08/0169 - MCU - Dwelling House To Be Assessed Against the Superseded Planning Scheme [As Published] · 132008.169

‘

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007
iSTATE-CONTROLLED ROAD ]
241.1 Isany part of the premises within 100m of a State-controlled road, or part of a future State-controlled road?

() Yes
No

If no, is the proposed use listed in schedule 5 of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the specified
threshold?

LL) Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.

No

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, tems t{a) and 3
{ACID SULFATE SOILS ~ ]

2.1.2 Is the use proposed in a local government area listed? in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development
Involving Acid Sulfate Soils?

LI No
Yes

2 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboolture, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
; Rivers, Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

 

If yes, is the natural ground level of any part of the premises less than 20m AHD?
[1 No
Yes

If yes, will the proposed use involve the following?

« Excavating more than 1,000m? of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD [x] No Yes

Filling the premises with 1,000m? or more of material with an average depth of —{] No O Yes
0.5m on tand, soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD

if yes to either or both - this application must be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as
Advice Agency.

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, tem 4
State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils, section 3.6

 

 

[COASTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ‘|
2.1.3 Does the proposed use involve the following?
@ © Carrying out operational work, completely or partly in a coastal management district 1 No ] Yes

¢ Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the = [] No fl Yes
construction of new premises with a gross floor area (GFA) of at least 1,000m?

e Carrying out building work, completely or partly in a coastal management district, thatis the § [] No OYes
enlargement of the GFA of existing premises by more than 1,000m?

if yes to any one - this application must be referred to EPA as Concurrence Agency.
IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 6

 

 

\VEGETATION CLEARING |
2.1.4 Do the premises include a lot containing the following?

© Acategory 1, 2 or 3 area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) [x] No Yes

e  [f there is no PMAV for a lot, remnant vegetation x] No DO Yes

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 11

 

[CONTAMINATED LAND - UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE |

2.4.5 Is any part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for unexploded ordnance?

L]_ Yes - (Complete Part N) This application must be referred to the Administering Authority as Concurrence Agency.
No

IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 12