Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

Information Response - Email 1 of 2 MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 124

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (22.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

           Table 2 - Hazard Score Vs Severity of Bushfire Hazard (Table A3.2 App 3 SPP1/03)
                Slope                                    Hazard Score

                   Gorges and mountains (>30%)                             5

                        Steep hills (>20% to 30%)                          4

                        Rolling hills (>10% to 20%)                        3

                        Undulating (>5% to 10%)                            2

                             Plain (0% to 5%)                              1



4.2.2.3   Aspect

Aspect affects bushfire hazard due to the effects that exposure to direct sunlight has on
different vegetation communities, including the drying rates of fuels. Aspect also correlates
closely with exposure to low humidity winds that increase bushfire intensity. The intensity
and rate of spread of bushfires tends to be greater on slopes with north to westerly
aspects, although this influence is not considered to be discernible on land with a slope
less than 5%.

Figure 4 illustrates the compass degree ranges and corresponding hazard scores for each
aspect category.


Figure 4 – Hazard Score for Aspect (Figure A3.1 App 3 SPP1/03)




4.2.2.4   Combined Scores

The cumulative total of all three loading factors is used to determine a specific site’s
severity of bushfire hazard. Table 3 describes the range of SPP1/03 bushfire hazard levels
and their respective total hazard scores.




                                            Bushfire Management Plan
February 2015                                                                       Page 12
                                       215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach
                                             Scanlon Property Group
Log in to download the original file

Information Response - Email 1 of 2 MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 22.0 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.