Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

2017-04-11 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 1 Housing Needs Assessment

of 229

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

         There is a high proportion of detached houses, relative to other comparative tourism-
          oriented LGAs1;
         Some 24% of all occupied dwellings in Noosa Shire are usually occupied by one person
          living alone, and 58.4% by a person living alone or a couple;
         The highest proportion of two person households live in 3-bedroom dwellings, with the
          second highest proportion in 4-bedroom dwellings;
         A significant proportion of small households are living in large dwellings. It is however
          noted that particularly in an affluent community, a proportion of households may choose
          to live in larger dwellings than seemingly required, or this may occur by circumstance;
         Housing stress is high in Noosa Shire relative to Brisbane or Queensland, but similar to
          comparative LGAs:
            o   At 34.5%, the proportion of low income households that are renting and
                experiencing rental stress is higher than other comparative LGAs (except for Fraser
                Coast), and higher than Brisbane and Queensland;
            o   15.8% of low income households that are paying a mortgage were experiencing
                mortgage stress, similar to the other comparative LGAs, but significantly higher than
                Brisbane or Queensland;
            o   Low income households experiencing either rental stress or mortgage stress made
                up around 16% of all households in other comparative LGAs in 2011, but this was a
                significantly higher proportion than for Brisbane with 11.3% or Queensland with
                12%.
         Noosa Shire appears less affordable than all comparative LGAs, Brisbane City and
          Queensland:
            o   Accommodation affordability is impacted by both low median incomes and high
                median accommodation costs;
            o   Median rents for flats/ units in the Shire are fairly similar to the State but rents for
                houses are higher than the State;
            o   There has been a declining trend in rental vacancy rates over the last five years from
                around 4-5% to around 1-2%;
            o   The median dwelling sale price in Noosa Shire has remained higher than the State
                at all times between 1998 and 2015;
            o   In 2011 median household income was almost $200 below the SEQ Region and
                almost $300 below the State per week.
            o   Between 5-10 additional percentage points of income are needed in Noosa Shire to
                afford a dwelling compared to the next most unaffordable comparative LGA
                considered (which for most indicators was the Gold Coast).




1
    Fraser Coast, Douglas Shire and the Gold Coast




Briggs & Mortar Pty Ltd | Page 2
Log in to download the original file

2017-04-11 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 1 Housing Needs Assessment(PDF, 3MB).pdf · 3.6 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.