Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

20517 App Q.pdf [As Published] · 132007.1259

of 91

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

 

BIODIVERSITY OVERLAY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS

Noosa Shire;

+ It is rare or naturally restricted regionally or
locally, as identified in Vegetation of Noosa | d)
Shire; or

+ The extent reserved within protected areas in
Noosa Shire is ‘low’, as identified in Vegetation
of Noosa Shire.

is reasonably necessary for access to the
building or structure; or
for freehold lots greater than 0.3ha and
less than 10 ha—interference with vegetation
does not extend beyond 10m of a building or
structure where the interference is reasonably
necessary for access to the building or
structure; or :

for freehold lots 10ha or more—

interference with vegetation does not 10m of a

structure where the interference is reasonably

necessary for the control of fire risk to the
building or structure; or

for freehold lots less than 10ha where—

i. located within an area identified as a
Bushfire Hazard Area on the Natural
Hazards Overlay Maps OM1.4- OM9.4;
and

ii. an on site assessment in accordance with
Australian Standard AS3959 confirms the
site is within a Medium or High Bushfire
Hazard Area— interference with
vegetation does not extend beyond 10m
of a building or structure or a distance
equal to 1.5 times the predominant
mature canopy tree height, whichever is
the greater.

03 Vegetation is protected from any adverse | $3.1 No solution provided

impacts of development (edge effects) and
fragmentation by being maintained in manageable
and viable configurations,

04 Wetlands are protected from removal or | $4.1 A minimum separation distance of 100m is
degradation and any adverse impacts on wetlands | provided between a wetland and any adjacent
are prevented, minimised or mitigated by— development or use.

a) maintaining adequate separation between the
wetland and any adjacent development or use9;

 

 

SOLUTIONS”

AIS

 

ee) aS)

The proposed vegetation buffer covers the entire length of the
western boundary with no development to occur within this buffer,
which removes any fragmentation of the vegetation. Refer to
Appendix M - Ecological Assessment

 

a pmm

yy ent

COUNCIL USE ONLY

 

 

4 Solution: | ~ = Acceptable Solution
AIS = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal

20517 - Essence of Peregian

Appendix Q

20517_BiodiversityCode_FINAL_mrc.doc

Page 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
6.8 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

20517 App Q.pdf [As Published].pdf · 6.8 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.