L05 Response to NC FURTHER advice · MCU20/0026

 Page 3

       As demonstrated by the photomontages the visual amenity of nearby premises is maintained.
       Significant view lines are maintained and the development of the site for a dwelling is a desirable option
       for the steep site and narrow roadway.

       b) provide adequate distance from adjoining uses;

       The reduced front setbacks provide greater setbacks to Park Crescent than the existing dwelling on
       site and other dwellings along the eastern side of the road. The setback enables informal parking on
       site and complements the adjoining carparking areas.

       c) preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer the proposed building;

       Due to the constraints of the site there is limited opportunity to retain the existing vegetation at the front
       of the premises and provide appropriate access.

       d) allow for landscaping to be provided between buildings and street frontages and between
          neighbouring buildings;

       Landscaping able to be provided between adjoining buildings and to the street frontage.

       e) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of buildings and landscape elements within the street; and

       As detailed the eastern side of Park Crescent contains dwellings that are located within the front
       setback. The proposed setbacks and building are consistent with the form of buildings that have been
       approved in the area. It is noted that approved duplex to the south of the site has been approved with
       the garages located at the front boundary and the third storey at 6 metres. The proposed setbacks
       therefore maintain the visual continuity of the street.




Proposed dwelling section