Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object- Linda Suter

of 27

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

             neighbourhood'      consisting of Community          Services, Housing and Open-space Recreations Zones,
             and is NOT appropriate       given the existing and likely future traffic movements                   in the area.'


     4.      There are no matters of public interest to bear in relation to the proposed Development                              that
             are grounds to accept the non-complying              Application   under s326 of the Sustainable Planning
             Act (2009) (SPA), and indeed the Development              is detrimental         to the public interest.


     5.      The Application     DOES NOT COMPLY, or fails to provide creditable supporting                      evidence to
             substantiate    claims of compliance, with over thirty (30) aspects of relevant planning instruments.


1. INCONSISTENT USE:

A shop is identified        as an inconsistent     use within the Industry Zone, being a Retail Business Type 2, and
the Application         must be rejected      on those grounds.         Under the Sustainable                Planning Act 2009 The
assessment manager's decision must not conflict with a relevant instrument,                            unless there are there are
sufficient    favourable     public interest grounds to justify the decision, despite the conflict.


Section 326(1)(b) of the SPA sets out sufficient             grounds for departing              from a relevant instrument.              The
SPA provides that an assessment manager may decide a development                               application    in a way that conflicts
with a relevant instrument            only in certain circumstances,       the relevant of which here is where there are
sufficient    grounds to justify the decision, despite the conflict. This means that an assessment manager
may approve            an application,     even though      the    proposed      development           conflicts     with    a relevant
instrument,      only if there are sufficient grounds for approving the development                     despite the conflict.


Conflict     means to be "at variance            or disagree with"      and must be plainly            identified.     In the current
circumstances        the proposed        Development     is in direct     conflict     with     the planning       scheme, being an
inconsistent      use for the Industry zone. The planning scheme does not provide for a co-located                                 service
station/retail     convenience     shop in the Industry zone.


The term 'grounds',          in the context, is defined in the SPA to mean matters of public interest. Apart from
defining the term grounds, the SPA does not provide any guidance about what grounds are sufficient for
justifying    a decision that may conflict with a relevant             instrument.      The matters          'public interest',    derive
from the subject matter           being considered      which includes the community                need, wellbeing,         protection,
health and safety of the community               or affected classes of persons. In determining                whether      a conflicting
Development         should     be Approved       he Assessment       Manager         may also consider          negative      impact     on
matters of public interest.


The Development           does not meet 0 substontioted       community         need

A development          may be said to be needed if, on balance, it improves community                          wellbeing. Wellbeing
may be improved           by access to new services or facilities or a range of other ways. However, any new
uses must be compatible           with surrounding      uses in terms of amenity, the environment                     and economics.
As is demonstrated          through    this document     the proposed Development                 does not improve          community



3 Noosa Plan, Part 14 -      Assessment Criteria for Development for a Stated Purpose or of a Stated Type - For Service
   Stations - Siting
4 ibid




                                                                                                                                            2
Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object- Linda Suter.pdf · 10.1 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.