MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Maureen Thomas

                                                                                                                                         ..


  4.     ConIlnn Ihat the fOllo••,ng man<lalory supporting       Infonn •.tlon ateo"",.nle.lhls          applicalion

  Man<lalory supporting       Infonnation                                                  COnnnnatlon     of     Melho<! of
                                                                                           Io<!gemenl             Io<!gemenl
  AUappilcatlons
  A site plan d.awn 10 an apprtlpfia\e scale (1:100. 1:200 0' 1:500 ere                    ~nnnned
  recommended scales) which shows Ihe f_no:
  • Ihe location and s~e area <Jf Ibe Iftnd to Which the application relales
       f,reIevBl1t W!d)
  • the nonh point
  • the bounderies of tile relevant land
  • any roacl lronl"lles of the l1lIevalll I'nd, Including Ibe name of the road
    til. location and use of any existing or proposed wldingS or _ures
  • on  ll1e relevant land (note: wIle,e extenslve demolition or new buildings
       .re proposecl. two separate plans (an existing site plan 8na proposed site
       plan) may be approJXiale)
  •    any e>!stlng (>l"proposea casements on lIle Illiavanliana and III";,
       function
  •    lhe 100000ion and use of builOings on I.na adjoining the Illievallll.nd
  •    all vehicle access points and 8ny exisling o. propo.ea car pall<Jng •••••
       on Ihe relevolll land. Co, pall<Jng.paces  '0' pet"""" with dlsabllitie. oncl
       any service vehicle a=       .00 parking shoulcl be clearly marl<ed
  •    fa< 8rrf new building on Ina "'Ievanll.na. the kleatlllfl fArefuse 510."110
  •    lhe 1000tion of "I'Y proposed relairing walls no the relevant laOO.nd their
       height
  •    thelOClltion of any proposed IaOOscaping on the rel~vant land       .
  •    thie tocaUoo of .any stormwa1er detention on the relevant land.



The Mandatory             supporting        information      is lacking in its requirements                 in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.

The applicant             confirmed     that     information       provided        demonstrated                 the onsite     parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered)                               merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.

 When tile application      involves new operational      work

 Plans ShOwklg tne nature. locallon. number of new on. site car parldng bays,          .12fCOnfinned
 pr""" •• clarea of new Iaooscaping. proposea type CI new ""hlele cross-over
 (non-resident ••1US<ls),proposed maximum new vehl",,"', 50lViCing       .
                                                                                        o Not applicable
 arrangemont (1IOlHesl<lenllal useo) ofltle proposea rle'Hoperational wo~.


The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted                                      to meet this mandatory
requirement         but those provided do not achieve this requirement.

Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.

Size and Scale of development

The submitted             plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 35m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint                            proposed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
7.5m x 5o4m (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.

                                                                                       •