Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix E - Code Compliance Reports

From the archive REC14/0005 Reconfiguration of a lot - 178 Eumundi Noosa Road, Noosaville. File date in the archive: 2014-04-04 12:20.

of 45

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                                                                                                                                                  RECONFIGURING OF A LOT CODE
                                                                                                                                        Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions




                                                         PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                                                                             COUNCIL USE
       PERFORMANCE CRITERIA                                                                    SOLUTIONS*                         COMMENTS
                                                         (IF CODE ASSESSABLE)                                                                                              ONLY
Availability and Protection of Resources                                                          N/A       Not applicable – refer to S25.2.
O28                                              S28.1
Development does not limit the potential         No additional lots are created within Areas
for the utilisation of extractive resources by   of Potential Extractive or Mining Resource
creating conflicts of interest.                  Influence shown on Overlay Maps
                                                 OM1.5—OM9.5.


ROAD AND RAIL CORRIDORS
O29                                              S29.1                                            N/A       Not applicable – the proposal is not for a residential
Lots for residential development are not         Lots intended for residential development                  development.
subjected to high traffic noise levels from      are separated by a minimum of—
the major road network or rail corridors.        a) 40m from the property boundary of
                                                 roads within the major road network; and
                                                 b) 80m from the property boundary of rail
                                                 corridors; or

                                                 S29.2                                            N/A       Not applicable – the proposal is not for a residential
                                                 Development in the vicinity of road                        development.
                                                 corridors meets the following external
                                                 design criteria for roads in the major road
                                                 network— 63dB(A)L10 (18hours) based
                                                 on predicted traffic volumes ten years
                                                 hence; or

                                                 S29.3                                            N/A       Not applicable – the proposal is not for a residential
                                                 Development in the vicinity of rail                        development.
                                                 corridors meets the following external
                                                 design level noise criteria—
                                                 a)       65dB(a), assessed as the 24hour
                                                 average equivalent continuous Aweighted
                                                 sound pressure level; and
                                                 b)       87dB(A), assessed as a single
                                                 event maximum sound pressure level.


1    Solution:  = Acceptable Solution                                                                                                                                       Appendix E
               A/S = Alternative Solution                                                                                                                        Code Compliance Reports
               N/A = Not applicable to this proposal

Gateway Drive, Noosaville                                                                                                                                                       Page 18
Log in to download the original file

Appendix E - Code Compliance Reports.pdf · 352 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.