Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

3018 AppendixD

of 15

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

ll

APPENDIX D
Site Classification Reports of Proposed Lots 11 & 12

prepared by Global Testing

ll
Log in to download the original file

3018 AppendixD.pdf · 7.9 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 14 pages

Page 2

GLOBAL TESTING

THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS

 

QBCC Licence No. 1018403

PH: 07 54 740 900

3/53 Gateway Drive, Noosaville 4566
Email: [email protected]

 

| 20/0611-2__ SITE CLASSIFICATION REPORT

| LYNDALL PETERSEN.

PROPOSED SUBDIVISION & PROPOSED FUTURE RESIDENCE,
PROPOSED LOT 11 (No.130) LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE,
COOROY.

E | 11/06/2021

 

 

1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to classify the subject allotment in accordance with Australian
Standard 2870 - 2011 'Residential Slabs and Footings’. From this classification, a footing
system can be recommended for the structure so as to allow adequate performance of the
footings under the soil conditions determined at the site.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type of Allotment Residential
Vegetation (Building Envelope) Grassed
Vegetation (Allotment) Grassed, scattered undergrowth, scattered
large trees.
Road Status Sealed
Slope 22% Towards the West
Surface Water will Drain Towards West
Will Surface Water from adjoining Yes
allotments traverse this site?
Does the site have any watercourses Yes-Dam downhill.
Surrounding Allotments
Left Acreage
Right Acreage
Rear Acreage
Depth to Weathered Rock 4.0m (BH6 & BH7)
Depth to Water Table N/a

 

3. SITE CLASSIFICATION AND TARGET STRATA

Based on the findings of the site investigation, the classification of the site is considered to
conform to:

CLASS “ P ” ( Due to poor bearing capacity-See Target
Stratum).
(Please note: If not for the poor bearing capacity, this site has the
characteristics of an ‘M?’ site)

in accordance with Australian Standard 2870 - 2011, 'Residential Slabs and Footings,
Construction’.

The Target Stratum for the foundation of the structure located at BH6 is the SILTY
SANDY CLAY at a depth of 1200mm below existing ground level.

Page | 1 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-2

 

Page 3

The Target Stratum for the foundation of the structure located at BH7 is the SILTY
SANDY CLAY at a depth of 1200mm below existing ground level.

It is the designing engineer’s responsibility to address the potential influence of any trees
present on or around the proposed building site.

If any fill is placed over the existing ground, the structure shall be piered through the fill
into the existing material. Further note that the placement of reactive material as fill or
cutting of the site may change the site’s classification.

PLEASE NOTE: This report does not address slope stability. If a slope stability analysis
is required, the services of a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer should be sought.

4. SOIL PROFILE
Refer to Soil Profile Report for borelog information
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the borelogs carried out at the subject allotment
are indicative of the soil profile over the site any discrepancy between the profile detailed in
the borelogs and that observed during construction shall be referred to Global Testing for
immediate attention.

5. MATERIALS LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

Soil Laboratory testing carried out on samples of the soil taken from the site gave the following

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

results:
BOREHOLE BH6
DEPTH RANGE OF SAMPLE 300-600mm
LIQUID LIMIT (%) NE
PLASTIC LIMIT (%) N/a
PLASTIC INDEX (%) Nia
LINEAR SHRINKAGE (%) N/a
INSTABILITY INDEX (%) Nia
SHRINK SWELL INDEX, Iss (%) 2.6
PREDICTED SURFACE MOVEMENT Nia

 

Please note that the Plasticity Index (PI) determined by the Atterberg Test may be correlated to
an Instability Index (Ips)with reference to the results of extensive testing carried out by others,
notably, Dr P Mitchell, ‘Footings for Small Scale Domestic Structures,’ March 1990.

Yours Sincerely,

f

i

MICHAEL PINKNEY. (Laboratory Manager)

Page | 2 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-2

Page 4

LIMITATIONS

Recommendations given in this report are based on the information supplied by the client
regarding the proposed building construction in conjunction with the findings of the
investigation. Any change in construction type, building location or omission in the client
supplied information, may require additional testing and/or make the recommendations
invalid.

The recommendations herein identify a target soil stratum into which the footings are to be
founded. The target stratum has been located by the depth in mm of the target stratum’s upper
horizon boundary below the existing ground surface level at the time of the site investigation.
Any cutting or filling works and any surface erosion or deposits subsequent to the site
investigation, will alter the measured location of the stratum relative to the surface. Where
required, the author should be notified in such cases to confirm the location of the target
stratum.

The description of the soil given in the Soil Profile section of this report is intended as a brief
overview of the soil's primary constituents. For a detailed classification of the soil, the reader
should refer to the Soil Profile Reports and/or Borehole Reports attached to this report.

Every reasonable effort has been made to locate the test sites so that the borehole profiles are
representative of the soil conditions within the area investigated. The client should be made
aware however, that exploration is limited by time available and economic restraints. In some
cases, soil conditions can change dramatically over short distances, therefore, even careful
exploration programs may not locate all the variations.

If soil conditions different from those shown in this report are encountered or are inferred
from other sources, then the author must be notified immediately.

This report may not be reproduced except in full. The information and drawings provided
with this report shall only be used and will only be applicable for the development shown on
the client supplied information provided for this site.

Any dimensions, contours, slope directions and magnitudes shown on the Test Locality Plan
shall not be used for any building construction or costing calculations. The purpose of the
plan is to show approximate location of field tests only.

Any changes made to these recommendations by persons unauthorised by the author will
legally be interpreted as that person assuming the responsibility for the long-term
performance of the footing system.

The recommendations contained in this report have not taken into consideration the long-term
effects of any previous, current or potential subsurface work by mining companies or
potential slope instability problems. At the time of writing this report neither our client (nor
his agent) nor the local authority had made the author aware that these problems may be
affecting this allotment. If a mining subsidence or slope stability assessment is required for
this allotment, the recommendations of a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer should be

sought.

Page | 3 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-2

Page 5

 

GLOBAL TESTING

 

THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOIL PROFILE REPORT
CLIENT: Lyndal Petersen AUTHORISED __Lyndal Petersen
BY:
PROJECT: Proposed Lot 11 (No.130) DATE TESTED: 24/05/2021
Lake Macdonald Drive,
Cooroy.
JOB NO: 21/0611-2
Drilling Method: Jacro 105 100mm. Borehole
No.6
Depth Description PENET. Est. Bearing
(mm) (blows per 100mm) Capacity
| (kPa)
3 4) 5| 6
0 SANDY CLAY (CL)- Low plasticity, grey/
brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, firm.
100 2 25
200 2
300 SILTY SANDY CLAY (CI) Medium
plasticity, pale brown, fine to coarse sand,
trace of gravel, moist, firm.
400 2
500 2 25
600 2
700 2
800 2
900 SILTY SANDY CLAY (CI) Medium 4 125
plasticity, pale brown, fine to coarse sand,
trace of gravel, moist, stiff.
1000 6 >200
1100 9
1200 SILTY SANDY CLAY (CI) Medium 10
plasticity, pale brown, fine to coarse sand,
trace of gravel, moist, very stiff.
1300 13
1400 14
1500 15
1600 15
1700
2000
2800
3200 SANDY CLAY (CL)- Low plasticity, pale
brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, hard.
(Becoming Extremely Weathered Rock)
3400
3500
3600
3700
4000 ROCK - Auger Refusal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page | 4 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code

21/0611-2

 

Page 6

GLOBAL TESTING

THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOIL PROFILE REPORT
CLIENT: Lyndal Petersen AUTHORISED _Lyndal Petersen
BY:
PROJECT: Lot 11 (130) Lake DATE TESTED: 24/05/2021
Macdonald Drive, Cooroy.
JOB NO: 21/0611-2
Drilling Method: Jacro 105 100mm. Borehole
No.7
Depth Description PENET. Est. Bearing
(mm) (blows per 100mm) Capacity
(kPa)
3 4 5) 6
0 SANDY CLAY (CL)- Low plasticity, grey/
brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, firm.
100 2 25
200 2
300 SILTY SANDY CLAY (CI) Medium 1
plasticity, pale brown, fine to coarse sand,
trace of gravel, moist, firm.
400 2 25
500 2
600 2
700 2 25
800 SILTY SANDY CLAY (CI) Medium 4 125
plasticity, pale brown, fine to coarse sand,
trace of gravel, moist, stiff.
900 5
1000 6 >200
1100 7
1200 SILTY SANDY CLAY (CD Medium 10
plasticity, pale brown, fine to coarse sand,
trace of gravel, moist, very stiff.
1300 15
1400 18
1500 18
1600 18
1700 18
1800
1900
2000
3000
3200 SANDY CLAY (CL)- Low plasticity, pale
brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, hard.
(Becoming Extremely Weathered Rock)
3400
3800
4000 ROCK — Auger Refusal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page | 5 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-2

Page 7

GLOBAL TESTING

THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS

 

 

Site- Lot 11 (No. 130) Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy

Page | 6 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-2

 

Page 8

 

 

ONDA) Sez}8u UI SUOISLIBULIP {fy AjUe $}58}
iso UoReIOoIed ~ td = Poy 8] JO UONedO| eyeuxosdde 9yj MOYs 0] SI UBId ey} Jo esodNd ey 4 “SUOHEIND}e9 HuN}SOd Jo UOTJONIySUOD BuIpjINg

UOHESO™ 19 jJSWONSUS,g GUCD s1weuUukg - Nd ’ i"
UOhEIe7 sjouysiog - He -—p Aue Jo} pesn eq jou |!eUS UBId 84) UO UMOYs SepnylubeW pue SUONoeLIp ado}s 'sunoUOD 'sUOISUeLUID Auly 9jON
GN3934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

00ST ATVOS Yasiajeg [epuATy : JuaT{D Ao.100D ald pleuopoeyAl 2Ye'T (OETON) TT 30°] pasodo.rg : 1G 1Z0Z/SO/PT :P99S9,L 218 Z-1190/1Z 2ON Gor

Page 9

GLOBAL TESTING

THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS

 

QBCC Licence No. 1018403
PH: 07 54 740 900

3/53 Gateway Drive, Noosaville 4566
Email: [email protected]

 

_| 21/0611-1 SITE CLASSIFICATION REPORT

_| LYNDALL PETERSEN.

PROPOSED SUBDIVISION & PROPOSED FUTURE RESIDENCE,
PROPOSED LOT 12 (No.130) LAKE MACDONALD DRIVE,

| COOROY.

| 11/06/2021

  
  
  
   

 

 

 

1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to classify the subject allotment in accordance with Australian
Standard 2870 - 2011 'Residential Slabs and Footings’. From this classification, a footing
system can be recommended for the structure so as to allow adequate performance of the
footings under the soil conditions determined at the site.

2. SITE DESCRIPTION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type of Allotment Residential
Vegetation (Building Envelope) Grass
Vegetation (Allotment) Grass, scattered undergrowth, scattered large
trees.
Road Status Sealed
Slope 18% towards the west
Surface Water will Drain Towards West
Will Surface Water from adjoining Yes
allotments traverse this site?
Does the site have any watercourses Yes-Dam downhill.
Surrounding Allotments
Left Acreage
Right Acreage
Rear Acreage
Depth to Weathered Rock N/a
Depth to Water Table N/a

 

 

 

3. SITE CLASSIFICATION AND TARGET STRATA

Based on the findings of the site investigation, the classification of the site is considered to
conform to:

CLASS “ M ” ( See Target Stratum).

in accordance with Australian Standard 2870 - 2011, 'Residential Slabs and Footings,
Construction’.

The Target Stratum for the foundation of the structure located at BH1 is the SANDY
CLAY at a depth of 1100mm below existing ground level.
The Target Stratum for the foundation of the structure located at BH2 is the SANDY
CLAY at a depth of 1300mm below existing ground level.

Page | 1 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-1

Page 10

It is the designing engineer’s responsibility to address the potential influence of any trees
present on or around the proposed building site.

If any fill is placed over the existing ground, the structure shall be piered through the fill
into the existing material. Further note that the placement of reactive material as fill or
cutting of the site may change the site’s classification.

PLEASE NOTE: This report does not address slope stability. If a slope stability analysis
is required, the services of a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer should be sought.

4. SOIL PROFILE
Refer to Soil Profile Report for borelog information
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the borelogs carried out at the subject allotment
are indicative of the soil profile over the site any discrepancy between the profile detailed in
the borelogs and that observed during construction shall be referred to Global Testing for
immediate attention.

5. MATERIALS LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

Soil Laboratory testing carried out on samples of the soil taken from the site gave the following

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

results:

BOREHOLE BH1
DEPTH RANGE OF SAMPLE 0.2-0.5m
LIQUID LIMIT (%) N/a
PLASTIC LIMIT (%) Nia
PLASTIC INDEX (%) N/a
LINEAR SHRINKAGE (%) Nia
INSTABILITY INDEX (%) N/a
SHRINK SWELL INDEX, Iss (%) 2.8
PREDICTED SURFACE MOVEMENT 35mm

 

 

 

 

Please note that the Plasticity Index (PI) determined by the Atterberg Test may be correlated to
an Instability Index (Ips)with reference to the results of extensive testing carried out by others,
notably, Dr P Mitchell, ‘Footings for Small Scale Domestic Structures,’ March 1990.

Yours Sincerely,

4,44

MICHAEL PINKNEY. (Laboratory Manager)

Page | 2 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-1

Page 11

LIMITATIONS

Recommendations given in this report are based on the information supplied by the client
regarding the proposed building construction in conjunction with the findings of the
investigation. Any change in construction type, building location or omission in the client
supplied information, may require additional testing and/or make the recommendations
invalid.

The recommendations herein identify a target soil stratum into which the footings are to be
founded. The target stratum has been located by the depth in mm of the target stratum's upper
horizon boundary below the existing ground surface level at the time of the site investigation.
Any cutting or filling works and any surface erosion or deposits subsequent to the site
investigation, will alter the measured location of the stratum relative to the surface. Where
required, the author should be notified in such cases to confirm the location of the target
stratum.

The description of the soil given in the Soil Profile section of this report is intended as a brief
overview of the soil's primary constituents. For a detailed classification of the soil, the reader
should refer to the Soil Profile Reports and/or Borehole Reports attached to this report.

Every reasonable effort has been made to locate the test sites so that the borehole profiles are
representative of the soil conditions within the area investigated. The client should be made
aware however, that exploration is limited by time available and economic restraints. In some
cases, soil conditions can change dramatically over short distances, therefore, even careful
exploration programs may not locate all the variations.

If soil conditions different from those shown in this report are encountered or are inferred
from other sources, then the author must be notified immediately.

This report may not be reproduced except in full. The information and drawings provided
with this report shall only be used and will only be applicable for the development shown on
the client supplied information provided for this site.

Any dimensions, contours, slope directions and magnitudes shown on the Test Locality Plan
shall not be used for any building construction or costing calculations. The purpose of the
plan is to show approximate location of field tests only.

Any changes made to these recommendations by persons unauthorised by the author will
legally be interpreted as that person assuming the responsibility for the long-term
performance of the footing system.

The recommendations contained in this report have not taken into consideration the long-term
effects of any previous, current or potential subsurface work by mining companies or
potential slope instability problems. At the time of writing this report neither our client (nor
his agent) nor the local authority had made the author aware that these problems may be
affecting this allotment. If a mining subsidence or slope stability assessment is required for
this allotment, the recommendations of a suitably qualified geotechnical engineer should be
sought.

Page | 3 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-1

Page 12

GLOBAL TESTING

THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS

SOIL PROFILE REPORT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CLIENT: Lyndal Petersen AUTHORISED __Lyndal Petersen
BY:
PROJECT: Proposed Lot 12 (No.130) DATE TESTED: 24/05/2021
Lake Macdonald Drive,
Cooroy.
JOB NO: 21/0611-2
Drilling Method: Jacro 105 100mm. Borehole
No.1
Depth Description PENET. Est. Bearing
(mm) (blows per 100mm) Capacity
(kPa)
1 2) 3) 4
0 SANDY CLAY (CH)- High plasticity,
brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, firm.
100 2 50
200 SANDY CLAY (CH)- High plasticity, 3 100
brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, stiff.
300 4
400 4
500 5 150
600 4
700 6 <200
800 6
900 7
1000 8
1100 12
1200 SILTY SANDY CLAY (CI)- Medium 14
plasticity, brown, fine to coarse sand, moist,
very stiff. (Becoming Extremely Weathered
Rock)
1300 <20
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3000 Hole Terminated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page | 4 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-1

Page 13

GLOBAL TESTING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS
SOIL PROFILE REPORT
CLIENT: Lyndal Petersen AUTHORISED __Lyndal Petersen
BY:
PROJECT: Proposed Lot 12 (No.130) DATE TESTED: 24/05/2021
Lake Macdonald Drive,
Cooroy.
JOB NO: 21/0611-2
Drilling Method: Jacro 105 100mm. Borehole
No.2
Depth Description PENET. Est. Bearing
(mm) (blows per 100mm) Capacity
(kPa)
1] 2 73/4
0 SANDY CLAY (CH)- High plasticity,
brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, firm.
100 SANDY CLAY (CH)- High plasticity, 2 50
brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, stiff.
200 3 100
300 3
400 4
500 4 125
600 4
700 6 <200
800 6
900 6
1000 7
1100 8
1200 8
1300 12
1400 18
1500 <20
1600
1700
1800 SILTY SANDY CLAY (CI)- Medium
plasticity, brown, fine to coarse sand, moist,
very stiff. (Becoming Extremely Weathered
Rock)
1900
2000
3200 Hole Terminated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page | 5 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code

21/0611-1

 

Page 14

GLOBAL TESTING

 

THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS

 

Site- Proposed Lot 12 (No.130) Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy

Page | 6 Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-2017 Geotechnical Site Investigations Code
21/0611-1

Page 15

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ ONN See ui SUOISUAUUIP [fy Ajuo 5}Se]
3SOL oneisod - ict $ PIay Sy] Jo UONeoo] eyeulxoidde 6] MOUS 0] St UBId Buy Jo BSOduNd ay | SUOHEINDje9 Hurjs0d Jo UOH}ON.YSUOS BuIp|ING
UOHEIO] 1938 WIO.NSUSd SUOD D1WIBUAG - Nd * 5
USHeOeD SfoueIog - NE ep Aue 10) pasn oq jou jJeys ue}d 6yj UO UMOYS SepnyiUGeW pue suOoNoeuIp edo}s ‘SsuNOJOO ‘sUOISUeUIP Auy “8JON
anNao37

 

 

 

pu ‘yanur ay} Jo ao¥J.ns ay) UO padeyd

petap.10g ‘syuvyd o¢ Jo UMNUTTUTUT & YIM

 

-IANSSIA ,WIJLIIN 10 MOTJO}Se,
— vaIV UOHVSLLI dLaip aovjang paseo pu

00ST ATVOS wassajeg [epudy : yuat[D 01005 ‘aarig ppeuopoey] 24] (OETON) ZL 10'T pasodozgd : HS LZ0Z/S0/PTZ :P2382,L VC 1-1190/1Z ON Gor

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.