Council archive · source document
132008.169.1 Notice of Submission Bennett & Francis for Jude Productions
10/02 2011 THU 15:13 FAX +61 7 3239 5499 Bennett and Francis joo4/004 [3 proposed dwelling and associated built form does not accord with the stated objective of a “casual beachside locality”. Furthermore, we note that the large area in the north east corner of the “Non Urban” part of the block shown as “ vast area of undeveloped land to encourage native flora and fauna’ could just as easily be provided along in the north west corner of the site, and the whole development moved in a north easterly direction. The impacts as a buffer to the National Park would be presumably the same. Construction Access and Impacts: As has been noted in the application, the site access is from the cul de sac head of Seaview Terrace, and via a narrow driveway adjoining several properties. The method, type and style of construction predicates there will be a continued and ongoing requirement for earthwork machinery, construction machinery, and all associated construction personnel to access the site regularly. Associated with the construction personnel will be the requirement for parking. Whilst we acknowledge that the Tod Report attached to the Information Request has provided details to assist in the management of these matters, it will require constant compliance by the SCRC to achieve what has been detailed. In practice, what will eventuate will be a constant source of conflict between the construction personnel and the existing occupants. In addition there will be considerable impacts in relation to hours of operation, dust, dirt and noise. Any proposed development will need to be conditioned to reflect the requirement to mitigate the impacts of these to acceptable levels in relation to the existing owners and their properties. Conclusion: As stated previously, it is recognised that some form of development should and will occur on the subject site. The proposed development is clearly at odds with the published aims, objectives and intents of the Planning Scheme under which it has been asked to be assessed. The proposed development represents an unacceptable conflict with the stated engineering and environmental constraints listed, which are considered unacceptable in its current form. Yours faithfully, BENNETT) & FRANCIS PTY. LTD. On bekeall 3 ot jude Productions
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
132008.169.1 Notice of Submission Bennett & Francis for Jude ProductionsRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 203 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.