Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

132008.169.1 Notice of Submission Bennett & Francis for Jude Productions

of 4

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

10/02 2011 THU 15:13 FAX +61 7 3239 5499 Bennett and Francis joo4/004

[3

proposed dwelling and associated built form does not accord with the stated objective of a
“casual beachside locality”.

Furthermore, we note that the large area in the north east corner of the “Non Urban” part
of the block shown as “ vast area of undeveloped land to encourage native flora and
fauna’ could just as easily be provided along in the north west corner of the site, and the
whole development moved in a north easterly direction. The impacts as a buffer to the
National Park would be presumably the same.

Construction Access and Impacts:

As has been noted in the application, the site access is from the cul de sac head of
Seaview Terrace, and via a narrow driveway adjoining several properties. The method,
type and style of construction predicates there will be a continued and ongoing
requirement for earthwork machinery, construction machinery, and all associated
construction personnel to access the site regularly. Associated with the construction
personnel will be the requirement for parking.

Whilst we acknowledge that the Tod Report attached to the Information Request has
provided details to assist in the management of these matters, it will require constant
compliance by the SCRC to achieve what has been detailed. In practice, what will
eventuate will be a constant source of conflict between the construction personnel and the
existing occupants.

In addition there will be considerable impacts in relation to hours of operation, dust, dirt
and noise. Any proposed development will need to be conditioned to reflect the
requirement to mitigate the impacts of these to acceptable levels in relation to the existing
owners and their properties.

Conclusion:

As stated previously, it is recognised that some form of development should and will occur
on the subject site.

The proposed development is clearly at odds with the published aims, objectives and
intents of the Planning Scheme under which it has been asked to be assessed. The
proposed development represents an unacceptable conflict with the stated engineering
and environmental constraints listed, which are considered unacceptable in its current
form.

Yours faithfully,
BENNETT) & FRANCIS PTY. LTD.

 

On bekeall 3 ot jude Productions

Used in these records

About this file

File size
203 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

132008.169.1 Notice of Submission Bennett & Francis for Jude Productions.pdf · 203 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.