieved.
Among other requirements, we note that the windows and doors would need to be in a closed position (and
appropriately acoustically rated) to achieve indoor noise limits. On that basis, alternative ventilation would
be required for the noise affected rooms to achieve adequate ventilation.
5.1.3 Mechanical Plant
The following mechanical plant was observed and noted in Figure 2.
• Eastern Loading Dock Plant deck above loading dock ‘5’ emitting a calculated sound power level
of 93dB(A).
• Western Loading Dock - Plant room/exhaust adjacent loading dock ‘2’ were measured and
calculated to have a sound power level 90 dB(A).
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 11
Page 12
Once the site plans are known, we recommend carrying our detailed assessment to ensure that the noise
impacts to the proposed residential buildings are controlled to acceptable limits (e.g. adequate façade
design). Rooftop and other mechanical plant was not accessed during our visit and therefore must be further
reviewed during detailed design of the proposed residential buildings to ensure that indoor noise limits are
achieved.
5.1.4 Compactor
A compactor was noticed located by the ‘Big W’ loading dock 3. Compactor operation would unlikely occur
during night time period. In any case the façade treatment of the proposed residential development must
be designed to ensure compliance with relevant indoor noise limits during periods of compactor operation
hours. Detailed assessment is required during next phase of the project when plans of the buildings are
known.
5.1.5 Preliminary Calculation
A preliminary calculation has been conducted for a typical bedroom which suggests minimum Rw 35
glazing/façade treatment can likely be expected to ameliorate impacts to achieve typical noise levels
outlined in Section 3.2. The following was considered in the preliminary review:
• Impacts/Noise sources from ‘western’ loading dock.
- Mechanical Plant: 69 dB(A) Leq measured at 4 metres
- Truck Pass-by: 3 trucks every hour (day-time) and 1 truck in an hour at night at a sound
pressure level at 96 dB(A) Leq.. Trucks at least 10 metres from facade
- Truck reversing with alarm: 3 trucks every hour (day-time) and 1 truck every hour (night) at
a sound pressure level at 100 dB(A) Leq
- Reverse alarm (trucks): 100 dB(A) Lw with no reversing closer than 10 metres of facade;
Trolley Collection: 90dB(A)Lw with the collection no closer than 20 metres.
- Compactor: 94 dB(A) Leq Sound power level,, located at 10metres from facade
• Façade line of proposed residential development approximately 2 metres from loading dock
boundary.
• Assessed habitable space taken as a typical bedroom with a floor area of 9m2.
• Typical façade/glazing area of typical bedroom – 3*2.7 metres.
Please note that these calculations and suggestions are only preliminary to indicate that with appropriate
façade acoustic design, it is possible to achieve indoor noise targets without the installation of noise barrier.
Thereby further assessment of façade is required during detailed design phase to ensure appropriate façade
treatments ensure that the proposed development achieves relevant noise targets such as those outlined in
Section 3.2, or as otherwise requested by the local Council.
5.2 TRAFFIC
Upon site inspection, traffic noise from Hofmann Drive was minimal during time of site visit. As it appears
that road expansions of Hofmann Drive connecting to Walter Hay Drive is possible, considerations to future
traffic impacts should be made. Future traffic flow information or predictions should be obtained and
observed in order to predict accurate traffic noise impacts. Adequate façade acoustic treatment must be
determined once this information is known.
In addition, traffic impacts were measured on Rene Street on the 27 th November 2019. Rene Street being
surrounded by commercial district is a busier road and thereby having more traffic activity. Noise level
recorded was Leq 63 dB(A),1hr,day. This level could be a potential indication of traffic impacts onto site as the
result of a Hofmann Road expansion, however, must be confirmed once the traffic flow data is known.
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 12
Page 13
6 CONCLUSION ALC have conducted noise monitoring at the proposed subdivision site on Hofmann Road for lots 17, 18, 19 & 21. Noise monitoring data has assisted in establishing the acoustic environment associated to the subject site (Table 1 and 2). Once the residential site layouts are known, we recommend carrying out a detailed assessment to ensure that the identified noise sources are adequately addressed and acoustic treatment to façades applied to ensure compliance with indoor noise levels. Where compliance with outdoor noise targets would be required, these must also be addressed in due course. We understand that it may be required to erect a noise barrier along the boundary to the Western loading dock area. Given that the buildings are likely higher than a typical noise barrier, the effectiveness of the noise barrier may be limited due to upper levels likely overlooking the loading dock in any case. On that basis, we recommend Council to set a Condition based on noise limits and request to submit a noise impact assessment report at the time when the specific development application is made for each residential building separately. This allows each proposed future building to adopt adequate façade acoustic design based on the specific layouts and elevations proposed, or combine a noise barrier with acoustic façade treatment, whichever is more feasible. We trust this information is satisfactory. Please contact us should you have any further queries. Yours faithfully, Acoustic Logic Consultancy Pty Ltd Sanjin Skavo I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 13
Page 14
APPENDIX A – PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAN I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 14
Page 15
6S 68EVEO
SJON3Y43I3Y NVId
OOO? +I saves
OZ /IO/4 ;
2}0q pafouddy
6rEBErEO any
no“woo'skanins}q:° MMM / / 2d}, 4
vyvS BEZE (40) eu0Ud
ZOl¥ 0 Dqqobuoo 00m
‘POOY YO!MSG] QO!
22! LO€ €SO ‘NOV
“‘Buruudjg uMo, ‘buiddow
‘Buryndwog ‘Kydos60y409 ‘buikaauns
a/4 ‘ed DH Nd SIOUBI4 » }ouueg
dd pdiedug
‘a4IUS DSOON :A}OU NY [D907
‘youop yo Ayunog
‘UIJUDMA] JO YSIDd
‘OBEHOW YO GZ 307 |OULBO
‘y8S9v2dS UO € 307 BulljaoUD9
Cc BIL
$}0] Ul S}UDUBAOD PUD Z ‘GI—I| ‘v—|
SIIIACSOON ‘OIAID ESOON
yoaloig
PI Aid dnolg
jusWdojenagq ||JeMy490}S
60 OIEZEO UOId siduD44 7 }}9UUag
WOd} Pa|!dWOD UO!}OWOJ Ul 41NO}UOD
‘Kaains 0} yOafqns si pud sajiy
ubisap Woy palidwod ynNoKo| JO] BA!1}ODIPU]
“LEIVLZS| Woy palidwios
24D pud| Jaf qns ay} JO SaluDpUNOg
‘M4 $}07] Ul S}UaWAaSDF ‘yZ—12 ‘61-1 $}O1
02/10/51 aj0q dq umoig 49 NOISIAIGENS GSSOd0ud UBIO
Qy
=é
g ES “Nay
Nn 8 Wy 9
Y § ~*s 4 N 3
g _— > X nS 3
. pb fO y N S
PEZLL/ yy, 0 & &
So
750
wo
oO
46
wo
oO
a0
t+
5 XY
é 48 §
5 S x
2 aS a
= o € G
40
a |" ‘us S
2 Is *<
e498 d
a y
a :
= le »
e1a °
o “ @.
4 ec
1 13 2s
a ui ™~ s ©
2 PS
g 8 ens
48 x &
7 g
2 5 ~
gfe g
a |° ‘
\ a
GK
42 ~ x gx«ek
& 8 B SN9
y < 8 O88
N ao
WoO Q & 4 BN
as” 8 of
q i % YR
de NS 8 7 of <8 .
re} 5 Q PHRE TOO NX € Q te,
. N
qo AVIOH 5 WS . ~ Ly ®
a LT. 5 ow®
v on N LS INFY Fm 8 g N
yy x x/ R Log Ni
x of ¥ d vu gs
x x N S we ye € x & 4
8 V [SS y N
| ei | ____- Og a N s Ws
86S ESb OFF 6F NEY
5/2U014 puo }}aUUEg
pansases 5461 10202 ©
vi
jo] yeeus
J -
3
SP264847
Page 16
3
+ bag
% S82 Lut ! ! L L L L L
BSS 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
aA] sss : .
5 |S S gs Ss
ae 2 °
2% £2 go. DIAGRAM A
we
Oo . 8502 gy __ Scale 1:2000
i a : - 5 0
OF : rr
33°46'45""s, e p08
12:428 ev] w1909
ge5t'35" acne Bel Mie eg ey ee, 192°20'05"
12-535 "8-566
: 040' 39"
| ele 7
"2060
4.9:
gp Ase
N Cov. J
.. SPIB2BAS
os Bre,
oS , ot;
2 bad ", ee
: Nz . *
- Boy & “2
a om tS So,
<M 0 8 a
au ae
g
: Cov./
2.
a. BZ SP182845
CP any,
sp285856 ZG ZEMT AO
Scale 1:2000 — Lengths are in Metres.
| | | | | J EMT AD
1622 m2
EMT AW SP222982
5 Dae L59 m2
2473 mes
Part
EMT AX
1675 m2
SP182845
3
SP1I82845 /
ne l & proposed
- Covenant AR
956m2
“EMT AY
160 =—:180
2 R20 240 260 7 5 me
SS Q 7
See Diagr am E
034389.59
~
hn)
lay
I~
Gy
Plan Ref.
(including
Existing Covenan
Cov.J”
SP182845
Proposed
Covenant AJ
3260 m?
Prop osed
. Covenant AU
Proposed 3E9 m2
Covenant AT
485 mn
Proposed
b"Covenant AS
732 m2
DIAGRAM B
Scale 1:2000
@
a
*
Boundaries of the subject land are
compiled from [S274197.
Indicative lot layout compiled from design
files and is subject to survey.
Contour Information compiled from
Bennett &Francis plan 032310.09
Contour Interval = 0:5m
344 m2
Page 17
4
reserved.
of
3
Sheet
oS
82
gee Emt.W
ses RP844425
Ses 33 m2
USS :
gat :
DIAGRAM C
Scale 1:2000
ae
Emt.£ °
SP167978
618 m2
DIAGRAM E
Scale 1:1000
SE
>
we Wy Drv EMT AD ><.
7om2
Cov.!
SPIEZB45
~
EmtM
SPI92396
Proposed
Covenant AG
4567 m2
034389.59
Plan Ref.
(266.226)
EmtD
+ RPI77294
"55 L5 m2
Proposed .
Covenant AH *"""
2805 m2
Te 147
NPW889
®
5
R
wv
10
EmtU
SP182880
SP1I82845
715 m2
Emt S$
SP182880.
EMT AA
DIAGRAM D
Scale 1:1000
Boundaries of the subject land are
compiled from 1S274197.
Indicative lot layout compiled from design
files and is subject to survey.
Contour Information compiled from
353 m2 Sh <>, Bennett & Francis plan 032310.09
mm i. Sp hin Contour Interval = Im
Se
> 5
A Se Soe
Qe. e
Page 18
of Sheet 4/4 © 2020ANl rights reserved. Bennett and Francis ABN 49 446 453 598 Plan Ref. 034389.59 Proposed Easements Proposed Covenants Lot 1 Easement AA is a vehicular access easement over the existing private road and will benefit | Nil proposed Lots 2 and 22 Easement AC is a vehicular access easement providing service vehicle access over the existing driveway and will benefit proposed Lots 2 and 22 Easement AE is vehicular access easement providing service vehicle access and will benefit proposed Lots 2 and 22 Easement AM is a pedestrian access easement and will benefit proposed lot 3 and 4 Easement AN is a pedestrian access easement and will benefit proposed lot 3 and 4 Lot 2 Easement AD is a vehicular access easement over the existing service vehicle access and | Nil will benefit proposed lots 1 and 22 Lot 3 Easement AL is a 4 metre wide pedestrian access easement burdening Lot 3 and will benefit | Nil proposed lots 1, 4 and Noosa Shire Council Easement AK is a vehicular access easement over the new North-South Link Road and will benefit proposed lots 6,7, 8 and 9. Easement AP is a vehicular access easement and will benefit proposed lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 Lot 4 Easement AO is a pedestrian access easement for new private road B and will benefit | Nil proposed lots 3, 1 and Noosa Shire Council Lot 5 Nil Nil Lot 6 Nil Nil Lot 7 Nil Proposed Covenant AJ is Open Space for the purpose of preservation of visual amenity* Lot 8 Nil Proposed Covenant AU is Open Space for the purpose of preservation of visual amenity* Lot 9 Nil Proposed Covenant AT is Open Space for the purpose of preservation of visual amenity* Lot 10 Nil Proposed Covenant AS is Open Space for the purpose of preservation of visual amenity* Lot 11 Easement AY is a vehicular access easement for emergency fire vehicle access only, and | Proposed Covenant AR is Open Space for the purpose of will benefit proposed lot 1, 12,13,14 and 15 and will be managed by Lot 1 preservation of visual amenity* Lot 12 Easement AX is a stormwater and vehicular access easement for cars, emergency | Nil firefighting appliances and car parking benefiting proposed Lots 1, 11, 13, 14 and 15 and will be managed by Lot 1 Lot 13 Easement AW is a stormwater and vehicular access easement for cars, emergency | Nil firefighting appliances and car parking benefiting proposed Lots 1,11,12, 14,15 and will be managed by lot 1 Easement AZ is a stormwater easement and will benefit proposed Lot 14 Lot 14 Easement AV is a stormwater and vehicular access easement for cars and emergency | Nil firefighting appliances and car parking benefiting proposed Lots 1,11,12, 13, 15 and will be managed by Lot 1 Lot 15 Easement AQ is a stormwater and vehicular access easement for cars and emergency | Nil firefighting appliances and car parking benefiting proposed Lots 1, 11,12,13,14 and will be managed by Lot 1. Lot 16 Nil Nil Lot 17 Nil Nil Lot 18 Nil Nil Lot 19 Nil Nil Lot 21 Nil Nil Lot 22 Easement AB is a vehicular access easement over the existing access driveway and will | Nil benefit proposed Lots 1 and 2. Lot 23 Nil Covenant AG is for the purpose of a building exclusion zone to mitigate bushfire risk Covenant AH is Open Space for the purpose of visual amenity* Lot 24 Nil Nil As per terms of existing Covenant | on Lot 2 on SP182845 *
Page 19
APPENDIX B – UNATTENDED MEASUREMENT GRAPHED SUMMARY I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 15
Page 20
NGARA I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 16
Page 21
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 17
Page 22
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 18
Page 23
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 19
Page 24
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 20
Page 25
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 21
Page 26
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 22
Page 27
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 23
Page 28
RION-NL42
L1
I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 24
Page 29
L1 I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 25
Page 30
L1 I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 26
Page 31
L1 I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 27
Page 32
L1 I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 28
Page 33
L1 I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 29
Page 34
L1 I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 30
Page 35
L1 I:\Jobs\2019\20191414\20191414.1\20200115SSA_R2_Existing_Acoustic_Environment.docx 31