Original source · versioned page text
2020-05-13 Special Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 13 MAY 2020
6. The proposed new dwelling house is fully located within a palustrine
wetland and is a groundwater dependent ecosystem and therefore is
inconsistent with the overall outcomes sought by the Detached House
Code (14.51.2 a) and h) as the land is not suitable for a detached house
and the proposal will adversely impact on the site and surrounding area’s
environmental values, including environmentally sensitive areas.
7. The proposed detached dwelling and second lot would increase the
potential development footprint and allowable site density, exacerbating
known impacts, and resulting in additional impacts on the amenity of the
locality contrary to Specific Outcome O26 of the Detached House Code.
8. The proposal is contrary to the draft Noosa Plan as it proposes to establish
a lot and house site within a groundwater dependant ecosystem which is
defined as an ecologically important area. Specifically:
a) The development fails to meet the outcomes of 9.4.8 Water Quality
and Drainage Code in that it does not protect ecology and
groundwater dependent ecosystems nor maintain fish passage.
b) The development proposes drainage lines and does not propose to
reinstate or revegetate disturbed areas and is therefore inconsistent
with specific outcomes in PO5.
c) The development is not designed to be located, designed,
constructed and operated to protect and enhance environmental
values and water quality of waterways, wetlands, lakes, ground
waters and drainage systems and therefore is inconsistent with
outcomes P06, 11, 12 and 13 relating to stormwater quality and
protection of receiving waters.
d) The development proposes new infrastructure excavation and fill in
a groundwater discharge zone and is therefore inconsistent with
outcomes AO13.1, 13.2.
e) As such the development fails to meet Overall Outcomes Coastal
Communities (7.2.6.2) as it is neither sited nor designed to protect
ecologically important areas and retain landscape elements.
B. Note the following are reasons for adopting this decision:
1. The Noosa Plan does not support the establishment of a separate allotment
within 50m of the National Park;
2. The proposed lot is flood affected;
3. The proposed development will cause offsite flooding impacts; and
4. The proposal does not comply with the outcomes of the Noosa Plan and
the draft New Noosa Plan.
For: Crs. Stockwell, Jurisevic, Wilkie, Lorentson, Finzel and Wegener
Against: Cr Stewart
Carried.
3 MEETING CLOSURE
The meeting closed at 1.21pm.
Page 5 of 5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.