Original source · versioned page text
2022-05-10 P&E Committee Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - DRAFT - Noosa Threatened Fauna species Recovery Road Map
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
4. Evaluation
4.1 Decision Matrix
A comprehensive Decision Matrix is presented as Appendix One, which scores and ranks the shortlisted thirty-
four fauna species in relation to their conservation status and susceptibility to regional threating processes (the
selection criteria). A total of nine species of conservation significance (the Noosa Nine) will be nominated for
management priority through the Decision Matrix (Appendix One / Figure 2 below).
Figure 2: Decision Matrix (Refer to Attachment One for full matrix)
4.2 Selection criteria
Thirteen (13) criteria were used to score and rank species for management priorities. Weighting was applied to
criteria critical to delivering Strategy 1.3 of the NES. Table 4 (below) lists the selection criteria and weighting used
to nominate the Noosa Nine.
Table 4: Selection criteria and weighting
Criteria Weighting
From Strategy 1.3
Conservation advice 20%
Species utilisation of regional threatened ecological communities 15%
Sensitivity to overall ecosystem change (indicator species) 10%
Iconic status 10%
Threating Processes
Climate change impacts 5%
Development, land clearing and habitat fragmentation 5%
Inappropriate fire regimes 5%
Land use practices and water management 5%
Invasive species 5%
Disease 5%
Negative human / wildlife conflicts 5%
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.