Original source · versioned page text
2020-05-13 Special Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 13 MAY 2020
2 152006.1999.4 - APPLICATION FOR A MINOR CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL TO RECONFIGURE A LOT (52 LOTS & PARK) AT 191 HOLLETT RD,
NOOSAVILLE
Council Resolution
Moved: Cr Jurisevic
Seconded: Cr Wilkie
That Council note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the Special
Meeting dated 13 May 2020 and the Further Report to the Special Meeting dated 13
May 2020 regarding Application No. 152006.1999.4 to make a minor change to an
existing approval to Reconfigure a Lot (52 lots and park) situated at 191 Hollett Rd,
Noosaville and:
A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposed development conflicts with the South East Queensland
Regional Plan as the site is located in the Regional Landscape and Rural
Production area, in an area where the intent is to protect the landscape,
environmental values and capacity for rural production and where rural
settlement lots are not expected.
2. The proposed development conflicts with the requirements of Planning
Regulation 2017 as it is located in the Regional Landscape and Rural
Production Area and will result in the removal of koala habitat. The
proposed development would be prohibited development under the current
regulations.
3. The proposed development is inconsistent with the Noosa Plan’s Strategic
Framework as the proposed development will not conserve land for
agricultural purposes and will result in development inconsistent with the
rural character and amenity of the locality.
4. The proposed development is not consistent with the outcomes sought for
the site by the Tewantin and Doonan Locality Code, being located outside
the urban growth boundary, and on rural land intended to be protected and
managed to preserve the scenic and environmental values of the locality.
5. The proposed development fails to meet the Overall and Specific
Outcomes of the Biodiversity Overlay Code as the proposal will result in
the removal of significant vegetation, intrude into riparian buffers, and
remove koala habitat.
6. The proposed development does not satisfactorily address the risks to
people and property from bushfire and the proposed bushfire mitigation
measures will adversely impact on the site’s environmental values.
7. There is no need for the proposed development.
8. Changes are sought to conditions and the approval including conditions
concerning the timing of the development which are the subject of dispute
in other appeals.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act
2016.
Carried unanimously.
Page 3 of 5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.