Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

DEPH Concurrence agency response - OPW12/0287

of 6

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

..




                                                                EHP Permit number:                  SPCC0486912



     in this development approval as to the scale, intensity or manner of carrying out
                                                                                         of the Activity, then such

     conditions prevail to the extent of the inconsistency.

                                                                                             harm unless a
     This development approval authorises the Activity. It does not authorise environmental
                        condition within this development approval explicitly  authorises that harm. Where there is
     concurrence agency
                                                                                                          shall not be
     no condition, or thedevelopment approval is silent on a matter, the lack of a condition or silence
     construed as authorising harmAs part of the concurrence agency response the following development
     conditions are to be attached to the development approval:




        ~
     Delegate
     Ben Sale
     Delegate, Chief Executive administering the Coastal Protection
     and Management Act 1995.
     Department of Environment and Heritage Protection
     14 November 2012




      Page 2 of 3’120607 Version 1
                        .                                                  Department of Environment and Heritage Protection


[OCR of page images]
EHP Permit number: SPCC0486912

 

in this development approval as to the scale, intensity or manner of carrying out of the Activity, then such
conditions prevail to the extent of the inconsistency.

This development approval authorises the Activity. It does not authorise environmental harm unless a
concurrence agency condition within this development approval explicitly authorises that harm. Where there is
no condition, or the development approval is silent on a matter, the lack of a condition or silence shall not be
construed as authorising harmAs part of the concurrence agency response the following development
conditions are to be attached to the development approval:

Delegate

Ben Sale

Delegate, Chief Executive administering the Coastal Protection
and Management Act 1995.

Department of Environment and Heritage Protection

14 November 2012

Page 2 of 3 » 120607 « Version 1 Department of Environment and Heritage Protection

Used in these records

About this file

File size
3.2 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

DEPH Concurrence agency response - OPW12_0287.pdf · 3.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.