Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

170903 ADAMS + SPARKES Minor Change Application · 51993.615.03

Attached to the e-mail Change to a Development Approval - 51993.615.03.

of 34

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

MINOR CHANGE TO EXISTING APPROVAL                                                                            5
6/13 NOOSA PARADE, NOOSA HEADS


   ‘Any premises used or intended for use for three (3) or more dwelling units. The term does not
   include an accommodation building, ages persons home, cabin park, duplex dwelling, group
   housing development, host farm, hotel, institution, relocatable homes park or retirement
   community as herein defined.’

The proposed minor change application does not result in the development being a different land use
definition to that approved under TPC 2557.

A review of the Queensland Government Gazette No. 111 confirms that development satisfies a majority
of the relevant planning provisions, with the proposed development (inclusive of the additions):
    •    Does not vary the built form when viewed from Noosa Parade;
    •    Does not vary the northern (front) eastern (side) and southern (rear) boundary setbacks;
    •    Does not vary the permitted building height;
    •    Complies with the minimum car parking space requirements (1 space per unit); and,
    •    Complies with the deep planting requirements of at least 20%.

The only area of non-compliance relates to 36.(c), which specifies:
   ‘For any side boundary, the distance between the property boundary and the building facade at any
   point, is equal to half (1.2) the building height in metres calculated at the same point, provided that
   at any gable roof the calculation shall be measure to half the height of the gable.’

The development does not comply with the above element, given that the proposed addition contains a
maximum building height of 3.55 metres, which would require a compliant setback of 1.77 metres. It is
noted that the proposed addition could be designed to comply with the minimum side boundary setbacks,
with a 2.4 metre high built form capable on the site, however, it is our opinion that this would result in a
far inferior design outcome, which would not integrate with the roof form of the existing development.
In addition to this, the development does not result in windows above 2.4 metres high (compliant setback
line).




Figure 5 Additional Building Height (Source: DCM Design + Drafting)


As identified in Section 2 above, Council may assess against, or have regard to, the matters that apply
when the change application was made. The planning scheme that is currently in effect is the Noosa Plan
2006.

The consideration of the Noosa Plan 2006 is appropriate, given that the Noosa Plan is a performance
based planning scheme, which contains similar setback objectives (Probable Solution) to that identified
within the Queensland Government Gazette No. 111 as outlined below.
TIM BARRETT AND JANE EAKIN
MARCH 2018

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.6 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

170903 ADAMS + SPARKES Minor Change Application.pdf · 3.6 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.