Original source · versioned page text
2016-02-02 P&O Committee - Item 7 - Attachment 1 - Waste Management PBA Draft Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Impact Area Impact Criteria Impact Benefits / Cost Description Qualitative Assessment
Type
Likelihood Consequence Impact
Business Staff Resourcing Benefits Resourcing within the business under the FCP model will n.a. n.a. Nil Benefit
Costs be dependent on customer demand rather than from n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
NIL IMPACT additional compliance related responsibilities.
Morale Benefits Nil identified. n.a. n.a. Nil Benefit
Costs n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
NIL IMPACT
Customers Pricing Benefits The adoption of user pays pricing principles will ensure that Very High Moderate High Benefit
Costs all customers are treated in an equitable manner and there n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
NET are no cross subsidies between customers in product
BENEFIT supply.
(high)
Customer Service Benefits Little, if any, confusion or impact on customer service Moderate Moderate Medium Benefit
Provision Costs provision would be likely, given the current FCP structure in n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
place and ustomer perception of the business as a Council
NET function.
BENEFIT
(medium)
Regional Supporting Benefits Full cost pricing practices provides the funds necessary to Very High Low Medium Benefit
Development Regional Costs ensure appropriate ongoing investment in waste n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
and Economic Development infrastructure to continue to support ongoing regional
Stability demand for waste services, providing business and
NET industry with the resources required to continue ongoing
BENEFIT regional development.
(medium)
Sustainable Benefits Appropriate price signals would be sent to businesses High Low Medium Benefit
Investment looking to invest in the region.
Costs Under the FCP business model, administration and High Very Low Low Cost
NET compliance costs would be minimised and constrained
BENEFIT towards minimum statutory requirements.
(low)
Social Welfare Equity Between Benefits The adoption of full cost pricing principles on a per product Very High Low Medium Benefit
and Equity Customers Costs basis will ensure that individual products are appropriately n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
priced relative to the market (and allow transparent
NET decision making should cross subsidisation between
BENEFIT products and respective customer groups through specific
(medium) pricing arrangements be required).
Ratepayer Equity Benefits Transparent decision making regarding the provision of Moderate Low Low Benefit
Costs non-commercial and community-focused activities should n.a. n.a. Nil Cost
NET occur, with Council directives funded via CSO payments to
BENEFIT the business funded by the general rate (with Council
(low)
Waste Management Public Benefit Assessment Page 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.