Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Council archive · source document

Response to further advice notice · MCU21/0171.01

of 5

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

We trust that the significant reduction in size, inclusion of landscape screening, increased side setback
and additional documentation provided herein is sufficient to address Council’s comments and
demonstrate compliance with PO16 of the Low density residential zone code.

Northern side setback
For the proposed building height and scale of building; the northern side setback of 1.0 metre
is not supported and does not comply with AO9.3 and PO9 of the Low Density Residential zone code.
Advice Required
6. Amend the plans to show a minimum landscaped side setback of 1.5 metres.

Response – The northern side setback has been increased from 1m to 1.5m and the plans have been
amended to show landscaping in the side setback zone.

Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity
The plans and elevation do not show the intended landscaping to the rear of the dwelling as
required under AO5 of the Coastal Protection and scenic amenity overlay code.
The plans and elevation show the intended architectural ‘Finishes Schedule’ however is
considered a limited palette when compared to the intended range listed under AO5 of the
Coastal Protection and scenic amenity overlay code (below).
Appropriate wall colours will depend on the existing native vegetation and backdrop, but may include
muted earth/environmental tones that blend with the natural environment, such as–
• green, • olive green; • blue green; • grey green; • green blue; • indigo; • brown; • blue grey; and • green yellow.

Amend the plans to show landscaped areas to the rear of the site and incorporate a more varied architectural
colour palette as listed under AO5.

Response – The site plan has been amended to show a 5m landscaped area at the rear of the site. In
relation to the proposed colour scheme, the project architect has provided the following justification: V&P
have put together the following written response in relation to the current colour selection:

1. There is a long history of using tar or ash (black), red-oxide (earth) and lime (white) coloured timber
   buildings in the landscape, as these colours relate to the earliest forms for timber preservative used
   by both western and eastern cultures. These naturally occurring elements/pigments have always
   been used to preserve timber buildings in the natural vegetated landscape.’
2. Red is not the sole colour in the buildings elevation and is employed as a secondary colour acting as
   a shadow in the composition. The primary material of the building elevations is natural timber board
   and glass (as requested in A05 of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay).
3. Red paint is also present within local existing buildings within Plover Street include a well renowned
   house by Architect Geoffrey Pie.

We trust this additional information and justification is sufficient to allow Council to determine
compliance is achieved with PO5 of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Code in terms of the
colour scheme being finished predominantly in colours and hues of the surrounding natural landscape.



4

Used in these records

About this file

File size
183 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Response to further advice notice.pdf · 183 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.