Council archive · source document
07/2398 - Request for information response [As Published] · 132007.2398
2.3 2020 Scenario As detailed in the submitted traffic report, the Diamond Street / Elm Street intersection would exceed its operational capacity by the base year of 2020 (.e. without the subject development) and for this reason it is expected that this intersection would need to be signalised by others prior to 2020. As summarised in Table 9 of the traffic report (Ref 1), the Elm St / Diamond St intersection as a signalised intersection would operate satisfactorily with the additional traffic generated by the proposed development. Based on the above, the additional detailed analysis indicates that the proposed development does not adversely impact the operation of the network and therefore the Applicant should not be responsible for contributing to the upgrade of the intersection. Yours sincerely, Gerard Reardon Associate Director McCormick Rankin Cagney Enc. 9427-002(1) - RFI.doc
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/2398 - Request for information response [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.