Original source · versioned page text
Appendix E - Code Compliance Reports
From the archive REC14/0005 Reconfiguration of a lot - 178 Eumundi Noosa Road, Noosaville. File date in the archive: 2014-04-04 12:20.
RECONFIGURING OF A LOT CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
Lot Size and Dimensions
O1 S1.1 (a) Complies – proposed Lot 101 is (2.259ha &
Lots have the appropriate area33 and If for reconfiguration other than 1,267m2 in parts) and proposed Lot 103 is
2
dimensions to provide for— community title subdivision, Council will 4,073m . Both lots achieve the minimum width
(a) the intended use and, if not intended require the following— requirements.
to be used by the Council or State for (a) Minimum lot area and minimum (b) Not applicable – the proposal is not for residential
community infrastructure, average width consistent with the development.
conservation purposes or public relevant provisions of Table 14-68;
utilities including road widening are and
not less than the minimum sizes (b) If for residential development—
specified in Table 14-62—Minimum (i) the minimum house site area is
Allotment Areas; and not less than that specified in
(b) if for residential development— Table 14-69; and
(i) a house site area of not less than (ii) if not in a sewerage service area
that specified in Table 14-63; and an effluent disposal area is
(ii) if not within a sewerage service provided.
area, an effluent disposal area;
(c) for community title subdivision, the
minimum lot sizes for the intended
uses are not less than identified for
the relevant zone specified in Table
14-68.
(d) siting and construction of buildings to
minimise risk of soil erosion, landslide,
flooding and bushfire;
(e) siting and construction of buildings to
minimise detrimental impacts of
effluent disposal and water quality
impacts;
(f) retention of natural environmental
values, including native vegetation;
(g) retention of cultural features and
protect views to cultural features;
(h) minimisation of earthworks or
1 Solution: = Acceptable Solution Appendix E
A/S = Alternative Solution Code Compliance Reports
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
Gateway Drive, Noosaville Page 1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original