Council archive · source document
Reference Document - Acoustic Assessment 132007.2446.05
Flashpackers Noosa Environmental Noise Level Impact Assessment for Proposed Addition of Second Floor to Block C and Associated Increase to Bed Numbers for Flashpackers, 102 and 106 Pacific Avenue, Sunshine Beach Page 16 of 29 Roofed Communal Area The roofed communal area is adjacent to Pacific Avenue and would have a capacity for up to approximately 15 to 20 guests and has a perimeter acoustic barrier 1.8 metres high. At the closest adjoining residence, which is to the north-west, the noise level of 20 guests laughing and talking (64 + 15 x log1020 = 83.5 = 84 dB(A) LWAeq,adj,T) would be: • 84 dB(A) LWAeq,adj,T – 35 (22m distance) – 8 (acoustic barrier) = 41 dB(A) LAeq,adj,T. For up to 20 guests in the roofed communal area adjacent to Pacific Avenue the 24-hour noise limits are complied with, and this compliance is achieved with no additional noise control measures required. Plant Noise Three new air conditioning units are proposed for the new second floor of Block C – Daikin model RXF35WVMA with a sound power level of 60 dB(A) for cooling and 61 dB(A) for heating, L WAeq,T. These air conditioning units are to be located as per Figure 6. The top of these units is 550mm above ground level. The closest adjoining residence to these ground level air conditioning units is to the north-west, and at this residence the noise of the three air conditioning units combined would be: • 61 dB(A) + 4.8 (all three air conditioning units operating) – 22 (5m distance noise reduction) – 10 (intervening 1.8m high acoustic barrier) + 3 (reflected noise) = 36.8 = 37 dB(A) LAeq,adj,T. The noise level of all three air conditioning units operating on the highest noise level (heating) at the same time complies with the steady state noise limits at the closest residence to the north-west for the complete 24-hour day, with no additional noise control measures required. NOISE CONTROL The noise level impact calculations detailed in this report assume that there are existing 1.8 metre high acoustic barriers located as per Figure 2. If any of these acoustic barriers are in a poor state of repair then to comply with the noise limits for the additional noise sources associated with the addition of the upper floor for Block C they must be made good. In addition, the acoustic barrier on the north- eastern boundary needs to be extended to the south-east to overlap with Block A by a minimum 2 metres. This small additional section of acoustic barrier must achieve compliance with the following: • be a minimum 1.8 metres high relative to current ground levels; • be located as per Figure 7; • continuous and gap free; • have a minimum surface area density of 10 kg/m2. Examples of suitable materials of construction include, but are not limited to: o reinforced concrete; o concrete block; o brick; o hebel panel; o sheet metal at least 2 mm thick; o minimum 7.5 mm thick fibrous cement sheet; o earth mound; o lapped timber palings, for example, kiln dried softwood palings at least 19 mm thick and overlapped a minimum 20 mm; o any combination of the above. With the 1.8 metre high acoustic barriers located as per Figure 7 in place, in conjunction with separation distance and intervening building/s acting as acoustic barriers, all potential noise sources associated with the proposed addition of a second floor to Block C, three air conditioning units (to David Moore & Associates Pty Ltd Our reference: R25048/D3966/Rev.draft/23.05.25
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - Acoustic Assessment 132007.2446.05.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.9 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.