Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

MCU12/0023 Notice of Submission Brian Kettlewell

of 1

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                            SCRC CORRESPONDENCE



                                           11111111111      1111111         @
                                                  80481443




    To The Assessment Manager


    Sunshine Coast regional Council


    locked Bag 72 Sunshine Coast MC Qld. 4560

    0754757272


    Re Proposed Development


    Material Change of use ...Application No. MCU12/0023


    I refer to the application filed in the Planning and Environment Court in Oecember 2011
                                                                                                                    by
    Scanlon Property Group Pty ltd (SPG). In this application SPG seeks to vary the conditions of

    approval granted by the Court in 2009.

    SPG wants the condition prohibiting outdoor dining deleted from the agreement reached

    between the Council and SPG which formed part of the order of the Court. The Council had
    insisted on this condition because of the noise likely to be created by outdoor dining and SPG

    agreed to this condition.

    In addition SPG now seeks approval for the construction of balconies to approx. 14 motel style

    units. SPG did not seek earlier approval for the balconies, because the balconies were not even

    on the   plans submitted to Council at first instance.

    I urge the Council to refuse approval for these variations sought by SPG


    For these reasons:


             Residents in the surrounding area will be subjected to unacceptable levels of noise from
             the 70 sq metres of outdoor dining (as previously argued by Council)
             There will be further unaccep,table noise from the 14 balconies where residents will

             gather and no doubt socialise.
             There will be a likely detriment and/or loss of custom to existing eating establishments
             in the immediate area.


    Name (print in   full)_.S tZ.cPt-t-l \ee-..-(’’’’’\L2a:>~.
                ~       n
                     Co K...(V\
                                    0
                                0(c....   N,--r    C-t-ESc_erJ-r                     P~t~(ri-,_j ~(_+iA
    Address     [.

                                                                                                         4S7$
                                                         II-{..-. 5"". (2_,

                                                                                   If9~
                                                                            !)I   {{~ f           ...&g........]~
                                                                 GB        ,~....IO,......
                                                                      o.{’ .
                                                                        ,
                                                                                             R:



                                                                         (IlCIJIJ!oo~3
(

Used in these records

About this file

File size
512 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU12_0023 Notice of Submission Brian Kettlewell.pdf · 512 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.